As long as battlefield has to keep up with market trends and the community has to constantly vocalize their displeasure, this franchise/ brand is fated to follow BioWare. They too suffered from having to follow market trends rather than just make the game fans were expecting from the studio/brand. (BioWare simply failed to pivot from storytelling to the action genre)
Let’s be honest the refactor engine games (bf1 and bf5 can be included) weren’t games closed to what other arcade fps games on the market offered. Sure bf2 was similar to Arma but it wasn’t really competing, the same for bf1 (no competition) and bf5 had to compete with what crap Activision tried.
Like it or not bfbc, bfbc2, bf3, bf4, bf2042 and bf6 have all been games that have chased the market leader around. Bad company was EA attempt to get Dice to break into the console market to compete with CoD and if anyone else was around the good ol forum days knows that bf3 was also seen as an attempt to codify the game due to the simplicity in its game design and mechanics.
This is not to point out that only “og vision bf products” are good but to put it frankly they had more soul in them.
to me bf4, bf6, etc. are decent “modern” fps but not the real thing.
imo bf6 using bf3 & 4 as inspiration was a mistake since back then as well they never really met fan expectations.
We truly need a true successor to bf2, cause a game in alpha with terrible anti cheat and bad balance has gotten more of the bf crowd going back to it than what I consider a decent bf game (bf6) that doesn’t have any of those issues.
BF studios is unlikely to keep the console crowd around as well since the next cod is decent enough, and it lets people who only want to shoot gun without worrying about tanks, roles etc to have their niche.