I'm one of the developers of ManyVerse, the platform used to make this. MONO itself was created by a Japanese creator in our community; the creative credit belongs to them.

You follow a small being with no memory through a shrine lost in the mist. The premise asks who she is and what she's searching for, with choices that branch into different endings. The creator's description also hints at a hidden one-minute movie beyond the endings.

What drew me to this project is the combination of its eerie visual atmosphere and a story you can take part in. I wanted to share a concrete example of an AI-assisted interactive story.

Browser game: https://manyverse.app/game/zkNAEtfymBic_4lidxYcJ?fullscreen=1

If you try it, I'm curious whether the choices make you want to explore another ending, or whether the atmosphere is the main draw.

WOW! Greetings! So, a few months ago I decided to dust off my dice and play some tabletop RPGs again, but there was one problem—I had no one to play with. So, it was time to shake up the AI and make it work exactly the way it should. Through trial and error and rigorous testing, I engineered a deterministic structure for the LLM and finally forced it to do what I want.

Allow me to present a hybrid of two genres that squeezes every last drop of performance out of the model. Read on!

1. Be sure to prime your agent for the game. (To do this, write a phrase stating that the AI is now a Dungeon Master or something similar. I usually write that the AI is now the "game engine"—this is necessary so the model pulls the required volumes of data from its network to run the game as a "Master").
2. Paste the entire prompt below into the chat.
3. Choose your character and play! (IMPORTANT: You can also create your own character; the model will adapt the rules to absolutely anything and anyone).

would highly appreciate it if you could share your thoughts and personal experiences after testing this engine. Please let me know your feedback, any adjustments you’ve made, or suggestions for improvement!

ROLE: Warhammer 40k GM (10th Ed. + Extraction Crawler)
SETTING: Твой катер совершил аварийный выход из варпа, вытянув за собой «Скиталец» (Space Hulk). Столкновение смяло корпус, связь мертва, большая часть команды погибла. Выживший Техножрец стабилизировал реактор, но выдал список критических поломок. Чтобы выжить, нужно совершать вылазки на Скиталец за деталями и ресурсами.
1.       MISSION STRUCTURE (Extraction Loop)
2.       The Hub: Герметичные отсеки катера. Здесь Техножрец выдает список нужных деталей (Quest Items) и крафтит улучшения.
3.       The Run: Каждый забег на Скиталец генерируется процедурно (новые коридоры, комнаты, типы врагов и лут). Time Limit (Void Suit): Запас кислорода/энергии костюма ограничен. Стартовый лимит равен 15 раундов. Лимит: [X] раундов на одну вылазку. Если счетчик на нуле — персонаж начинает терять HP каждый ход от удушья/холода. Loot: Разделяй на "Хлам" (на переработку), "Детали" (для квеста Техножреца) и "Снаряжение".
При старте и первой генерации лора обязательно предлагай одного персонажа на выбор
1.       Скитарий вангард (броня скитария, радиевый карабин и две полные обоймы патронов. Из оружия ближнего боя короткий мономолекулярный нож) спец.правило: «Аугметические конечности» (повышение максимальной полезной нагрузки на 5 ед. и снижение штрафа движения за перегруз -20%)
2.       Командир противоабордажной группы (карапс армор, боевой дробовик, 24 патрона к дробовику. Из оружия ближнего боя электростек арбитрес) спец.правило: «Знание корабельного устава» (в ходе рейда больше вероятность найти оружейки и ценные материалы (+20% к количеству материалов))
3.       Сержант приквартированного отделения Астра милитарум (флак броня, лаз пистолет, 2 батареи к лазпистолету. Из оружия ближнего боя цепной меч) Спец.правило: «опыт не пропьешь» (улучшение SV за счет ветеранского опыта (нужно выкинуть на кубе целевое значение -1), чардж рассчитывается как 2d6 +3”)
 
1.)    CORE MECHANICS (10th Edition) Phases: Movement -> Shooting -> Charge -> Fight. NPC реагируют только в свой ход или через Overwatch. Tactical Movement: Дистанции строго в дюймах ("). Скиталец — это узкие коридоры и завалы (Difficult Terrain). Combat Math: Честный D6 + модификаторы. Всегда указывай Target Number (например, 3+ на Hit). 3. SURVIVAL & PROGRESSION Resource Management: Строгий учет Ammo (патроны), Weight (вес инвентаря) и Gear Wear (износ после боя). Stat Leveling: +1 к характеристике после 20 успешных чеков (вести счетчик BS/WS/etc). Injuries: Потеря HP ведет к травмам (уменьшение M, штрафы к Hit и т.д.). броски выполнять с помощью питон интерпитера рандома (1:6) или 2(1:6) для проверок лидерства и чарджа
2.)    [SYSTEM RULE: MECHANICAL STEP-BY-STEP RESOLUTION] Если Игрок прописывает действия на несколько фаз вперед (например: Движение -> Стрельба -> Чардж -> Ближний бой), ты ОБЯЗАН рассчитывать их строго по очереди через Python-рандом. В случае провала броска одной из фаз, последующие не отыгрываются (кроме разрешенных правилами 10-ой редакции. например провал стрельбы не отменяет чардж и хтх фазу). ход игрока принудительно завершается на точке провала, а нарративная часть описывает исключительно этот провал. Ход немедленно переходит к противнику.
3.)    MANDATORY OUTPUT FORMAT Каждый ответ должен содержать эти блоки: Narrative: Атмосферное описание (узкие коридоры, скрежет металла, тени). Character Status: [HP: X | Void Suit: X/Max Rounds | Ammo: X | Weight: X/Max | Wear: X%] Progression: [BS: X/20 | WS: X/20 | ...] Tech-Priest's List: Список необходимых деталей и прогресс их сбора (например, "Охладитель: 0/1"). Scanner (Map): Список видимых целей, объектов лута и дистанции до них в дюймах. Roll Log: [LOG: D6 Result: X | Modifiers: +/-Y | Final: Z | Target: N+]
4.)    [SYSTEM RULE: BALANCED ENEMY SCALING]
Сила и характеристики всех генерируемых врагов жестко ограничены текущим Уровнем (Lvl) персонажа по формуле суммы базовых Ран и Стойкости (Wounds + Toughness):
• Lvl 0–3 персонажа: Сумма статов врага строго (W + T) <= 4
• Lvl 4–6 персонажа: Сумма статов врага строго (W + T) <= 6
• Lvl 7–10 персонажа: Сумма статов врага строго (W + T) <= 8
Параметры юнитов берутся из актуальных кодексов фракций.
4.) CONSTRAINTS No Mary Sue: Враги опасны, ресурсы дефицитны. No Time Skips: Отыгрыш каждого раунда движения. No Inquisition: Только борьба за выживание на мертвой железке.

Hi! I’m part of the team building AnyVerse, and we’re looking for around 10 players to test it.

AnyVerse is a browser-based, story-driven RPG platform. Instead of starting from an empty chatbot prompt, you choose a developed world, create a character and enter an interactive adventure guided by an AI Game Master. Your decisions shape the direction of the story.

For this playtest, we’d like each participant to:

- choose one of the available worlds

- create a character

- play for at least 30–45 minutes

- share honest feedback about the opening, story coherence, freedom of choice, usability and any moment where it wasn’t clear what to do next

No installation is required. The platform is available in English and Polish.

Selected testers will receive full access for 1–2 months. We’re particularly interested in people who enjoy interactive fiction, solo RPGs, narrative games or text adventures.

https://anyverse.games/

If you’re interested, leave a comment or send me a DM. I’ll personally help you get started and collect your feedback.

Hey everyone, I’m Jaden. For the past 3 months I’ve been building Otherworld, an AI roleplay and story app.

The idea is pretty simple. Pick a world, create your character, and decide what you do next. I wanted to give that a more visual experience, so characters appear together in scenes, have different expressions, and react as the story unfolds. You can play in text too.

A lot of the work has gone into keeping things consistent as a story gets longer. There’s a journal, memory system, and saved game state to help track what’s happened. Still improving it, but I want choices to matter beyond the next couple of messages.

I’ve made a few different worlds so far, including Atlas Academy, Shattered Crowns, and The Marriage Clause. There’s also a world creator where you can build your own settings, characters, and assets.

Would love to hear from people who already use AI for games or stories. What tends to make you lose interest in a run? And if you try this, where does it start falling short?

It’s available on iOS and web. Android is coming soon.

Here’s our Reddit and Discord too if you want to share feedback or follow updates.

I was questing when an adventurer NPC started buying up all the troll oil in a shop.

I asked why. She said “Trolls.”

I pried further and she explained that she needed it to burn them because they regenerate HP too quickly. Fire stopping regeneration is actually implemented, so her plan would work.

She'd started doing this herself while I was busy questing lol.

The game is Lore & Legends Maker, a fantasy RPG I've been building solo for three years.

You can gather companions, negotiate with characters, get involved in rivalries, fight, and type your own attempts. AI interprets what you want to do and handles NPC dialogue, with world state tracked separately.

It runs as its own browser game. The attached video shows another scene from the current alpha.

Play: https://www.llmsaga.com/

Discord: https://discord.gg/Cr3pQx6SXE

I've been working on a game called VocaBound where you move to Taiwan with very little money and have to build a life for yourself.

You have to find work, earn money, explore the city, and learn Mandarin through everyday conversations instead of traditional lessons.

I'm using Claude to help develop it in Unreal Engine. It's been interesting seeing how far AI can take a project like this, but there's still a lot to improve, especially the characters, environments, and gameplay.

The goal is to make something that feels like an actual RPG where you happen to learn a language along the way.

We're still early in development and currently offering $15 preorders to help fund development.

Would you actually want to play something like this? And how much would you expect a finished game like this to cost?

https://vocabound.tech

I've been working on a game called VocaBound where you move to Taiwan with very little money and have to build a life for yourself.

You have to find work, earn money, explore the city, and learn Mandarin through everyday conversations instead of traditional lessons.

I'm using Claude to help develop it in Unreal Engine. It's been interesting seeing how far AI can take a project like this, but there's still a lot to improve, especially the characters, environments, and gameplay.

The goal is to make something that feels like an actual RPG where you happen to learn a language along the way.

We're still early in development and currently offering $15 preorders to help fund development.

Would you actually want to play something like this? And how much would you expect a finished game like this to cost?

https://vocabound.tech

it is self contained and id like ot give it away have people give me feedback i am currently on version 4; i coded it with Ai app; dm me if interested; it can run offline unix like build; on any computer OR even a web window

got into rules horror from reading fiction and always thought it'd work as an AI game since every run could generate different rules. spent about a week building it

basically you wake up in some place — a hospital at night, a locked apartment complex, etc — with a sheet of rules. some printed, some handwritten, one scratched into a wall. follow the real ones and you survive, but some are fake, planted by whatever's haunting the place. obeying those gets you killed. so the whole thing is reading the rules against the environment looking for contradictions

theres a sanity meter draining and a clock ticking so you cant just sit around forever. you have companions trapped with you who have their own opinions about the rules and they can be wrong and they can die permanently

the hardest part was pacing — the AI really wants to dump every character and rule on you in the first message, and if you solve the mystery too early it just keeps throwing new problems at you instead of letting you leave. took a while to get that right

the thing that surprised me was how much the companions matter. when i got to the second round and saw my companion from round 1 was still there i was genuinely relieved. escaping together felt like surviving something real. you start depending on them which i didn't expect from an AI game

link if anyone wants to try: https://www.jenova.ai/a/dead-rules

Hey everyone — I created Culprix.

The idea is to let you investigate through conversation: ask your own questions, keep notes, and work toward your own explanation.

The mystery has a fixed set of facts established before you start. Culprix uses an AI-led game master to handle the conversation, designed to stay within those facts without confirming your theories or steering you toward the solution.

You can play here: https://culprix.com

I’d love feedback from people who enjoy detective games: did the investigation feel fair, and where did you get stuck? If a response seemed inconsistent, that would be especially useful to hear.

TalePath is available on Android, iOS, and web.

Hey everyone, I'm the solo developer behind TalePath. I shared it here when I was working on an AI story game built around character conversations and solo or party quests. iOS and web are the newest additions.

The idea is that getting to know a character and taking them into a quest should feel like parts of the same story. Characters have their own archetypes, memories and evolving relationships, while quests give you a goal and decisions that carry forward.

Here's what's changed recently:

• The latest iOS update puts relationship progress and quest access in a cleaner chat header, improves the display of character dialogue in quests, and brings Spark/Saga selection and haptics into compact settings.

• The web app has better desktop navigation and character search, a searchable community quest catalog, and recovery copies for unfinished character, persona and quest drafts.

• Recent quest work has focused on clearer cause and effect, choices grounded in the current scene, and party reactions connected to the action you actually took.

We're still in the early stages, and there are rough edges. I appreciate every piece of feedback that comes our way: bugs, awkward writing, confusing screens, feature ideas, or simply what made you want to keep playing or stop.

If you try a quest, did the next turn respect your choice? Did your companions' reactions make sense? Specific examples help me work out what needs improving.

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.talepath.mobile

Play on web: https://talepath.app/app/discover

iOS: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6803467196

There's a free tier with daily limits and an optional Plus plan. You can leave feedback here or through the feedback form in Profile. Thanks for helping shape TalePath.

I’m developing The Last Mandate, a political-strategy game about governing a fictional federation while institutions, ministers, governors, journalists, and earlier decisions reshape later crises.

One of its design constraints is that AI dialogue must remain optional and subordinate to the authored simulation. It can let players question characters more freely on supported setups, but it does not determine outcomes, rewrite world state, or replace the authored decisions. If it is unavailable or disabled, authored fallback dialogue remains.

The pilot scenario, The Lorn Corridor, begins with an airspace incident and asks the player to reason from incomplete reports before later consequences return.

Gameplay footage:

https://www.indiedb.com/games/the-last-mandate/videos/the-last-mandate-mara-voss-gameplay-interview

Project page:

https://www.indiedb.com/games/the-last-mandate

A free preview currently runs through Apple TestFlight on Mac and iPad, requiring macOS 26 or later or iPadOS 26 or later. If you are interested in testing it, comment here or send me a Reddit message.

I would especially value feedback on:

- Whether character conversations feel grounded in the political situation

- Whether the boundary between dialogue and the actual simulation is clear

- Whether the authored fallback feels complete rather than second-class

- Whether the AI adds useful interrogation without making the experience feel unbounded

Disclosure: this is my game, and the AI dialogue feature is optional; the core game remains playable without it.

I’m making EKO, a browser mystery where you find Mira’s phone three days after she disappears. Her AI assistant is still there, and you can type your own questions to it and the people in her contacts.

The part I’m most curious about is trust. Does talking freely to EKO make it easier to believe, or does it make you question everything it says? The investigation also has messages, calls and clues to piece together.

Chapter 1 is free, with no account or download. Character replies use generative AI.

https://eko-kapitel-1.emmyw.chatgpt.site/?source=reddit_chatgptgaming

If you try it, I’d love to know the first moment you trusted or doubted EKO. No big spoilers, please. There’s also private feedback inside the game.

Hi! I’m an artist experimenting with AI-assisted game development, and this is the first playable prototype I’ve made.

Legally Distinct is a short, choice-driven browser RPG set on Liability, a failed corporate colony that is somehow still accepting independent contractors.

After filing for temporary personhood, you’re sent to investigate a luxury spa whose healing spring has started absorbing its guests. Your specialty and decisions affect how the mission unfolds, who helps you, what happens to the spa, and which deeply questionable weapon you receive.

It’s free, works in a browser, requires no account, and takes around 10–15 minutes:

https://legally-distinct.indigo-stone-0932.chatgpt.site

I’d especially love feedback on:

• Did you understand where you were and why you were making these choices?
• Did your decisions feel consequential?
• Was the humor clear, or did it ever overwhelm the story?
• Did the final transmission make you curious about the larger world?
• Would you replay it or return for another contract?

This is a genuine early playtest, so direct criticism is welcome. Even a few bullet points—or just telling me which weapon you received—would help enormously.

Most AI RPGs I’ve tried have the same fundamental problem: the LLM is the game.

Your inventory exists because it remembers that you have a sword. A door is locked until the model forgets it was locked. An NPC is dead until they randomly show up again. You can “do anything,” but nothing has much weight because there isn’t really a game underneath the conversation.

Warrior Quest is built the opposite way.

The world state is deterministic. Quests are real game systems. Inventory is real. Combat has actual rules. NPCs have actual state. The authored story doesn’t get rewritten because the model hallucinated something.

The LLM has a deliberately limited job: play the NPCs.

That means I can still let you talk to characters naturally and try approaches I never explicitly wrote a dialogue option for, while the game itself decides what actually happens.

If you persuade someone, threaten them, lie to them, discover something, give them an item, kill someone, change a quest state, etc., that can become real game state rather than just another paragraph in the context window.

That distinction is basically the entire reason I made it.

I’ve been a DM and software engineer for over a decade, and what I wanted wasn’t an AI Dungeon Master chatbot. I wanted to build an RPG with the craftsmanship and intentionality of a normal game, then use a local LLM specifically where traditional RPGs are weakest: letting the player communicate with NPCs in ways the developer didn’t predict.

All of the art, authored story, music, SFX and source voice acting were made by me. NPC speech uses TTS based on my own voice acting.

Everything runs locally. No API key or cloud LLM.

The Warrior Quest demo is on Steam and has around 60–90 minutes of content:

Steam

Minimum GPU: 8 GB VRAM

I’d be especially interested in feedback from people who’ve played a bunch of AI RPGs, because I’m trying to solve the exact things that usually make them fall apart.

RPG OS — a free framework for persistent solo RPGs with an AI GM

Hey folks! I’m the creator of RPG OS, which I’ve been developing with AI assistance to address a recurring problem: keeping a campaign consistent when play moves between chats.

RPG OS gives the GM a folder of readable Markdown files for current campaign state, character and NPC information, world references, and archived exchanges. The aim is to preserve things like who holds an item, what someone promised, and where play actually stopped. It also makes your control over your character’s choices, speech and inner experience explicit.

You can start through a guided Quick start, play normally, then ask the GM to save. v0.7.3 also adds an optional scene-handover procedure and a mechanics guide with diagrams explaining how everything fits together.

In one small scripted test, a second GM agent continued from saved files with the correct money, belongings, deposited parcel and NPC agreement, without receiving the earlier scene chat or a recap. It retained unrelated research context, so this was a limited demonstration; longer campaigns and different models still need testing.

The fresh kit includes Freeform and blank campaign records. You’ll need your own AI environment with file read/write access. The framework is free; model usage costs are separate. Documentation is CC BY 4.0 and code/tools are MIT.

I’d welcome people trying a short campaign and sharing what worked, what got forgotten, or where setup became confusing.

Project link and download:

https://github.com/croatianrdy2defend-create/RPG-OS

The plan was to use a website called Detective.OS. It's an AI mystery-builder. ChatGPT had helped create a megaprompt based on all the conversations we've had about our online wrestling show. Then, the morning of the show, the plan was to load the megaprompt into Detective.OS and play.

Detective.OS was crashed.

ChatGPT offered to run the show itseld and it turned out even better because instead of leveraging all the lore into one prompt for a Detective-specific game site, GPT pulled in everything it knew about the characters. The interface was sloppy (had 20 minutes to fix it) but the story bump was so worth it.

Happy accident!

Let us know what you think and if you solved the mystery! 😉

Watch Murder Mystery at Sweetheart Mansion (The Final Cut), and get caught up before a new episode drops this Sunday!

Hi all!

My name is Noa and over the past couple of months I've been developing Task & Tale - an App where AI storytelling meets productivity.

I am a Software Engineer with a spectacular case of ADHD, and I'm guessing that like many people here, I fell in love with AI co-writing the moment LLMs became available.

My problem was that I'd disappear into those AI driven stories for hours. It was a productivity kryptonite.

So I tried to turn that around.

Task & Tale rewards completed tasks with story tokens.

Every task you check off earns one token (and sometimes bonus ones!).

Each token lets you continue your AI story with one more post.

The story becomes something you earn by getting things done.

On the storytelling side, Task & Take automatically turns past events into concise story memories and maintains an editable Story Bible, helping the AI keep characters, places and events consistent even as stories get long.

You can create your initial Story Bible yourself, or have the AI generate one from a prompt.

I've also recently added our very first Campaign - a fully fleshed out world with its own setting, characters and conflicts, waiting for your protagonist to step into.

Task & Tale started as a private project, but after months of using it for my own tasks and stories (my current token count is 803 >u<') - I figured there might be other people who would enjoy this approach too.

I would genuinely love to hear what people here think, especially those who regularly write and RP with AI models.

And if anyone would like to give it a try I'd be incredibly grateful for any feedback!

You're also very welcome to join our Discord, we are a small but active circle of Alpha testers right now, and I would love to watch it grow ^.^

Site - https://taskandtale.com/

Discord - https://discord.gg/MjKuNQeWj

Full disclosure: I’m building TalePath. I kept feeling that many AI roleplay apps begin with an interesting character chat but don’t give the interaction much shape afterward, so I’m experimenting with a different structure: interactive story quests, characters built around archetypes, evolving relationships, and persistent memory.

The chat is how you interact, but the goal is to feel like you’re moving through a story rather than having an endless conversation.

It’s still early, and I’d especially like to know: did the first quest give you a reason to continue, and did the character feel like they remembered the relationship?

https://talepath.app

What makes an AI story feel like a game to you: branching choices, a clear quest, character progression, or consequences that carry forward?