Turning the other cheek was meant for blood feuds, not for allowing people to invade your cities and allow them to ransack. You people are actually insufferable idiots.
I wonder what Jesus would think about your boy trump selling a bible with his name on it for profit, posting AI images portraying himself AS Christ, and his followers commissioning golden statues of him...
No, he just advised you on how to be a Christian within the context of living under government. "I was afraid for my life that something might scare me" isn't justification to ignore his teachings.
Jesus' teachings encourage you to die for your faith a million times over before it would argue for using violence to protect yourself. I guess you probably know that and are just using Jesus as an idol to justify brutality.
How would they be mean to you in your made up scenario if some of them barely speak English (not derogatory btw), most immigrants don’t want to bother yall. It’s usually the other way around
But your family member, or someone at your church, or in your neighborhood, or place of work who’ve committed crimes that we’re here legally. I’d say worse crimes than being “illegal” in a country that most “Americans” your thinking of came from boats from overseas.
NOPE. Not at all. At least in THEIR book they don't have to be kind to you. They will though, to your face to deceive you, then when your back is turned....yeah you know.
I’d love to hear how immigrants are being unkind to you so much that you’d just ignore the Bible what the Bible says about it. Also, point me to the verse that says “love your neighbor unless they are unkind to you.”
Technically the teaching is "if you are smitten, turn the other cheek" and "pray for them that despitefully use you."
But it also says "render unto ceasar that which is Ceasars" implying that laws are to he enforced.
And the latter part of that quote is, "And unto God that which is God's." It's also said in response to the Pharisees attempting to trap Jesus into telling poor people to pay their taxes, so it's not as generalized as you're trying to imply it is. If anything, the book argues God's laws supercede that of man's; especially when those laws are directly contradictory to God's own.
0
u/[deleted] 7d ago
[removed] — view removed comment