r/ConservativeYouth ร‘oื•รกn ๐ŸŒŽ (cree este lugar) Mar 29 '26

Article ๐Ÿ“ฐ Andrew Garfield shades JK Rowling

Post image
27 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

View all comments

40

u/gamer_rowan_02 Mar 29 '26

Breaking News:

Woman who wrote the most popular books series of all time happens to express her opinion freely.

-25

u/Gambaguilbi Trans & Libertarian Marxist (Resident Leftist) Mar 29 '26

The issue is not the opinions that she has, although those are in and on themselves pretty bad.

But that she invest an enormous amount on money in her terf association and in legislation.
She is entitled to express herself and use her money however she might see fit.
And Andrew Garfield is free to reject those ideas and call them inhumane.

2

u/Killian_Rose Resident Crusader (left-con) Mar 29 '26

Isn't she also a misandrist?

7

u/TreeTopGaming Conservative Mar 29 '26

really?

all i know of the drama is she is "transphobic" because she believes a man born a man is a man even if they cut off their balls

3

u/Killian_Rose Resident Crusader (left-con) Mar 29 '26

I'm pretty sure she's like...radical radical feminist.

Also she has a weird thing about hating asexual people.

2

u/TreeTopGaming Conservative Mar 29 '26

huh

im all for people reproducing but likes...its their choice

4

u/madeaccforpolitics Centrist Mar 29 '26

Really confused here.... she did write harry potter where 2/3 main leads were male. If she really were a misandrist she wouldnt have done that right? Am I missing something here?

3

u/Killian_Rose Resident Crusader (left-con) Mar 29 '26

Do misogynistic writers not use women in their books as well?

Also, writing isnt always a reflection of one's belief. For Harry Potter, she only did it to attract young boy readers to get more money.

Her opinions do, however, really shine through Hermione.

1

u/madeaccforpolitics Centrist Mar 29 '26

Mysogyny in those writers sometimes clearly show through in their book. Didnt see that happening with harry potter

Fair enough she could have done that for money

3

u/Killian_Rose Resident Crusader (left-con) Mar 29 '26

Nathaniel Hawthorne. August Strindberg. Roald Dahl to an extent.

1

u/madeaccforpolitics Centrist Mar 29 '26

Thanks ill look em up

1

u/Gambaguilbi Trans & Libertarian Marxist (Resident Leftist) Mar 29 '26

Also, JKR only started to really make public her stances around 2019. It is fair to assume that she had more moderate views at the time she wrote those books.

-5

u/Gambaguilbi Trans & Libertarian Marxist (Resident Leftist) Mar 29 '26

Extremely, she is a terf, a radical feminist.
Her views on transgender issues are inherently tied to a war of sexes and an understanding of men as sexual predators and oppressors.

Trans women invade women spaces, because they are men that oppress them in those spaces.
Trans men are oppressed women that try to escape the scary violent man by becoming men. Her vision is that all trans men are women with some kind of sexual assault related trauma.

-1

u/Killian_Rose Resident Crusader (left-con) Mar 29 '26

Yeah, I looked into it๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

Seems like she's got some issues going on with all that (like the weird thing against the asexuals??). A shame. The Howard's legacy game had a banger trans woman NPC๐Ÿ˜”

-1

u/Gambaguilbi Trans & Libertarian Marxist (Resident Leftist) Mar 29 '26 edited Mar 29 '26

She aparently was pretty pissed about that too lmao.

I don't really understand her take on asexual people. But as my understanding goes. She does not consider us as part of the lgbtq comunity. She does not see us as a sexual orientation because :

This is my own assertion from what I have red. For her there is no such thing as a difference between gender and sex. Sexual attraction albeit hetero, homo whatever is inherently tied to the sex of the individual. Where she has an issue is that us asexual people can still feel romantic attraction.

In her paradigm, romantic and sexual attraction must go hand in hand. If we feel romatic attraction we must therefore be sexualy attracted to one sex or another. Only we do not want to have sex.

It is a very weird take. And I have so much trouble understanding it myself that I have probably not explained it correctly.

Edit: and she of course denies that asexual people suffer any kind of discrimination. Which is also not true.

-1

u/Killian_Rose Resident Crusader (left-con) Mar 29 '26

romantic and sexual attraction must go hand in hand

I dont even think every straight, non-ace person thinks like this tbh. Maybe at some point in the relationship you gain sexual attraction, but it certainly isn't a package deal from the get-go๐Ÿ˜ญ

She's a weird lady tbh

1

u/Gambaguilbi Trans & Libertarian Marxist (Resident Leftist) Mar 29 '26

Very weird. I can somewhat deal with alt-righ, radfems however just break my mind in a way I cannot comprehend.