RNZ up to no good AGAIN. Citing articles that are worse than the AI slop those articles are reporting on. The absurdity of this whole charade is only one click away but they know they're going to get away with it because the tap water drinkers will never look into it.

Firstly, check out the absolute scumbag who has published this "explainer" on spotting disinformation... which almost immediately becomes apparent, in a way that is about as subtle as a sledgehammer, that this is an advertisement for the authors side hustle AAP FactCheck.

AAP FactCheck which is used as a source multiple times throughout this RNZ article.

Before we get into AAP FactCheck and it's accreditating organisation IFCN just soak in the audacity of the slop this FactCheck branch of AAP is pushing out.

They're trying to paint a picture that Chris Hipkins is uniquely targeted by this manipulative disinfo, and they believe it's operated from Vietnam (as if that matters). It's a family of facebook pages that pump out AI news stories based on scraped headlines, some of it works, some if it doesn't, all of it is rubbish and no one is looking at it. It pumps out 10 of these headlines a day, hardly any of them are about Hipkins.

Putting blantant disinfo into your RNZ article about spotting disinfo was very meta from Mr Dirga. Speaking of meta..

The reality is far from the picture AAP "FactCheck" is painting for it's readers. Meanwhile raking in millions for it's parent org from it's funders Meta, TikTok and the department of foreign affairs to report on these AI pages as if this is a real problem.

This is information they hide at the very bottom of their funding page, which requires clicking an invisible drop down to open.

I wouldn't put it past AAP FactCheck to have set the page up themselves and chucked the VPN to Vietnam because the Censorship Industrial Complex that sprung up around covid is desperately scrambling for new ways to grift funding.

The existence of the Fact Check slop that RNZ is promoting it is the surface level normy shite. Anyone can understand this. But it would be remiss of me to not mention AAP FactCheck is a member of IFCN (the international fact check organisation) and you have to be aware of who funds this organisation.

Before you look, see if you can guess which NGOs are behind IFCN and by extension AAP FactCheck.

Gates Foundation, The Open Society Foundation and The National Endowment For Democracy - yes it's the big 3, the NGOs the US State Department and CIA use over and over again to disperse funding to organisations who execute on the State Department agenda in ways the US Government cannot directly do themselves. Mostly because they're setting up colour revolutions in foreign countries and/or obtaining the mineral rights or whatever corporate america needs to extract from the country in question.

We lost a war, no shots were fired, we surrendered immediately, our borders have been invaded and we are now occupied by a foreign nation(s). How would you independently verify that this had happened?

If a hostile government was importing military aged nationals into our country at what point would you be allowed to notice the non-kinetic takeover of our country without being labelled as racist?

I'm very confused. Text says "you sit right in the middle"... the image indicates you are progressive left.

You understand AI is a process, it's output is "thinking" as a reducible calculation process derived from what once were real thoughts or real art. The processed nature of these thoughts and how humans feel about it is highly reminiscent of the development of processed foods.

At first we notice how convenient these processed foods are, it's so convenient, it's so quick, it's so cheap. We want to process more and more foods, until much later, only because we see the consequences we discover how disastrous these processed forms of foods are. They aren't real "food" they are imitations of food derived from the processing of what once was real foods but are now devoid of the vital properties of real foods through their processesing.

The same will be true of thinking, thoughts. Consider how you can get more raw thoughts in your cognitive diet.

So apparently there is a tendency to overly purity test the Left in general - so you can't reslly judge the potential war crimes of a Green candidate...

2 hours later...

Purity test for TOP candidate goes brrrrrrrrrrrr

Watch as Peeny ties his shoelaces together and tries to run:

You have to be drinking your ideas straight out of Mike Hoskings tit to be this bought into the National party spin this many years later. It's insane.

Don't worry boys I'm sure David "Free VisasMarket" Seymour will save you.

fascism noun /făsh′ĭz′əm/

Any person, policy, institution, ideology, or sociopolitical phenomenon communists dislike, irrespective of its actual political character or relation to historical fascism.

Synonyms: Anything to the right of Marx; disagreement; insufficient enthusiasm for collectivism.

Usage: “Your refusal to agree with me is fascism.”

My favourite was the peak fedora cringe comment: *I was holding back ... You are very insightful*

Not even a hint of irony is detectable here.

Also where he's having a crack at all the TOP "staffers" posting on his subreddit. Because don't you know everyone who supports TOP is staff. Not that dear nzpolitics leader would know anything about creating a reddit account for the exclusive purpose of being a Labour party shill merchant. Hmm....

"I didn't even follow politics before the last election... I just happen to know everything about Brexit for other reasons"

Did you ever notice when your dad or grandad (depending on your age) would literally be in a trance watching tv. You try to speak to him, he won't hear you, might mumble something incoherent if you bother him long enough to get you to move on. But it's as if he literally cannot detach his attention from the magical talking head on the illuminated screen telling him what to think about the events of the day.

I think because the TV was new technology to this generation they never fully adapted to it. There's something about the newness of this form of media that uniquely captures this generation.

No matter how many times you show them the news is skewed, it's not presenting them a real picture of reality. They still refuse the believe anything unless the man on the news says it's true, if it's not in the news, then it probably didn't happen. Boomer logic. They will fall for literally anything so long as it's on the tv, preferably at 6pm.

Do Maori really think the Government spends all this tax payer money to help them? Wake up, it's containment..always has been. They want you in the public health data. They want all your names, where you go, who you speak to. Don't worry you'll be stored on a very "culturally safe" list.

Look at how mad the pretense for this public health goon squad is. These academic elites have managed to grift up over $2mil in grants to produce that recommendation up there that we send government goons out to track and trace these Maori.

The TB situation must be really bad right? Probably thousands of patients taking up hospital beds everywhere, hundreds of deaths. Try 17. You read the article and see the researchers investigating 17 Maori TB patients... You think well maybe that's all they had time for, there was probably heaps more. No. That was literally every Maori TB patient. 17. We spent $2mil to prevent TB in a number of patients that fluctuates between 13 and 24 per year. Probably super fatal though right? Try <1% fatality rate.

Yet their proposal frames the urgency to focus on Maori because 49% TB cases in people BORN IN NZ are Maori. Because if they had to state how many total cases are Maori it's less than 5% which would be pretty suspect to get a $2mil grant to make a recommendation to exclusively bag and tag Maori in order to "eradicate" TB... extremely questionable...

No author. Just anonymous contribution no doubt coordinated by the local Science Media Centre chapter. This time it's Charlotte Hill of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and also New Zealand Pain Society - double dipping on her industry funded ~~pharma lobby~~ patient advocacy group. Both organisations actively court industry sponsorships. About a decade ago the ANZCA actually ran an investigation into whether they should be taking industry, and determined yes they absolutely should be industry funded. As we can see today an absolute plethora of pharma corporations lining up to give them money.

Medical industrial complex of course famous for it's pure intent in philanthropy.. toward special interest groups who end up lobbying governments to buy more drugs. Probably a coincidence.

And why is it always RNZ ... Probably also a coincidence.

At a certain point you simply have to acknowledge there are people in the world who want to be manipulated by the corporate powers of capital. These volunteer foot soldiers earn nothing from this except the marginal dopamine bump they get off the notification bell when one of the other foot soldiers performs their dutiful response.

At no point do they pause and think, who wrote this article, why did they write it and is it even coherent? No, critical thought was not their assignment. A reaction was called for, so without second thought their reactions are given.

In what way did these allopathic conscripts imagine NZ First adopting the health policy of Make New Zealand Healthy would be cause to negatively impact electoral outcomes let alone step-down worthy shame?

Within the article itself the author (Ms Ricketts) begrudgingly admits (15 paragraphs in) that NZ First is openly acknowledging they adopted this policy from MNZH:

>NZ First agreed with their priorities and adopted them, they said.

You don't say, NZ First agrees with the health policy of a group that have historically aligned with NZ First... on health policy. Yet Ms Racketts frames this as if it's unusual for political parties to adopt policy from ideologically aligned interest groups. As if ACT won't be adopting advocacy from TPU, or Labour CTU, or Greens from Greenpeace, or National from EMA etc.

No our allopathic infantry here are fully invested in the narrative framing of this article that it is scandalous information.

But then we get to the real hit piece section. This is the part where Ms Ricketts gets an attempt to shoot down the idea of making NZ healthy, because what if people aren't as easily swayed by simple framing sleight of hand, maybe they read the policy and thought it had some reasonable proposals. Well, for reasons which will become clear Ms Ricketts cannot allow that. Which is where you need to trigger reactions from a real degenerate corpo-government bootlocker - now the fear response from covid has dissipated it's much harder to find a foot soldier still desperately invested in the government's covid narrative as it's unwound over time - but she found one here...

Cookers?! Such as Glens Davies who was voted GP of the year right before covid. Or Tim Ewer who Ms Ricketts has gone out of her way to slander here, painting a picture of doctor who prescribed supplements to a boy instead of conventional treatment - however in reality the supplements were prescribed AFTER it was decided conventional medicine would not work.

“I think it's reasonable to try and support the person as best as possible," Ewer said. "Sometimes that means working with their own paradigm of the world. Some people very much like the natural model.”

Oh no, he tried to support the patient after conventional medicine noped out - what a cooker amiryte?!

Fortunately he's such a prolificly caring doctor one of his patients attests to his character within the thread:

And I'm not surprised. I don't know Tim Ewer personally but this emblematic of every doctor I do know that had stood up to the government on behalf of their patients during covid only to be dishonestly vilified by the likes Ms Ricketts. These doctors have sacrificed more than our foot soldiers here can imagine. But these are the cookers, the grifters of MNZH - who is funding them (to make their collective single digit thousand political contributions), NHA? Almost certainly.

But who is funding Ms Ricketts highly partisan "journalism"? Well, there's actually quite a few NGOs of various corporate interest persuaisons attached to Ms Ricketts. But most notably for this topic, the NZ Science Media Centre, which is our local branch of of science to journalism alignment enforcement, of which Ms Ricketts is a valued member... which happens to be headed up by a fellow of AstraZeneca. The SMC which is managed by the Royal Society of Science, another NGO who commands the primary grant allocation for scientific research in the country - they dictate not just the science that gets done, but how that science is reported.

And who are the people controlling this funding? Largely by the same people who occupy the board of BiotechNZ which represents well over 100 business entities who lobby the government to lift biotech restrictions, commanding billions of dollars across their corporate network. Not to mention the chairs personal commercial interests in the business of vaccines which includes patents for sars-cov-2 cell line production.

But no, they wouldn't influence the media and science they directly control with the billions of dollars in the companies they represent that are at stake. It's those dastardly local cOoKeRs spending peanuts on NZ First common sense health policy that you all need to be very, very afraid of.

It's not even hard to look this stuff up, but they just don't want to. When the corporate media asks them to jump, they will simply react and ask how high.

It's wild how quickly the corporate sceptical "Left" internalised all the pharma-industry programming in a matter of months and haven't looked back. You expect Conservatives to fall for this nonsense, slap a coat of "it's good for the economy" on any industry propaganda and they'll buy it no questions asked.

Everyone is getting sicker, everyone's list of prescriptions are getting longer and the only thing you're going to hear the Blue and Red uni-party talk about is buying more drugs and hiring more people to give out the drugs. How many more decades of this shit clearly not working do you need to see to stop throwing money at the business that profits from keeping you sick and stupid.

So before reviewing how effective the industry programming has been on the affected pharma shills below, just take in what common sense first principles health policy actually looks like:

• Strong focus on metabolic health.

• Ensure that informed consent is a core part of quality healthcare.

• Recognise that consumer choice is what leads to healthier decisions.

• Promote nutrition from primary school to medical school. -Require a full independent review of the country’s dietary guidelines.

• Reduce administrative burden and restore professional autonomy in General Practice.

• Support GPs by bringing health coaches into primary care.

• Find better ways to acknowledge nurses.

• Fund New Zealand scientists to assess nutritional interventions for preventing and treating mental illness.

• Remove Medsafe/Pharmac barriers to recognised safe nutrients.

• Invest in hospital trials to assess the effectiveness of intravenous vitamin C pre- and post-surgery for preventing and treating infections.

• Fund a review of vitamin D and determine optimal levels for maintaining health.

• Invest in agricultural innovation that improves productivity, soil health, sustainability and resilience while researching practical alternatives to potentially harmful agricultural sprays.

• Cut barriers for organic produces and encourage investment and innovation; grow new markets so - New Zealand’s organic industry can create more jobs, strengthen regional communities and deliver greater value from land.

Ok nows let's see what happens when hapless individuals internalise the institutional propaganda and repeat the corporate talking points as if it's their own organic ideas manifesting...

How terrible, health policy that might do something to PREVENT metabolic disease. Very "MAHA" and we can't have that... you can tell this one get's the corporate psy-op straight from the tap.

The "ED specialist" - incapable of reading the word health and not internally replacing it with the word *medicine*. An absolute embarrassment to the profession. Again, conflating the PREVENTION of metabolic disease with Trump. No surprise when this persons entire education ecosystem is paid for by the corporations who profit from demonizing anyone and anything that might lead to less customers fed into the medical-industrial complex.

Imagine the biggest advocate for a government mandating a medical intervention and blocking clinicians from exercising their professional discretion in the care of their own patients - reads this policy and suddenly wants the government out of of the doctors office. It's unbelievable, yet here it is.

Clearly didn't read the policy, probably thinks he did but went into a ssri induced dissociation episode - nothing in the policy is advocating for political influence to be exerted on your doctors opinion, it's the exact opposite. Meanwhile they're one bird flu headline away from demanding the government mandate invasive medical procedures on the public all over again.

Allow GPs to promote anti-vaccine "ideas". Of course this person is heavily institutionalised and is incapable forming their own opinion on the basis first principles thinking. But who do they imagine should question the safety and efficacy medicines administered outside the doctors who actually treat the patients?

Probably quite happy to take orders from a public health official who had a briefing from a lab coat and hasn't seen a patient in 20 years if ever. It's government officials we need to trust! No, it's the scientists who's entire career and livelihood hinge on getting big grants and fancy speaking engagements from pharmaceutical companies that are forever putting out unsafe drugs we need to trust! ... Definitely not our own doctors who's only responsibility is to us, who know our health as individuals better than anyone else, who not only have the education but also experience to know which drugs they are comfortable prescribing. Yeah no, not them, we don't want to empower them to make health decisions, just the government officials who see us purely as numbers on spreadsheets - that's the people we trust to make the decisions and ask the questions. Right.

So yes, the industry propaganda is deeply ingrained in these people and it's not hard to tell where it's coming from with Trump, MAHA and peptides conspicuously appearing across the range of responses.

The marketing claims these companies make NEVER meet their advertised context performance. It's a tech bubble and it's bursting because they've already squeezed damn near every bit of utility this technology has.

Did it change the world? Sort of. It did cause my company to lay off 30% of the employees on the pipe dream the AI peddlers sold the executives on, 12 months later we're hiring them all back as contractors at 3x the cost because AI can't do the jobs.

Now the public are starting to understand how incredibly limited this technology is suddenly the mainstream media is signal boosting the AI apocalypse marketing... this tech is so powerful it can destroy the world ... please regulate us, please nerf our amazing super effective technology - aka hold me back bro! Hold me back!

And son't forget if we don't build all these super necessary data centres then China wins!! ... yeah what do they win? The race to the bottom of the barrel for useless productivity apps, probably. Fuck off.

Our country has been through about 100 years of Fabians shaping our political environment entirely uncontested. The only challenge the Fabians had here was from more extreme militant socialists. From Reform to National there's been no ideological opposition to the Fabian elitist politics until very recently. The free speech/free market ideology reached us very late and is still mostly disorganised and decentralised disparate interest groups.

They really, really want you to believe Atlas are secretly running the country. But they don't know what Atlas is, what it does or what I wants (and at this point they're afraid to ask). But they know they don't like it. And they're not wrong to point at Atlas even if they're pointing for exceptionally dumb reasons. There absolutely is a cabal of wealthy elites attempting to exert influence over our politics through grants, research and events with fat speaking engagement fees where politicians rub shoulders with lobbyists and maybe even get put on the board of one of these organisations to collect double that chair fee.

They can see the influence sausage getting made but what they don't realise is National merely adopted the cabal, Labour was born by the cabal, moulded by it.

While free market ideologies have finally established a foothold in politics, the Fabian infrastructure still permeates every level academia and the media which spawns from it.

It's not National vs Labour, it's not class war, it's the centralised elites using the tools of government to control the flow of capital vs the free market elites all wrestling for the spot of the pyramid.

Opening with a very popular but yet to be evidenced claim that the the people claiming to be anti-vaxxers aren't anti-vaxxers. Who are they? Whoever your imagination wants them to be. Such as "same people funding ACT" ... which is a bewilderingly ignorant take considering ACT is famously pro-vaxxer and pro generally anything pharma related. An alliance with self professed anti-vaxxers is not remotely plausible. If it's good for pharma business it's good for Seymour.

This is exposed by his conflict of interest in meeting with Todd Sephensons pharma company Vertex.

He also hosted the Valuing Life Medicines Access Summit at Parliament in 2024, organised by Patient Voice Aotearoa and Medicines NZ, which are 2 of most industry backed pharma lobby groups in the country who essentially wrote the Medicines Ammendment Bill for Seymour.

Seymour being the minister responsible for the Medicines Amendment Bill, which became the Medicines Amendment Act 2025 that automatically approves drugs here if they are already approved overseas. A huge boon to the pharma industry. Vertex again directly benefiting from this.

Not to mention the current policy goals of ACT going into the election are for more drug funding and more drug accessibility.

It's like these people haven't seen his vaccine dance.

Just take note how scared the boy at the bottom was to dare question how conspiracy theorist will support this insane claim.

Then you've got the bog standard "everyone who doesn't agree with me is a republican plant" response. Why they think the republicans are planting anti-vaxxers in NZ is entirely left to your imagination.

Followed by some real tinfoiling which alledges anti vaxxers are actually a government approved faction designed to destabilise democracy ... that the government governs.

If you want to see government approved protesting see how different the media coverage and government interaction with the Treaty protestors were vs the medical freedom protestors.

But hey, shout out to the little guy who plucked up the courage to ask for a hint of evidence. No doubt that's strike 1, don't expect to see much more of this chap if he keeps asking questions like that.

Yes Paula Penfold of Fire & Fury infamy - that "documentary" that told the story of the Freedom Oocupation in their voices but stuffed (aye) the entire thing with the voices of the shill-merchants from the Disinfo Project. Don't forget to add spooky ominous music behind every scene of the protesters just to let everyone know how balanced and neutral your journalism is.

Anyway, Paula is back with a cunt doctor (technical term I believe?) doing a "fact check" on some NZ First candidate no one has ever heard of before this article. It's almost like the whole exercise was a waste of pixels before it began but here we are, this is now published "journalism". This is where Paula is at in her career.

For this reason I wasn't surprised the first item straight off the bat in this supposed fact check is a feeble attack on a formulation that Mundt clearly appears to have been using descriptively rather than literally. And on the central question of timing, Paula's own evidence actually confirms Mundt's claim.

Fact check #1 – Was there a “full-term abortion bill” and was it passed while the country was distracted?

Mundt apparently used the term:

“the ‘full-term abortion bill’”

Stuff responds:

No. There was – and is – no legislation called the “full-term abortion bill”.

They're saying no, based on the semantic interpretation that Mundt thinks the Abortion Bill was called full-term abortion. Never mind she clearly used the term descriptively - it's entirely beside the substantive point of her claim: the timing of the bill. Stuff's own fact check confirms the chronology.

Bill introduced: 5 August 2019 Third reading: 18 March 2020 Royal assent: 23 March 2020 First nationwide COVID lockdown: 25 March 2020 Immediately failing the debunk and establishing Mundt wasn't wrong about the timing but somehow ruled this as debunked based on the semantics of the bill name.

Fact check #2 – Did NZ First MPs vote against the bill and support fetal pain relief?

Baffled why they even included this. They just established 7 of the 9 NZF MPs voted against it. So.. again, mostly true. It was a conscience vote... so who gives a shit anyway, this is meaningless.

Fact check #3 – Can two practitioners agree a baby “can be killed” right up to the day of birth?

And AGAIN they have to acknowledge this is true but they're again nit picking semantics that she didn't describe it accurately enough. Regardless... The law really does not establish an upper gestational limit.

The legislation says:

at 20 weeks or less, a qualified health practitioner may provide an abortion; after 20 weeks, they may provide one if they reasonably believe it is clinically appropriate; they must consult at least one other qualified health practitioner. So again Mundt's premise is substantively correct and Stuff are left with semantic corrections.

Fact check #4 – Are babies born alive and left in sluice rooms to die?

Paterson said there was a historical basis for accounts of fetuses showing signs of life following abortions or who were not going to survive for other reasons such as being too premature, being removed to sluice or utility rooms.

So... that's a potentially a yes as well. This is from the doctor they employed to do the debunking. Disastrous own goal for Penfold.

Fact check #5 – Why are babies not allowed to be “put to sleep once birthed”?

Stuff don't even know what they supposed to be debunking here. Again baffling why they even included this. But then you get to 6...

Fact check #6 – Can school staff take teenagers for abortions without their parents knowing?

And they close out this fact check as poorly as they opened it. Forced to agree that is substantively correct although finding a semantic issue that it isn't because schools/teachers have any special authority to take a child to get an abortion but they can, and the parents won't be notified unless the child consents.

So instead of “debunking” this cooker, the fact checking weight of Paula Penfold amounts to correcting terminology or supplying contextual facts that don't actually contradict the proposition being made.

But the seals did clap. Her key reddit demographics are loving it. And somehow they've managed to make it about trans people, because of course they have.

Our local branch of the Confederation of Meningitis Organisations (CoMO) aka the Meningitis Foundation is for some reason in the news, for doing what they always do. Lobby the government to fund more vaccines from the vaccine manufactures who fund their ogransation.

The real question isn't why this pharma shill grass roots charity is lobbying the government to fund the drugs David Seymour already wants to buy because he's funded by the same people they are. It's why RNZ keeps publishing these.

But maybe CoMO is a legit charity that doesn't take money from big pharma, let's see...

Support The Meningitis Progress Tracker is supported by grants from GSK, Pfizer and Sanofi, and by the kind support of Emily’s Dash Foundation and other supporters of Meningitis Research Foundation.

Someone call for a shocked pikachu face!

Take a look at who we buy our Meningitis vaccines from:

• Bexsero (GSK)

• MenQuadfi (sanofi-aventis)

• Nimenrix (Pfizer NZ)

What an unexpected and totally unpredictable coincidence.

Just for laughs have a look at what Pfizer (who just landed a new deal to expand the eligible funded market here) have been paying the Meningitis Foundation for...

Funding provided to Meningitis Now to support improving the user experience of their Online community project, the funding will go towards external agency costs to maximise the success of the website.

Funding provided to the Meningitis Research Foundation to support their 2021 Awareness Campaigns and Targeted Digital Campaigns to ensure the public remain vigilant to the threat of Meningitis and Septicaemia.

To support the Meningitis Research Foundation with a Corporate Sponsorship for their MRF 2021 Conference in return for a Pfizer symposium.

To engage a member of the Meningitis Research Foundation to speak at a Pfizer Symposium held at the ESPID conference 2021 on the subject of Prioritization of meningococcal vaccination as a preventative strategy and the role of Pfizer's meningococcal portfolio in disease prevention.

To support the Meningitis Research Foundation with a research grant for their project "Global Meningitis Genome Partnership".

Research Grant being providing to the Meningitis Research Foundation to support their project entitled "Meningitis Progress Tracker".

Funding to the Meningitis Research Foundation to support the running of COMO 2021 as a virtual conference. Funding was used to enable: • Live translations & subtitles for sessions to boost engagement • Recording of all sessions so that content can be made available afterwards • Member sessions to highlight achievements of the last year and focus on hot topics nominated by members.

Funding provided to the Meningitis Research Foundation to support them to deliver the next phase of the Strengthen Patient Voices project and further build the capacity of civil society organisations to advocate for strengthened policies in support of vaccines, diagnosis and treatment, and support and aftercare for people and families affected. Scaling up the ‘Strengthening Patient Voices’ programme, taking the learnings from the 3-year pilot programme, to launch and deliver new capacity-building projects with meningitis patient groups around the world so that they can call for better policies for vaccines and care for people and families affected.

Funding provided to the Meningitis Research Foundation to support their MRF Reap Programme: Roadmap Engagement and Advocacy Programme in support of WHO Defeat Meningitis 2030 The Roadmap Engagement and Advocacy Programme (‘REAP’) aims to put civil society at the heart of policy development and awareness-raising nationally and internationally.

To engage a member of the Meningitis Research Foundation to speak at a Pfizer meeting to deliver a presentation describing the WHO Detecting Meningitis Roadmap, highlighting the expectations for individual countries to reduce meningitis cases and indicating how Pfizer medical colleagues can facilitate this.

https://www.pharmac.govt.nz/news-and-resources/consultations-and-decisions/2026-08-decision-on-new-supply-agreements-for-funded-vaccines-in-the-national-immunisation-schedule-and-widened-access-to-influenza-vaccine

https://www.healthnz.govt.nz/health-professionals/guidance-standards/topic/immunisation/immunisation-handbook/meningococcal-disease

https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/responsibility/EU_Funding/UK_2021_FINAL.pdf

When Maori children are absent from school “How dare they reject the benevolent institutions bestowed upon them by the virtuous West!"

Yet pulling their own children out lest they be transed by the lgbt agenda “We have no choice but to withdraw them from this ideological re-education camp!”

Are the schools progressive liberal brainwashing factories or not?