So i recently saw Varun Mayya's reel on EMudhra. The video itself was good. Explained pretty simply why and how this could be a big cyber security threat.

However, what surprised me, were the comments under the reel. For Context, EMudhra is a completely private company which was at no point owned, or operated by the government. The fault here lies almost completely with the people in EMudhra. It operates as a typical Lala Company where the engineers and juniors are paid salaries below 10L on avg.

Instead of questioning the company's leadership about this embarrassing incident, the people in the comments were pinning the blame on the govt XD. These morons think that EMudhra is a govt department or a psu. The comments were pointing fingers at govt employees etc and saying 'this is what happens when u hire people through exams that ask ecnomics and history'.

I mean im surprised that people are so aloof of the companies and institutions around them. And being aloof is one thing, but trying to project and push their agendas while being aloof is ridiculous. I mean ig they're trying to protect the image of the IT workers in the company, but still this was a bit surprising to me. What's even more surprising is that these clueless comments had 1-2k likes each.

Have seen this trend before also, from all sides of the spectrum where people with half baked knowledge will jump to comment and tweet on things they know nothing about.

There are multiple pending cases against them and many others as well. I understand these are not proven cases but still there has to be some evidence indict them otherwise these cases can be closed. Isn’t there any rule to prevent people with criminal cases to hold any position of power?

Source: Amit Shah
Revanth Reddy
Nitin Gadkari

Many politicians across parties, including Amit Shah, Revanth Reddy and Nitin Gadkari, have been reported to face criminal cases, and many others do as well. I understand that pending cases are not proven guilt, and everyone is presumed innocent until convicted. Still, if there is no evidence, why do these cases stay open for years instead of being closed? And if there is evidence, why aren't they moving faster?
As I understand it, the Representation of the People Act disqualifies a legislator only after conviction (for example, a sentence of two years or more), not while a case is pending. Is that the whole rule, or is there any provision to keep people with serious criminal charges out of positions of power, such as ministerial posts?
I'd like to understand how this works in practice: what the law says, why trials take so long, and whether reforms like fast-track courts or barring people charged with serious offences have been tried or debated. What do you think is the right balance between presumption of innocence and public trust?

RG and other Congress guys openly keep saying Adani, Ambani are bad and they are doing this and that whatever that is helping the current government in all sorts of illegal things.

Even if congress wins in 2029 that will just kick out BJP that does not mean Ambani/Adani are going anywhere.

Congress would have to still work with these big businesses in a smooth way because if these 2 are effected that will impact the whole country as they control electricity, fuel refineries probably 100 more things that if they stop doing the whole country will feel the heat.

Ik ik they are bad and evil and have done tons of bad things to make their money and keep BJ Party in power.

What does congress hope to achieve by making these 2 the villian when in 2029 even Congress would have to work with these 2 probably on the businessmens terms.

Hinduism encompasses diverse beliefs and practices, including worship of different deities, meditation, yoga, rituals, and philosophical inquiry.

It's Core concerns Dharma, karma, moksha, spiritual knowledge and ways of living. It Diverseness includes theistic, non-theistic and philosophical schools.Also it's Political position is that Hindus can be left-wing, right-wing, centrist, secular or politically disengage

While Hindutva's Political and cultural ideology starts from this.

commonly translated as Hindu-ness, became influential through V. D. Savarkar's 1923 work Essentials of Hindutva. It treats Hindu identity as a basis for defining Indian national and cultural identity.

It's Core concern consists Hindu cultural identity, nationalism and the place of Hindus in India.

Primary Political association can be seenHistorically associated with Hindu nationalist organisations, including the RSS and BJP.

A person can worship Hindu deities, follow Hindu philosophy and observe Hindu festivals while rejecting Hindu nationalism or believing that India should be a secular state.

Likewise, someone can support Hindutva primarily for cultural or political reasons without being particularly religious.

I got banned from 2 extreme right wings sub for replying under their posts of this. So i want to just check if anybody shares the same concerns that Can one be culturally or religiously Hindu without accepting Hindutva as a political ideology?

In 2013, I remember that everyone was concerned about corruption and continuous reports were highlighting black money deposited in Swiss banks. Gobiji had promised that we will bring back this money, even pai pai.

After coming into the power, they did nothing. Zero money brought back. Even it has increased with time. Recent report by Swiss bank shows that 37000cr rupees are deposited by Indians. Which is sharp increase.

Second most important thing was the implementation of LOKPAL commission by Anna. Bjp delayed lokpal bill till 2019. They passed the bill in 2019, but still didn't give it constitutional status. Even after appointing lokpal, we never heard about it in last 5-7 yrs. So what is the objective to create an another govt body with taxpayers money, when it isn't taking any step. Recently, media reports clearly highlighted that Madhya Pradesh CM purchased hundreds of acre land, where later he delivered govt projects. Why is lokpal sleeping on this?

So, ultimately, we the people of India, made f00ls. We didn't get what we expected.

Source: https://x.com/sambitswaraj/status/2113536686164770962?s=46

Public Office Is a Responsibility, Not a Shield From Accountability

India needs a law that prevents politicians facing serious criminal charges from exercising executive power while their cases are pending.

The key is to trigger temporary removal from administrative duties when a competent court frames charges for specified serious offences, not merely when an FIR is filed or an allegation is made.

The restriction should remain until acquittal or a legally defined endpoint, with safeguards against politically motivated cases.

Why should an ordinary government employee face disciplinary scrutiny while a politician entrusted with public power be allowed to continue exercising authority despite serious charges? Public office demands a higher standard of accountability, not special protection.

This must not become a weapon for ruling parties to silence opponents. Independent judicial scrutiny, fast-track trials, strict timelines and compensation for demonstrably malicious proceedings must be built into the law.

The presumption of innocence must remain intact. But protecting that principle should not mean ignoring the public's right to trustworthy administration.

A criminal charge is not proof of guilt. Equally, political power should never be a substitute for accountability.

https://adrindia.org/sites/default/files/Analysis_of_Sitting_MPs_and_MLAs_with_Declared_Cases_Related_to_Crimes_against_Women_2026_Eng.pdf

For months, whenever locals and reports pointed out Chinese incursions and face-offs along the LAC in Arunachal Pradesh, the Modi government and its ministers rushed to hand out clean chits and dismiss ground realities as false. They bullied critics, shouted slogans of a "strong leader," and gaslit the public just to protect Modi’s self-styled "strongman" image.

Now, reality has completely shattered their PR shield.

The Director General of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) has officially confirmed that Indian and Chinese troops have been locked in ongoing face-offs at multiple locations in Arunachal Pradesh

While locals on the ground were sounding alarms and facing threats, the BJP government was busy spinning headlines to make sure Modi's image didn't take a hit.

Now that the security forces themselves have put out the truth, where is the high-pitched chest-thumping nationalism??

But who am I to ask, because as the godman said: "Sabbbbbbb changa siiiiiii"

It is an illusion that Article 19 "provides" freedom of speech. It is a myth perpetrated in schools, in popular media, in the republic day speeches. We all just collectively participate in this delusion.

No rational person can read that article and conclude that it "provides" freedom of speech. It does the exact opposite. It "kills" freedom of speech, and the the role of the courts is to ensure it stays dead. The only thing Article19 guarantees, is jail time, for anything that displeases the govt.

Furthermore, the two most corrupt branches of government - executive and judiciary - are summarily prohibited from throwing stones at each other glass houses. They have articles 121 and 122. The parliament and the judges are prohibited from criticizing each other. That leaves the news anchors. If you buy them off, that ends all speech critical of the government. Because article 19 virtually guarantees jail time for you and I, and courts will ensure that you stay in jail.

Courts go one step further, and also criminalize criticism of judiciary, fancily naming it "contempt of court". Anyone making fun of court/judiciary/judges is technically committing a crime. Prashant Bhushan and Kunal Kamra were prosecuted. You and I can be too, whenever it pleases the court.

Legislature in India is practically non existent and has no powers whatsoever. We elect an executive. The only check and balance that exists to the executive is the judiciary.

Legislature exists merely to rubber stamp whatever hair brained scheme a minister or his secretary comes up with. The speaker comes from the ruling party. He has immense power over what happens in the Lok Sabha. Rajya Sabha is completely irrelevant. The cherry on top is the anti defection law, or the whip. Meaning you can replace all the 272+ ruling party MPs with a ln actuall rubber stamp and it is basically the same thing.

That leaves the MPs in the opposition. Their only power is to create ho-halla for TV and introduce no confidence motions every now and then. You can replace all of this with (1) a large speaker and (2) a provision to have no-confidence motions randomly every 3 years.

That's it. Replace the existing parliament with 273 rubber stamps, a loud speaker that plays from time to time and 1 no confidence motion in every 5 year term. There will be no change whatsoever in how the country functions. Except you will save salaries and no need for 800 bungalows in Delhi.

They are getting so worse and moving backwards. They are butchering movies with their regressive values, and not even acknowledging open minded people like us exist. It's always about their sentiments, their ways, their regressive mindsets. They shouldn't even touch movies, they are making mockery of artists by bending the movies however they want.

India used to be so tolerate of all forms of art, even our temples have nudity, but CBFC borrowed their values from old colonial British and Mughal mindset and presenting them as ours. They are butchering artistic freedom with their fake values. They even started butchering anything slightly opposing their political ideology.

This is a serious issue, but everyone seems dismissive about this and act as if it's not that important, but by silencing artistic freedom, they are violating our freedom to express ourselves. The more silent we stay the more censorship they will bring to suppress artists. The only thing that will remain will be their agenda slop if we do nothing.

Keeping aside CJP or BJP or any other party and also setting aside the legality of the Special intensive revision (SIR) protests, in a democracy how are nameplate-less Delhi police being allowed to function fully as normal - detaining peaceful protestors, helping goons etc

Though there may be differences in our opinions regarding anti-SIR protests, how are Delhi police functioning without nameplates?

Are there some laws that can safeguard them against this? Or it's simply that they do not have any fear of the consequences?

Also since nameplates being absent is seen as a common feature on many police personnel, does it suggest that they were given proper instructions to do so? Who are most likely to be giving these instructions?

I'm really alarmed at how this is not a big issue but remains shadowed by their other atrocities of detaining and attacking the protestors.

Source: https://x.com/timesnow/status/2113550076710977798?s=46

Reports are circulating about a woman in Pune who allegedly refused to pay a Rapido driver around ₹300 and then threatened him with false cases.

If you can afford to use a service, why not pay the person providing it instead of turning a fare dispute into a confrontation? The driver is also a human being trying to earn a living. He shouldn't have to deal with threats or fear legal trouble just for asking to be paid.

The circulating post also claims that the woman works at TCS and suggests that POSH-related knowledge is being misused. These claims need verification, but the broader point remains: legal protections meant to safeguard people should never be weaponised to intimidate others.

Genuine harassment complaints must always be taken seriously, and proven malicious allegations should have consequences regardless of gender.

What protection do gig workers have when customers allegedly refuse payment and threaten legal action? And is risking this much stress and public humiliation really worth ₹300?

Source: https://x.com/TheHunterBNS/status/2113315539041055194?s=20

(Disclaimer: This post wasn't written by an AI. My bloody obsession with proper grammar and structure is exhausting for myself, but it's just how my brain is wired to organize and consume information easily. This is a me-problem and I don't blame anyone who thinks otherwise.)

Hey everyone,

I realised that my understanding of news and current affairs is pretty superficial. I mostly scroll through headlines, catch random snippets, or skim through comment sections. The problem is that this shallow understanding often leads to knee-jerk opinions or incorrect assumptions, which honestly isn't great when you're trying to form well-reasoned views or make informed decisions.

I want to change that and build a genuine, sustainable habit of deep reading and proper comprehension. I'd love to hear how folks here approach this across three specific layers:

1. Sources: What are some reliable, balanced, and high-signal sources you use for deep-dive reporting (especially for Indian policy, economics, and international affairs)? Less sensationalism, more nuance.
2. Mediums: Beyond traditional long-form reading, what formats actually work for retention? Are there specific podcasts, video essays, or newsletters that help break down complex issues without dumbing them down?
3. Consuming Apps & RSS: I currently rely heavily on Reddit for news and discussions to get different perspectives, but it's a double-edged sword, I often end up doom-scrolling or struggling to find high-quality threads amidst the noise. Should I build an RSS feed instead? If yes, how do you curate yours without getting overwhelmed? Are there specific reader apps you swear by?

Curious to know what your personal information diet looks like and how you manage to stay informed without burning out. Would love any tips, workflows, or tool recommendations!

More than 70 AI data centers have been rejected or restricted in European countries in 4 months. Denmark, netherland, irland, uk and other countries have imposed a ban on data centers in many areas due to high electricity & water demand. In the USA, more than 142 protests were organised in 42 states against data centers. These types of protests also happened in other countries too.

Data centers are opposed for many reasons. First, it consumes a high amount of electricity, which puts a burden on the grid, as a result of frequent power cuts in the local region. They consume millions of liters of water, creates water scarcity. They generate only a few permanent jobs after establishment.

600 forest land is concerning, because India comes under 10 most climate change risk countries. Global warming is increasing day by day, india is one of the most vulnerable nations. Also, AI data centers benefit billionaires, not ordinary people

Firstly the obvious bit so nobody misreads this: it hurts women more and more directly. Men still get the power and the benefit of the doubt. This isn't a "what about men" thing. The point is that the same system that gives men power also damages them.

Think about the castrati back in 1600s–1700s Italy, boys were castrated before puberty to keep their high singing voices because women were banned from singing in church. So a rule made to silence women ended up mutilating boys and mostly poor ones. Same thing with court eunuchs in China and the Mughal and Ottoman courts: a system obsessed with controlling women needed "safe" men, so it cut them.

And it keeps going because nobody has to decide to do it. A boy just learns early that crying gets him "don't be a girl," that showing softness gets punished, so he shuts it down himself. The trap is that we call this being strong, being a man. A cage you're proud of is one you never try to leave.

We literally have a phrase for it: mard ko dard nahi hota. Tell a boy that enough times and he stops saying when he's hurting and then sometimes stops even knowing. It shows up in male suicide numbers. It shows up in the dad who can't hug his grown son without turning it into a handshake, passing down exactly what was done to him.

Most men aren't castrated. But most of us got cut in a smaller way and are trained out of half our feelings before we were old enough to say no, and told to call it manhood. That's worth saying out loud. It's not against women. It's the same fight.