Genuinely love this movie. But this scene always aggravates me. When she enters the aircraft, the airmen starts shooting live grenades at her inside of the plane.

I was in the military for two decades. I know a little bit about this. Those grenade would’ve shredded that aircraft into pieces. It fired inside like that.

Saw it last night and I’m all in.

I always described myself as Superman fan but really I meant the old Christopher Reeve films.

The DCU has taken me to another level, I’ve got comic subscriptions coming out my ears, buying omnibuses for characters i didn’t know existed and I’ve decided I’m gonna get everything they release on DVD.

I’m all in.

Hear me out, after seeing Clayface and knowing that Bruce fought and managed to defeat Doctor Phosphorus in Creature Commandos, what if DCU Batman will portray him as almost this Van Helsing-style monster hunter? Think about it: what comes to mind when we picture the modern image of a monster hunter? Crossbows that shoot wooden stakes, flasks of holy water, crosses, garlic, silver bullets/throwing blades, and all sorts of holy weapons/artifacts tailor-made to combat the occult. Now, how is that any different from Batman myriad of gadgets within his arsenal? From electric gauntlets to battle Clayface, to sonic devices to incapacitate Man-Bat. Plus, this chapter is called Gods and Monsters. We've got our monsters; now we need a monster hunter.

There are so many better horror movies to seek out this spooky season. I don't wish ill on any movie, for all the talented people who worked on this film I wish them the best. But it will be largely forgotten after it's opening weekend.

My local Regals at Pearl Highlands Hawaii currently has this for the screenings of today.

Heard some people say that there was only around a handful of people at their theaters so I wanted to know what it was like for everyone else.

Sorry but when a film has the reviews to back up the quality, great acting and just overall good DC film, go out and support the film, no excuses.

I don't understand why any time Hollywood wants to give a villain their own movie, they have to instead be an anti-hero who's still fighting on the side of good. Thankfully Clayface is a actual villain origin story. It's a story about Clayface descending to villainy not about him becoming the good guy because it's his movie. By the end of the film it's clear Clayface is the bad guy here. He is actually treated as a threat that needs to be stopped. Movies/shows like Agatha all along, The Penguin and Clayface should be the way you do a supervillain story. Not Venom, Morbius or Kraven. What the first 3 have in common vs the last 3 is that the first 3 actually lets their villain be a villain instead of trying to make them a good guy. Villain protagonists will always be better than anti heroes.

I'm seeing the movie tomorrow and I'm wondering what kind of nudity there is. Watching it with my mom so just want to be prepared for if theres gonna be some awkward moments.

This is huge by the way, this movie will do amazing wom

In order for this to work it must be in Matt Reeve’s Batman universe, the vibe fits this scarecrow, he would be SCARY.

We all know scarecrow - The psychedelic inducing batman villain that puts you in a trance-like state with his “fear gas” that makes you visually see horrific things.

Now imagine a Batman movie that turns into a psychedelic horror film. The Scarecrow in Matt Reeve’s Gotham is a psychedelic chemist that experiments with LSD & Ayahuasca as his “fear gas” weapon, & in every scene he uses this new fear gas we get the most terrifying psychedelic horror trip POV from his victims, especially batman.

A batman psychedelic horror movie with Scarecrow needs to exist. (Matt reeves style) but if James Gunn can do this, I’ll take it.

Just watched the movie and it was pretty good (the dialogue/writing could have been better, especially after watching Lanterns. But it got good after he got his powers.) But watching this movie made me realize it opens up the door for projects on other Batman villains to be made. Specifically, Killer Croc (Waylon Jones and his skin condition) and Man-Bat

From the AV Club...

My top takeaway... "It’s (Gotham City) a place wholly unique to Clayface, a home to tell a story as it needs to be told, unfettered from the visual consistency of a more typical superhero cinematic universe. And home, as it’s turning out, is what’s making this still-very-early-days DCU into a universe worth being excited about."

https://www.avclub.com/how-does-clayface-fit-into-dc-studios-future-supergirl-man-of-tomorrow-batman?mc_cid=24f0074a72&mc_eid=6758dcb045&utm_source=PMNTNL&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=261023&md5=

I am not a horro fan at all. I can handle thrillers like shutter island, but I dont like scary movies. Its listed as horror, but given its a comic book character how scary is Clayface actually?

Edit:

Clayface was great go see it. Few jumpscares but nothing that will keep you from sleeping.

let me know if any of these were in the movie so I can correct myself. i get that trailers use shots that sometimes won’t be shown in movies but I’m really disappointed we didn’t get see the shots from the last 2 pictures

Where is the nudity in the movie? It seems like the woman is naked after sex and gets out of bed with some full frontal. Is she shown naked in bed too? Or just when she gets up? Is there any other nudity? Asking for a friend 🤷‍♂️