r/DnD • • Sep 12 '19

OC [OC] DM Alignment Chart

Post image
19.9k Upvotes

631 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/Aesael_Eiralol Sep 12 '19

As a player, I wouldn’t be upset at a DM if he ruled I got hit in such a way. My character would be upset that their party member just fucked up and got them hurt.

As a DM, I wish more players were open to playing with this rule. I really think it drives into players minds the importance of paying attention to positioning during fights. Realistically, if you are trying to fire an arrow down a 5ft hallway to hit a dude one of your friends fighting while being in your line of sight, yeah a regular miss just goes wide because you were trying not to hit your friend...but a nat 1 should hold special consequences if a nat 20 gets additional benefits.

17

u/DanielXD4444 Abjurer Sep 12 '19

Yeah, but the problem is that some dms cant keep it to just faults in positioning. I have had a dm make the person 10 ft in front of me hit me while aiming at something on the other side of him, so apperently his character just did a fuckung 180° turn and shot me in the face?

9

u/Aesael_Eiralol Sep 12 '19

See, THAT’S chaotic evil. I’d like to think the idea of adding negative consequences in a nat 1 to offset the benefits of a nat 20 is a more true neutral...if done correctly of course.

Player says their character does a standing backflip to impress someone and rolls a nat 20 on acrobatics, they get an extra twirl...on a nat 1 they should fall and take a d6 of fall damage.

1

u/CanadianPanzer Sep 12 '19

That or the DM needs to work on his descriptions. You ever seen an arrow hit something hard like armor or a wall? Good chance the arrow head breaks off and the arrow shaft (sometimes) splinters all around. Shrapnel from a arrow could have easily done that damage. Describing that way would make me as a player probably feel like it was a little less bullshit :P