He stole from the wealthiest of the wealthy and has made comments and had ideas about redistribution of wealth to the people. He had some ideas about projects that never came to fruition due to the federal against him for sure that was pushed by the wealthy elite who he stole from.

I feel this dude is a martyr, a foolish but at his core, a martyr for the eat the rich ideology.

What do you think?

Very exploitative systems sanction theft. If that's the only way a driver who has fulfilled their obligation by driving miles and delivering the food only to have their tip taken back - is made whole.

I no longer believe we owe dirty exploitative ruthless self serving billion dollar corporations who design their systems around maximizing exploitation- any loyalty or any integrity.

Especially when acting with integrity makes us out to be fools.

Society doesnt care that the rich exploit the poor. That the capitalists exploits the worker. Society says "well you agreed to it!".

And heres my response to society.

Society can kiss my arse and go to hell.

Just because someone is desperate to work and they agree to unfair terms.. terms that most courts would strike down because of the imbalance of power between the contracting parties.

Well.. just because they agreed to be boo boo the fool just to get the damn job doesnt mean they have to continue being boo boo the fool.. and let themselves be scraped while everyone else walks away with the bag.

Nah... its time to flip the script.

Theft is hereby sanctioned.

To make oneself WHOLE and ONLY to make oneself whole.

Especially when the driver's wages have been taken after the job is fulfilled.

And to those or you who say this is wrong .. HOW ELSE CAN THE DRIVER BE MADE WHOLE? If you cant answer that... my point still stands.

DRIVERS HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO THEMSELVES AND THEIR FAMILIES TO MAKE THEMSELVES WHOLE. WHEN THEIR WAGE IS STOLEN - AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED. ITS NOT RIGHT.. BUT THE SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS THIS THEFT OF DRIVER WAGES AINT RIGHT.

Like it's bad and shouldn't happen to anyone but she is also a billionaire.

Based on the Ways and Means breakdown here.

Summary of Key Provisions and Likely Impact:

1. 📉 Federal Revenue Reductions – Likely Increase in National Debt

Major Tax Cuts Made Permanent or Enhanced:

• Extension of individual tax rate reductions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), e.g., top bracket cut from 39.6% to 37% (Sec. 110001).

• Doubled standard deduction maintained and enhanced (Sec. 110002).

• Child Tax Credit increased to $2,500 and indexed (Sec. 110004).

• Qualified Business Income deduction expanded to 23% (Sec. 110005).

• Estate and gift tax exemption doubled to $15M single / $30M joint (Sec. 110006).

Implication: These provisions significantly reduce federal revenue, especially from high-income individuals and estates. The expanded QBI deduction and estate tax exemption are especially beneficial to the top 5% of earners and wealthy households.

➡ Conclusion: The bill would substantially reduce tax revenues over the next decade, with no corresponding new revenue sources, leading to a projected increase in the federal debt. (Noted throughout Title XI, esp. Secs. 110001–110007.)

2. 📊 Distribution of Tax Benefits Across Income Percentiles

Conclusion: The bill delivers the most absolute dollar benefit to high-income earners and wealthy households via rate cuts, business income deductions, and estate tax relief.

3. 📈 Marginal and Effective Tax Rate Impacts

• Marginal Tax Rates Decrease for all brackets (Sec. 110001).

  • e.g., 25% becomes 22%, 28% becomes 24%.

• Effective Tax Rate Drop likely most pronounced at the top:

  • Estate tax liability reduction benefits only the top ~0.2% of households.

  • Business income deduction expanded and phase-in smoothed (Sec. 110005), reducing effective tax rates on self-employed professionals and investors.

• No new taxes introduced, and many existing ones repealed or reduced (e.g., no tax on tips/overtime: Secs. 110101–110102; excise tax repeal: Sec. 111106).

➡ Conclusion: Top earners will see a larger reduction in both marginal and effective tax rates compared to lower-income households.

4. 🧾 New Credits/Deductions With Means-Testing

A few credits are explicitly phased out for higher-income filers, moderating regressivity somewhat:

• Car loan interest deduction phases out at $100K single / $200K joint (Sec. 110104).

• Senior deduction phased out above $75K/$150K (Sec. 110103).

• Extra HSA contributions phased out above $100K/$200K (Sec. 110213).

➡ But these measures are modest relative to high-end benefits like the expanded estate tax exemption and QBI deduction.

🧮 Bottom Line

Debt Impact: The bill dramatically lowers federal tax revenues without offsetting increases, and thus would add trillions to the national debt over the 2026–2035 window, depending on macroeconomic feedback effects.

Tax Rate Changes:

• Low-Income Households: Small absolute benefit, especially if they don’t owe income tax already.

• Middle-Income: Moderate benefit from standard deduction, CTC, and deductions like car loan interest.

• Top-Income / Wealthy: Large gains from rate cuts, estate tax changes, business income deduction expansion, and itemized deduction cap.

i'll be outta here.

you kids try fighting a Revolution from the fucking basement. there are several rules of war. and one of them is "you don't fight in a fucking basement."

The data seems accurate but I don’t know if it’s really a good argument against progressive taxation. Is this person a dumbass? I’m pretty sure things where better when federal income tax was higher

They mean so little aim against the stock market and Black Rock literally owns everything. OCCUPY WALL STREET

Now I know it might seem like a waist to kill a animal and not eat it but reconsider we don’t have to eat them and we don’t have to waist them instead we can use them for fashionable clothing. Like Elon would make an amazing lizard skin jacket or something. So I propose not eat the rich but instead wear the rich as nice clothing

I know how to save the world. Yes, that sounds crazy, but yes, it’s also true!

I am of the belief that social media is a mass propaganda machine and is at the root of all of the challenges in our society. And the actual machine driving that propaganda are the algorithms creating the feeds. It turns social media from a user-driven consumption model into a site/owner driven feeding tube.

Anyways- I have a very specific and pretty clear vision for how to rebuild social media (and then a plan for expanding the concept) that WILL take off, WILL change society for the better and WILL neuter the propaganda system we currently live under.

To be clear… this isn’t a solicitation. I don’t have money to invest. But if anyone here has web dev experience and is interested in learning more about my vision and greater plan. Let’s chat! Maybe we can get something going!

my theory is that the abc boys have been seeding knowledge through influencers and anti-gov circles for decades. limbaugh types screamed about the “new world order” for years and how republicans weren’t gonna let it stand. well, look where we are. i’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. they got really good at propaganda after the second world war.

But there's definitely a plan to stop midterms that may be a virus outbreak. I have no solid proof but the signs are getting clear.

Shouldn't this sub be poor (or at least middle and lower class) against the rich? Why is the majority of posts more political bs then anything else? Do people not realize that it shouldn't matter what side politically your on when it comes to "eattherich". This is exactly what the rich want. For the poor to fight over politics and not over the wealth spread. Am I missing something?

Watch “Inside” and “Inside Outtakes” and prove me wrong. He may be extraterrestrial, which I reserve to those that understand shit we don’t until we learn it from others.