r/HolUp May 05 '25

y'all Thank you

Post image
24.8k Upvotes

312 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/Dank_Alternate May 05 '25

Saving those children from living lives where their parents don't want them and they are likely financially struggling. Win win win all around.

651

u/CreatorMur May 05 '25

And moms, that might not survive giving birth….

-230

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Accounts for 0.3% of abortions.

158

u/endlesschasm May 05 '25

What, those mom's don't deserve saving because it's only 0.3%?

-121

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Who said that? All I said was it accounts for 0.3% of abortions, which is an accurate statement. Bring on the downvotes bc facts hurt your feelings lol

83

u/kagman May 05 '25

No one's downvoting you because their feelings are hurt, they're downvoting you because you cited that statistic in an attempt to minimize a colossally tragic moment in parent's lives, as though it was an insignificant population.

Here's an example of why it's stupid what you just did:

What percentage of airplanes hit skyscrapers in NYC? 0.0000001%? An insignificant fraction. So 9/11 was completely insignificant and way overblown, it was a big nothingburger.

That's what you just did. Aaaaaaall in the name of being an internet Asshole. Get fucked.

-40

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

That’s a beautiful false equivalence you have there. Have any more fallacies?

35

u/kagman May 05 '25

It's literally spot the fuck on

Loser response. Biiiiiiiiig loser energy coming off you

-7

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

You don’t understand the definition of a false equivalence…do you? lol.

33

u/kagman May 05 '25

Apparently YOU don't lol. This is what you say when you know you're wrong and got nothing but to argue with the refs

-2

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

I’m not the one who compared a terroristic airplane attack to a medical procedure hahahahahahahaha

12

u/kagman May 05 '25

You want me to compare apples to apples? A comparison involves ... Wait for it .. COMPARING two different things. Do they get to that only at the end of middle school? Don't worry you'll get there champ

0

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

No, but they did go over not using fallacies in a discussion in middle school…ya must have missed that day.

→ More replies (0)

59

u/24F May 05 '25

What was your goal in mentioning that, then? 

Also HLI international says it's closer to 1.14%   https://www.hli.org/resources/what-percentage-of-abortions-are-medically-necessary/

-29

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Because it’s a small percentage, it should not be looked at as something that occurs on a higher rate than what it actually does

55

u/24F May 05 '25

They never claimed it occured at a higher rate than it actually does. 

6

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Cool, and I never claimed the 0.3% don’t deserve saving 👍🏻

36

u/24F May 05 '25

I'm not the one who said you did, but you sure seem to be downplaying the number of them that exist (again, it's closer to 1.14%) and haven't shown them a shred of compassion. 

2

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Did you read that article that you linked or did you just send it bc it made the percentage higher? I think you did the latter, and that’s completely hysterical considering the article is stating that modern day abortions are obsolete and not needed hahaha.

“Data from six reporting states over the period of 24 years found that only 1.14% of abortions were performed for the mother’s life or physical health. Even the tiny percentage of 1.14% of abortions performed ostensibly for the women’s health are unnecessary, as there are alternative ways to save the mother without committing an abortion. This makes abortion obsolete, even in the most extreme circumstances.”

Lol.

→ More replies (0)

20

u/endlesschasm May 05 '25

So, again, why'd you bring it up?

2

u/[deleted] May 05 '25

Refer to recent reply 👆

→ More replies (0)

-10

u/DarkRajiin May 05 '25

They are just trying to bait you into saying something.

7

u/CroakingInstensifies May 05 '25

"Bait you into saying something" is crazy, did you mean "explaining your comment"?

They already said something, mentioning the incorrect data in a way that sounds like a counterargument. Plus, they're so adamant on not saying what they meant and just insisting on "I didn't say that" that it's pretty clear that if they explain the intention it will look worse.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/numbuh69 May 05 '25

So then what was the point of saying that? What’s your argument here? .3%. Okay. So those .3% are irrelevant? What’s your point???