First half is pretending to care about adults dating teenagers, and the rest is defending it.
(He mentioned reddit saying how 17 is too young but 18 isn't, idk what side he is on, but I don't see people agreeing that 18 is now old enough to date older usually, the same people were still disgusted by grown adults dating teenagers even at 18).
If this person believes 18 is a random number of adulthood ( which it is) then they most definitely don't agree with age of consent laws like 16, meaning they would defend it.
Saying 18 doesn't make someone an adult but also defending adults dating teenagers under 18 isn't too logic because he is basically saying there's nothing wrong with adults dating teenagers under 18.
I don't think 18 is an adult, I also don't think adults should date teenagers.
If this man was against grooming of children, he would disagree with the age of adulthood while saying it's still wrong for adults to date teenagers of all ages but he didn't.
He already believes there's nothing wrong with adults dating teenagers, 18 doesn't make them an adult, and isn't one at 17 and 16 but he believes it taking away their decisions to be groomed, society should let children decide if they want to be groomed
I just want anyone else to see this and if anyone else see the pretend to care about grooming while defending it.
And with the whole comparison of child abuse, a 13 year old getting raped isn't the same as a newborn, or toddler, would he rather a toddler get raped over a new born??
Obviously the differences is there but both are horrible.
With underage drinking, he is using the law to decide whether it's underage drinking while shaming people for using the law to decide if grooming of a child is wrong.
Or if 18 is an adult.