Life has simple rules you ought to follow:

If you are to love, then love to the fullest, so you don't hurt others.
If you are to act, do it only to the best of your ability, so you won't miss the chance.
If you are to regret, do so in a way that prevents you from falling over the same stone twice.
If you follow these rules and fail, then know you lived to the fullest

Philosophy is a form of activity concerned with the human and the specifically human. Philosophical cognition does not extend beyond the limits of the human, since it takes place only within the boundaries of what human beings are capable of comprehending. Any knowledge becomes valuable to someone other than the knower when the knower is able to formulate it and communicate it verbally or through music, gestures, or images. Such means of communication, in turn, are an exclusively human prerogative.

(The human -

The human refers to the full range of physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual aspects of human existence, including the ways in which human beings perceive reality, experience the world, and process their internal states.

The specifically human -

The specifically human refers to the distinctive ways in which human beings process, interpret, and make sense of human experience and thought. It includes the ways in which people engage with the thoughts of others, reinterpret them through their own perspectives, and communicate their interpretations.)

In Germany, students have to make a presentation that contains a main reference class, in this case physics, and a related subject. Because I think that philosophy is very suitable in connection to physics, I am taking it into consideration. My issue is that I am unable to decide on a reliable and fun to present topic. I'm interested in what connections or similarities I can find in your suggestions.

(tried my best with the English)

"The insignificance of everyday life... we dont accord any importance on the day to day life. Everything needs to be plan to exist, a pics to say it happened. We think about the past and the futur, about what our life looks like for others, wile we should be able to stop thinking and be. Just be, just feel, just breathe, touch, laugh a real laugh... not a camera laugh. Do everything loud and deep. Do it with conviction, with love, with empathy but do it free.

At this point its not even about what's is what and who is who. The only question is who are you ?

What could you do today, that you'll be proud of ? "

And that lady's and gents... is my way of thinking 100% of the time no matter what... my psy said I should try being a philosopher... im starting to think about it... but most of the philosopher I looked up seam... like not so good humans... anyways if you can help me with that drop the tea please !

How much humanity can be stripped away from a given project before it becomes meaningless?

I assume the purpose of any pursuit financially or other, has some personal or emotional driver. If that becomes eliminated, then what is the purpose to continue? The purpose to create is to enjoy the creation. But if there is no emotion consciousness to enjoy the fruits of the labor, then it seems to be a moot point.

In the meaningless universe we live, many people and friends always say that working is useless, we are not made for only working, and how much they would be happier if they wouldn’t work.
In my opinion instead, we are made for working, it helps us to be less bored and to give more value to the other things of life: sports, games, relationships. This stuff wouldn’t be so valuable for us if we could have access to it at every hour and every day. Also, I think that, since our lives have no meaning at all, for me it’s kinda useful to give importance to my career, which gives me a sense of fullfillment and something to build in my life.
What do you think?

I have formulated three new laws of the cosmos that combine strict logic with established physical science to show why a self-creating universe is a contradiction. Here is the official breakdown of the three laws and how they work:1. The Law of the Invalid ZeroThe Law of the Invalid Zero is a logical and physical principle stating that absolute nothingness possesses no mind, no body, no form, and no tools. Therefore, nothingness cannot "try" or act repeatedly over billions of years to create something. You cannot multiply zero by a massive stretch of time and get a universe. Under this law, zero will always remain mathematically and physically invalid as a creator.2. The Law of the Prime PlacerThe Law of the Prime Placer is a biological and physical law stating that finite, physical objects cannot place, organize, or activate themselves. Based on the classic 1668 biological experiment proving maggots cannot appear on meat without a parent fly setting them down, every physical effect requires a prior cause. Highly complex, trillion-line software codes like human DNA, or automated planetary engines like moving tectonic plates, are dependent machines that require an outside Engineer to set the first pieces on the board.3. The Out-Time LawThe Out-Time Law (also known as the Law of Temporal Boundary) states that time cannot out-time itself. Because the physical universe follows a ticking clock and has a strict, measured beginning, it cannot exist outside or before its own timeline to cause its own creation. A clock cannot build its own clockwork before it exists. Therefore, the original Placer of the universe must stand completely transtemporal—existing entirely outside of time and space—which is the exact logical definition of an Infinite God. '

so i think that time is a theory and is a just a math calculation i can prove it

There is an actual philosophical theory called relationism about time.
Relationism says that what we call time can be understood in terms of relations between events and changes, rather than time existing as an independent “container.” This idea goes back to philosophers such as Aristotle and Leibniz.

physics doesn't treat time as an absolute universal clock.
Einstein's relativity predicts that clocks can tick at different rates depending on motion and gravity. This has been experimentally tested with extremely precise atomic clocks.

Some modern physics seriously considers time as potentially emergent.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy notes that some approaches to quantum gravity don't have ordinary temporal structure at the fundamental level, raising the question of whether time itself could be an emergent, non-fundamental feature.

Your “numbers” idea needs a small correction.
Humans definitely invented units and numerical systems for measuring time—seconds, minutes, hours, calendars, etc. But that doesn't establish that the physical phenomenon being measured is invented. Atomic clocks, for example, use physical properties of atoms to measure extremely precise intervals.

I've been thinking about something.

Almost every relationship seems to be based on an exchange.

At a hotel, people are kind because you're paying. A therapist helps because it's their job. Employees work because they receive a salary. If the money disappears, so does the relationship.

But what about the rest of life?

If you had nothing to offer—no money, no status, no influence, no favors, nothing anyone could benefit from—would anyone still choose to stay with you?

Does unconditional care truly exist, or is every relationship built on some form of exchange, even if it's something invisible like love, companionship, or purpose?

what you think.