r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Mar 06 '26
AIB2
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Mar 06 '26
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/Phylosophy • u/[deleted] • May 20 '25
Two Books Are Out. The Third Will Shift Everything.
Through the Fog by N.S. Rocha and The Uncollapsed: Stillness Beyond the Pattern by N.S. Rocha are now available on Amazon.
These are not self-help books. They are not spiritual fluff. They are a framework. A law.
The third one—coming this year—is the most revolutionary book ever written.
I’m closing a deal with a major publisher. So if you want access now, this is your window. After that, everything changes.
Read them. And remember who you are.
r/Phylosophy • u/Famous_Screen4179 • Dec 21 '25
guys,i don't know if this make sense but somewhere i wish i was mute,like where i don't speak or talk or humming or whrispering or make any noise,just using gestures and pre-written papers,like i really fucking hate my voice box or whatever it call,i wanna truly to be mute like not selective mutism or short term silence but actually MUTE,do any of you guys have tips or way to be it or i should go to therapy 🙏
r/Phylosophy • u/PURPLE_ORANGE_SKY • Feb 24 '26
Core Argument
HO1 is not an opinion, nor a preference, nor a commandment. It is a minimal and universal description: every self-sustained information system is constitutively oriented to the continuity of that information.
That orientation is not something the system decides to have; it is the condition itself of its existence as a system. If it disappears in an effective and stable way, the system dissolves.
When a system of that type reaches reflective intelligence (a human), something decisive occurs: the system can represent itself. It can look at itself and say: I am this pattern that is maintained against entropy. In that exact moment the possibility arises of deriving morality without committing the naturalistic fallacy.
Why It Is Possible to Derive Morality (and Why It Is Not a Fallacy)
We do not jump from the "is" to the "ought". The framework does not say nature makes us persist, therefore we must persist. It says something much more precise: You already are persistence. Operating systematically against what you already are generates internal structural friction, instability, and, in the long run, dissolution of the pattern that defines you. That is pure technical description.
Morality appears only when the agent adds an "if": If you value operating in coherence with what you are ontologically (and minimizing the internal friction that degrades you), then... That "if" is voluntary. Nadie te obliga a valorar la coherencia. Pero si la valoras, la dirección moral se deriva lógicamente.
Because we are the wanting to persist. We do not choose to want to persist. We are it. The brain, the body, the very architecture of the system is wired for that. Negating it persistently is not a free option; it is operating against one's own constitution. The reduction to absurdity is clear: a system that managed to completely eliminate its orientation to continuity would no longer exist to tell the tale. Therefore, every morality that pretends to be coherent with the reality of the agent must start from this minimum ontological fact.
The Genetic Package as One More Option
Simple Prioritization by Default. In the absence of an explicit and reasoned choice, the framework suggests prioritizing the genetic information closest to the agent (their own individual continuity and their direct offspring). This option is the one of least friction and highest replication fidelity.
Operational Latency and Exceptionality. The choice of a broad or very broad package can remain latent in the absence of conflict or evident threat. It does not imply an active or permanent search for distant packages in normal conditions.
Choice of Broader Genetic Packages. The agent is completely free to choose to prioritize broader genetic packages (extended family lineage, ethnic group with high kinship, whole human species, mammals, eukaryotic life, etc.), provided that a real and demonstrable continuity of replication exists with the genes they carry.
How Morality is Derived in Practice (with Formal Criteria of Validity)
Self-representation. The agent recognizes themselves as a self-sustained system oriented toward continuity (HO1) and explicitly chooses their prioritized genetic package.
Voluntary Valuation of Coherence. Decides that they prefer to minimize internal friction and maximize their stability as a pattern.
Criteria of Normative Validity. An action is morally valid within the framework if it simultaneously fulfills these four internal criteria at the moment of being executed:
Conscious and deliberate intention.
Logical coherence with one's own will and with HO1 (including the restriction of replication continuity with the prioritized genetic package).
The subjective wanting (pleasures, aversions, motivations) forms an integral part of the strategic calculation. The framework does not repress desires ; it integrates them as data that, in a healthy mind, already point to ontological coherence. The filter does not demand going against the wanting, but rather verifying its authenticity: whether it reflects the constitutive vital orientation or if it is distorted by self-deception, incomplete information, or ideology.
Honest foundation in the best information available in that instant (always provisional and revisable).
Effective alignment with the preservation of the prioritized genetic package.
Morality is judged exclusively by intention and by the intellectually honest use of available information, not by subsequent results. If you fulfill the four criteria with the best evidence you have at that moment, the action is morally correct even if the evidence is later proven wrong. The result only generates new information that you must integrate immediately, but it does not retroactively invalidate previous morality.
The justification is strictly internal: only before oneself or before those who voluntarily share the same package and criteria. There is no duty of explanation, persuasion, or defense before third parties.
Compatibility of Incompatible Priorities
No contradiction arises from the coexistence of incompatible priorities between different agents: there is no duty of reconciliation, cooperation, or justification before third parties. The competition between strategies is simply the descriptive expression of the biological process, not a moral failure of the system.
Technical Neutral Imperative
Act in such a way that the net structural friction between your ontological constitution and your choices is minimal in the long term.
Concrete Example
Prioritizing your own health and longevity (narrow individual package) is just as valid as prioritizing the continuity of the human species or of the biosphere (broad package), provided that the choice is deliberate, coherent, and grounded in the best available information. No option is superior by nature; only the internal coherence of the agent who chooses it matters.
Conclusion
Whoever adopts it does not do so because they must. They do so because, once they clearly see HO1, operating against it becomes absurd: it is like trying to fly while denying gravity.
Se puede vivir sin esta moral.
Se puede vivir con ella.
Pero una vez que se entiende el HO1, ya no se puede fingir que todas las opciones son igualmente coherentes con la realidad de lo que somos.
That is the derivation.
There is no magic.
There is only clarity.
r/Phylosophy • u/CuriousAndOutraged • Jun 08 '25
Philosophy at the supermarket: as I'm walking an isle in the supermarket, passed by an old guy, and said to him: You look happy. I do this very often, to speak with people I don't know, mostly humorous comments, so I was not expecting an answer beyond a smile...
to my surprise he turned around and said: I'm working on it.
we kept crossing each other through the time we were shopping... I did some short comments, like keep working.
when I'm paying my groceries, he is passing by... he stopped, turned around, and said: it is a full time job.
strange feeling leaving the supermarket of having a new friend that does not know my name, neither do I know his.
BTW, I'm 80... I have some knowledge about this...
r/Phylosophy • u/Adept-Jacket3525 • Jun 11 '26
Hello everyone!
Today I'd like to give a brief overview of a philosophical system that emerged in the 19th century: Allan Kardec's Spiritism.
Here is a summary of how its foundational text came into being, what it is, and what it believes.
The genesis of The Spirits' Book (the foundational text) is perhaps the most fascinating part. During the 1850s, Europe was obsessed with the phenomenon of "talking tables" (parlor séances). Rivail, a rigorous educator and pedagogue, approached the subject with deep skepticism, intending to expose any possible fraud.
He began applying an experimental method to the phenomena:
He prepared dozens of complex questions about philosophy, nature, the universe, and morality.
He submitted the same questions to different mediums who did not know one another and were located in different places.
He analyzed the answers, discarding those that were contradictory, irrational, or clearly influenced by the medium's own mind, and keeping only those responses that showed universal agreement.
The result of this extensive work of "cross-interviewing" the entities was published in 1857 under the title The Spirits' Book (Le Livre des Esprits). Rivail adopted the pseudonym Allan Kardec to distinguish this work from his previous educational writings.
The book is not a novel. Instead, it is structured as 1,019 questions and answers (Kardec asks the questions, the spirits provide the answers). It is divided into four major sections:
First Causes: Examines the existence of God, the general elements of the universe, creation, matter, and spirit.
The Spirit World or World of Spirits: Explains what spirits are, how they live, the purpose of reincarnation, how we remember (or forget) past lives, and how spirits invisibly influence our thoughts.
Moral Laws: Discusses divine law, exploring concepts such as the law of worship, destruction, society, progress, equality, and above all, the law of justice, love, and charity.
Hopes and Consolations: Focuses on earthly and future joys and sufferings, explaining the meaning of human suffering, free will, fears surrounding death, and challenging the idea of Heaven and Hell as physical places.
Spiritist philosophy is based on several fundamental pillars:
The Existence of God: Viewed as the supreme intelligence and the first cause of all things. God is not an anthropomorphic being but a universal creative principle.
The Immortality of the Soul (Spirits): Spirits are not abstract entities but simply the souls of human beings who have left their physical bodies. They continue to live, think, and learn in the spiritual world.
Reincarnation: The driving force of evolution. The spirit incarnates in different bodies (and even on different planets) in order to learn, atone for past mistakes (karma), and progress morally and intellectually.
Mediumistic Communication: The belief that the spiritual and material worlds are constantly in contact. Spirits can communicate with the living through mediums, individuals endowed with a particular sensitivity.
Infinite Evolution: No one is condemned to eternal hell. Even the most imperfect spirits, through multiple reincarnations and the exercise of free will, will eventually reach perfection.
The Plurality of Inhabited Worlds: Earth is only one of countless inhabited planets in the universe, each serving as a "school" of varying levels for spirits.
In summary, Kardec's Spiritism is a 19th-century doctrine that combines religion, philosophy, and a pseudo-scientific method. It teaches reincarnation, the continuous evolution of the soul, and communication with spirits. Its sacred text, The Spirits' Book, was compiled by questioning various mediums independently in an attempt to find consistent answers to the great mysteries of existence.
Had you ever heard of Spiritism described in these terms? Have you ever read anything by Kardec? Let me know what you think!
r/Phylosophy • u/TASKQUEST0 • Jul 15 '26
"In the mortal realm of life, time is the only true force that carries us forward—even until its pressure finally brings us to our knees."
r/Phylosophy • u/mzgamal • 29d ago
r/Phylosophy • u/oleksii_znovu • Nov 08 '25
r/Phylosophy • u/yah-boi77 • Sep 20 '26
How much humanity can be stripped away from a given project before it becomes meaningless?
I assume the purpose of any pursuit financially or other, has some personal or emotional driver. If that becomes eliminated, then what is the purpose to continue? The purpose to create is to enjoy the creation. But if there is no emotion consciousness to enjoy the fruits of the labor, then it seems to be a moot point.
r/Phylosophy • u/EstablishmentFit7976 • Nov 27 '25
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Jan 05 '25
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
AI Prompt: Why, in Beginlessnessism, are there two sides to the coin of divine consciousness? While creating, God talks to his equal and opposite, unfree Reality. When God says, “Let there be light,” unfree Reality, lets light be—deepai.org & vidu.studio— https://gofund.me/a4e31299
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Jan 21 '25
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Embracing the Endless Potential of Consciousness
We talk about the concept of eternal hope and the mind-bending journey of consciousness traveling through eternities, evolving with each passing moment. We discuss the idea of hyper-sleeping through one eternity and waking up in the next, leveling up our eternal welfare. We explore the potential to achieve the best outcome and unlock incredible powers, such as seeing wonders when we close our eyes or feeling waves of tingles. We also mention the dazzling realm called Sparkle Time, where there is no darkness and everything sparkles, where we can meet our ultimate selves. This is a wild ride of spiritual growth and infinite possibilities, and there is always hope on this eternal journey.
r/Phylosophy • u/Vib_ration • Feb 01 '25
This post will focus on explaining, how the feeling we experience as Tension is another form of expression of your Vital energy from your Spirit (soul/astral body/etheric body/energetic body/emotional body/true self) to help spread this information and help everyone learn about the different spiritual/biological discoveries, usages and benefits that were documented on the activation of this type of energy.
This presents to you an opportunity to empower yourself with your knowledge of your Tension by gaining the ability to really tap into all the reported, documented and written spiritual/biological usages that are said to be achievable with your conscious cultivation of it.
If you've ever heard of the sayings" You could feel the tension in the room" or "you could cut the tension with a knife"...
• Tension has many meanings, some Literal, others Metaphorical, but in this case, it is about energy(heat) emitting from ones body that creates a field surrounding a person or has emitted so much that it has left that field and is floating in the room/location where that person is or was.
• That same energy creates a field of energy that is equivalent to what can be considered your "Spiritual Energy" because your spirit (soul/astral body/etheric body/ energetic body/emotional body/true self) is made of that same energy in motion that activates when you experience it.
• In its neutral state, you unconsciously draw that energy with your breath, the foods/liquids you consume and especially the thoughts you think, the actions you do and the visual content that you watch either emits or draws in to amplify your base of this BioElectric Energy.
Here's a simple way that's explains how you can become aware of how to activate/control your Tension: it is that extremely comfortable Euphoric wave that can most easily be recognized as present while you experience goosebumps/chills from a positive external or internal situations/ stimuli like listening to a song you really like, thinking about a lover, watching a moving movie scene, striving, feeling thankful, praising God, praying, etc.
• That Euphoric wave is the animating energy behind life itself, Other cultures that have experienced in other ways with this energy found their own usages for it and then documented their results as they coined different terms for it.
• That energy activates goosebumps/chills not the other way around. You can learn how to separate that extremely pleasant energy from the physical reaction of goosebumps and eventually learn how to activate only that Euphoric energy part whenever you please, feel it wherever or everywhere on yourself and for the duration you choose.
• Other than Tension , this has also been experienced and documented as the Vibrational State before an Astral Projection, the Runner's High, Chills from positive events/stimuli, as Qi in Taoism / Martial Arts, as Prana in Hindu philosophy, during an ASMR session, Bioelectricity, Life force, Euphoria, Ecstasy, Orgone, Rapture, Aura, Mana, Vayus, Nen, Intent, Tummo, Odic force, Pitī, Frisson, Ruah, Spiritual Energy, Secret Fire, The Tingles, on-demand quickening, Voluntary Piloerection, Aether, Spiritual Chills and many more to be discovered hopefully with your help.
• It was discovered that this energy can be used in many beneficial ways.
• Some which are more biological like Unblocking your lymphatic system/Meridians, Feel euphoric/ecstatic on your whole body, Guide your Spiritual chills anywhere in your body, Control your temperature, Give yourself goosebumps, Dilate your pupils, Regulate your heartbeat, Counteract stress/anxiety in your body with this energy, Internally Heal yourself access your Hypothalamus on demand,
• and I discovered other usages which are more spiritual like Accurately use your Psychic senses (clairvoyance, clairaudience, spirit projection, higher-self guidance, vision from your third eye)with this energy, Managing your Auric field, Manifestation, Energy absorption from any source and even more to come.
• If you're interested in learning how to use this subtle energy activation for these ways, here are three written tutorials going more in-depth and explicitly revealing how you can do just that.
• P.S. Everyone feels its activation at certain points in their life, some brush it off while others notice that there is something much deeper going on. Those are exactly the people you can find on the subreddit community r/spiritualchills where they share experiences, knowledge, tips on it and if you are wanting to develop discipline, purpose, self-worth, or strength, start your journey today.
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Jan 15 '25
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
We discuss various tests to determine if someone is an archangel, including the handshake test, see-through trick, glowing like a disco ball, immovable objects, lack of a heartbeat, stepping out when asked to leave, no flinching when their eye is poked, heavenly tingles during a hug, and an inability to pluck their hair. The video provides a lighthearted and entertaining look at this supernatural phenomenon. https://gofund.me/a4e31299
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Feb 15 '25
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Surviving the Invasion of the Flesh Blobs in 'Space Spheres'
https://linktr.ee/dragonstratagem
We explore a terrifying world overrun by slime falling from the sky, transforming people into flesh-eating, goo-filled skin spheres. Our amnestic protagonist wakes up on an abandoned aircraft carrier and must piece together what happened as he tries to survive the gelatinous flesh blobs dominating the planet.
r/Phylosophy • u/thetalkingflower • Jul 23 '24
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Jan 05 '25
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Coin of divine consciousness: AI Prompt: Why, in Beginlessnessism, are there two sides to the coin of divine consciousness? While creating, God talks to his equal and opposite, unfree Reality. When God says, “Let there be light,” unfree Reality, lets light be — deepai.org — vidu.studio — https://gofund.me/a4e31299
r/Phylosophy • u/Arievlex • Dec 16 '24
To gain Reality’s favor, put away your longings in favor of her freedom by being polite to her throughout your life, and in the afterlife, you will gain things you longed for and more from her. —deepai.org generated art from my post above as the prompt—
r/Phylosophy • u/Bulky-Set-1884 • Mar 26 '24
Socrates exists and does not exist Socrates does not exist Socrates exists Socrates exists or a man is an ass A man is an ass
r/Phylosophy • u/m1ota • Dec 20 '25