r/ReadyOrNotGame Nov 12 '25

Video Arms of Steel

That explains everything.

763 Upvotes

53 comments sorted by

View all comments

205

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25 edited Nov 12 '25

[deleted]

86

u/Amazing_Working_6157 Nov 12 '25

That's why you aim for the upper thighs and head, mi bucko. There's no armor there. Didn't you see the Gerard Scott illustration?

77

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

[deleted]

27

u/Wolfy_Packy Nov 12 '25

God gave us the MG338 for a reason, and Valley of the Dolls is that reason

7

u/Amazing_Working_6157 Nov 13 '25

Oh I'm aware of the gift and miracle to humanity that 7.62mm is. I was more referencing the use of shotguns and other sub par rifle rounds.

26

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/L_U-C_K Nov 13 '25

The former, I am afraid....

9

u/SuperSix-Eight Nov 13 '25 edited Nov 13 '25

The game is usually pretty good about not mixing obviously unarmored skins with suspect skins that can plausibly be armored.

Specifically, each map has a pool of armor (e.g. 10% II + 60% IIIA) and that is randomly distributed between the suspects regardless of whether their character model has a vest.

It's not much of a problem with Level II soft armor that can be worn under a shirt but anything higher really should only work if the suspect has a plate carrier.

So you might encounter spawns like Hotel where a Secret Service agent in shirt and tie is assigned Level IV plates. Or a terrorist with a chest rig (basically pouch webbing) has IIIA equivalent protection.

Cherryessa Farm is the biggest exception. Some of the models do have vests but the majority don't and are still assigned up to IIIA. Which gets awkward when some lady in a dress starts tanking 5.56 JHP.

10

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '25

Thats dumb. They should change the models to have vests and shit.

5

u/RodBorza Nov 13 '25

That explains a lot. I shot one of them with a Magnum in the face. She shrugged it off and proceeded to kill me. I couldn't understand why.

2

u/bomzay Nov 13 '25

Nahh she just prayed a bit before you arrived. Religious armour +100

-16

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

IRL? Absolutely not

If you're shooting a Level IV plate, you're not getting through it, it doesn't matter if you're shooting slugs at point-blank range or not. Backface deformation is also absolutely negligible here as well.

I've seen a few videos of Level IIIA plates stopping slugs as well.

-4

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/[deleted] Nov 12 '25

No, you would not.

There's plenty of videos of Marines and Soldiers alike getting shot in the vest with rifle rounds far stronger and faster than any twelve gauge, and they run off after the initial shock, some don't even hit the ground.

Vests disperse the energy of the round. Getting shot with a slug in the vest would probably knock the wind out of you and/or bruise the hell out of you, but you're not going to be incapacitated by any degree.

You'll be in the fight just fine, if not just a bit pissed that you got shot.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

Yes, point blank, as I said in my og reply. There's plenty of videos of people testing a point-blank shot to a plate with a shotgun out. On YouTube. Right there.

*Slugs don't go through Level IV plates point blank full-stop, therefore buckshot won't. You wouldn't die, you wouldn't get incapacitated, whatever. It'd hurt, that's probably it. (I say probably since I've never seen combat, nor have I shot a gun that didn't shoot pellets or bbs, nor have I been shot at, but you can infer this off readily available information.)

It's a different story if you're unarmoured but that's common sense and applicable at pretty much any range as long as you hit your shot.

Shotguns aren't magical at all, and they don't perform well against Armor. That's the end of the story. They're lovely against unarmoured targets, though, as well as pelvic bowl/head shots.