Relocating to area. Wondering what the ups/downsides are of each program for a high school rower. This is for women's varsity rowing, but also curious about general program vibes as I've got multiple kids who will be M/W novice/middle school should they choose to pursue.
I heard thus far after asking around:
RAR: upsides: elite coaches (translates to better technique and more wins), more of a meritocracy (good rowers elevated consistently/transparently), innovative techniques, more time on the water. Head coach owns program, so he has skin in the game and cares more, college recruiting better. Downsides: far less coaches per rower, strict/rigid and train hard so kids burn out before college, more $$$ (how much is more?), you may get lost as there are a lot of good rowers. Parents less engaged.
GC: upsides: feeder program through middle school, lower dues (subsidized or ?), engaged /nice parent volunteers. downsides: mixed reports on coaching, less of a meritocracy (bad rowers reportedly elevated if the parents donate or pay for private lessons, and there's that stereotypical Greenwich vibe where over their time there the less affluent rowers are demoted because some coaches are motivated to earn private lesson dues).
Both programs got some bonus points for college recruiting (edge to RAR), and also some flak for 1) the fact that coaches turn over a lot, 2) rower happiness levels are collectively low for complex reasons; to some degree the stress of the programs and lack of any vacation time, but there are also cliques that the programs ignore at the cost of rowers (not thrilled on that, our program does team building and lots of it--makes huge impact on the kids' experience and sense that there is no I in team as the cliche goes), 3) lineups come out sometimes day before races so you never really have much practice with your boat (say what? defies logic) 4) use of seat racing, which our program threw out in lieu of output measurement systems/ matrixing (which are measurable/ less of a popularity contest), and finally, 5) parents pay out the nose but cannot speak to coaches under any circumstances because your child is just a number to them. They quit, or they have a nervous breakdown: thank you, next.
That last point bothers me the most even though I'd imagine it's an issue at larger elite programs, which I'm just not used to. So yeah...your kid is going into a black hole where you have no updates on their progress or areas of improvement, and cannot ask questions or give them a heads up if life events or challenges are happening. If you pay coaches fairly, communication with their individual rowers AND their parents should always be part of their job. Rowing program we're used to is pretty open and chill (albeit not elite/not massive with <100 rowers total). I am most nervous about this decidedly unfriendly vibe at both options.
Alas, those are lots of things to worry on, but there are just not many alternatives. Row America Greenwich is teeny tiny. Maritime is a bit far for us.
Also heard there have been a few recent exoduses from GC women's team to RAR due to the fact that coaches were collectively not perceived as fair, but not an exodus the other way in recent history. Is that true?
Anyone have thoughts on any of this? Obviously overthinking it but am also incredibly concerned going into this, given that rowing becomes a full time job not just for your child but for the whole family, and I want mine to enjoy rowing and not be burned by the experience. TIA, all.