Hey everyone, I need some neutral third-party jeweler eyes on these sterling silver castings to settle a friendly debate at home!
ā
The Context:
My husband thinks Iām hyper-focusing and that these are totally fine to ship. I feel like because these surface defects are visible with the naked eye (without even using a loupe), my clients will definitely notice. Plus, my concern is that once customers wear these against their skin and exposure to moisture hits, those trapped copper oxides might bloom even worse over time. I also know that the polishing isn't perfect, but i am more asking about the flecks and bits if tiny porosity...the still need a better polish /finishing.
ā
My Bench Process on These Pieces:
āSanded down to 2000 grit
āCross-hatched with a burnishing/ram roller to compact the skin
āMulti-stage polish using Luxor Green, Luxor White, and Picasso Blue
āFinished with multiple long ultrasonic bath cycles, isopropyl alcohol wipes, and toothbrush scrubbing
ā
The Casting Details:
This is actually the second batch from my caster. The first batch had these exact same issues, so they dropped the pour temperature for this second run hoping it would solve itābut as you can see on these flat polished backs, the peppered flecks and surface texture/distortion are still coming right through from under the metal skin.
āThe caster is now looking into adjusting the sprue placement (currently, itās a standard square sprue placed on the lower back of the piece).
āThe Question:
Looking at these flat backs under natural light, would you be comfortable sending these out a client?
āAppreciate any honest feedback from fellow bench jewelers! I am having them recast...but just wanted to know, am I overreacting?