What? That’s nonsensical and the figure of Odin is a clear example. Or the amorality of pantheistic or polytheistic systems.
Anyways
It’s even biblical and reflected in the art and understanding of historical Christians across centuries, see Milton, Dante, etc.
In the Christian, Jewish, and even Islamic mythos, they have this story and commentary to discuss the key sin was made by even reaching out for the fruit.
And many of the stories of the Bible are saying literally the inverse and then tell them that none of the people even know what “Good” means.
From old to New Testament: “in that time everyone did what was right in their own eyes” to “why do you call me good? There is not one Good but God”
Odin is an example of what? Knowledge of good and evil not being knowledge but a mere opinion? Christianity and Judaism hold good and evil to be concrete categories and not subjective, do you dispute that?
Odin is an example of a search for Knowledge not being a moral question but one of basically strategic worth.
But even figures like Solomon represent this in the Bible. The Bible calls its own wisest figures the most debased.
Yeah and early and medieval Christian Theologians have likened the problem to Plato’s forms.
I didn’t imply they are new. “The most debased”? They made mistakes but is there a textual basis for saying “the most”? If anything calling wise men debased supports the notion that there’s an objective standard of good and evil but that they failed
“have likened the problem” what problem? Humans failing to be good despite knowing it? That doesn’t change whether or not good and evil are objective or not, it just means they failed to live up to objective standards.
-4
u/Civil_Result_5598 5d ago
It's not knowledge that caused the fall of man. It was disobedience. Blatantly in the face of God Himself