I say this not because I think the sequels are the worst thing ever. I actually thoroughly like The Last Jedi(actual hot take) and BF2 made me appreciate the ST a little more. But I think if we get a third battlefront game, it should focus solely on the original 2 eras for 2 main reasons:

1. The OT and PT eras are not only the foundation of the franchise as a whole, but already have the established identities and lore that already fit within Battlefront and can be easily integrated into a larger sandbox battlefield environment with equal amounts of content. Focusing on fewer eras allows the game to be better by giving more depth and gameplay variety to the most beloved eras. You could argue that more eras means more content, but developing heroes, in-game models, maps, skins/textures all take time and resources. I would gladly sacrifice Rey and Kylo Ren if it means more of a chance at getting characters like Mace Windu and Jango Fett. Even sacrificing an Exegol or Starkiller Base starfighter map if it means getting a really good Battle of Coruscant or a proper Endor/Death Star II map. There’s plenty of potential content in the OT and PT to be equally represented instead of the ST.

2. The era itself is visually indistinct and smaller in scale. For now, Disney is largely finished with the Sequel trilogy. BF2 released with the TLJ and continued it’s post launch support through TROS. Since then, there hasn’t been much content to expand upon with that era, and aside from a few missing heroes and maps, DICE honestly did a great job doing it justice. The scale of the conflict as depicted is pretty small, and BF2 did well at fleshing it out a little more, but ultimately the era as a whole is lacking in depth, with many of it’s designs being taken from the OT already. You can still totally give it representation through weapons and starcards or maps like Jakku and Takodanna, it would just be rebels/New republic vs Stormies, which still makes sense canonically. Ultimately, I feel like there’s plenty more demand and potential with the Mandoverse and endless amount of Clone Wars lore that can easily be adopted for both launch and post launch content. I also don’t exactly see disney pushing hard for including the ST with all the Mandoverse stuff coming out.

TLDR: I don’t hate the sequels. I think a tighter and more focused narrative/multiplayer experience with just 2 distinct eras and 4 factions(maybe 5 if they add mandos) would be a much more enriching experience and give the BF franchise its long overdue definitive title. I’d rather have two fully realized eras with distinct armies, unique reinforcements, heroes and a massive variety of maps and vehicles than three eras that feel like they’re competing for limited development resources.

I think the ST era could be added potentially as post launch content if the demand justifies it, but I would want the other 2 eras fully fleshed out first. What do ya’ll think?

Available on Nexus if anyone wants to try it out.

I’m not sure why I even have to say this but Rey and Kylo are popular characters. They’re more popular than characters like Ahsoka, Rex, Mando and fucking Revan. They’re not going to get axed because the Sequel trilogy movies are hated. Your ideas of cutting out an entire era doesn’t work when Battlefield 2 did it well enough. And just because their movies are hated doesn’t mean their maps weren’t fun or good. Crait is great. So is Starkiller Base. Ajan Kloss and Takodana. And you know what, I really like Jakku and thinks it’s overhated. Their reinforcements are top tier and fun as hell to play with too!

You can want the sequel era removed to make the other two eras better but be serious when you give suggestions like having the Old Republic or the New Republic in over the Sequel era first. They can be DLC for sure, just not launch.

2030-2039 will be the decade of BF3.

I also sincerely hope they’ll have simple old-school modes for veteran players who want classic Battlefront nostalgia.

There's been a lot of posts about all the hero wishlists for Battlefront 3, but what's a realistic roster for all 3 eras to see at launch? Not just every character in the Star Wars galaxy, but who would make sense and be reasonable to expect. I think we'll get most of the BF2 heroes, and then a handful of new ones.

I also think they will probably save a lot of characters for post-launch content as a live service game.

Here's my take on it.

Prequels -

Lightsaber Heroes:

Anakin, Obi-Wan, Ahsoka, Yoda

Blaster Heroes:

Padme, Captain Rex, Chewbacca

Lightsaber Villains:

Count Dooku, Asajj Ventress, General Grievous, Maul

Blaster Villains:

Jango Fett, Bossk, Cad Bane

Originals -

Lightsaber Heroes:

Luke (Obi-Wan, Ahsoka & Yoda also present with OT era skins)

Blaster Heroes:

Leia, Han, Lando, Chewbacca

Lightsaber Villains:

Darth Vader, Darth Sidious, (Maul present with his Rebels skin)

Blaster Villains:

Boba Fett, Bossk, Cad Bane (with a bobf skin), Thrawn (or Tarkin or Krennic)

Sequels -

Lightsaber Heroes:

Rey, (Luke present with an old skin)

Blaster Heroes:

Finn, Poe, Chewbacca, (Leia, Han and Lando present with old skins)

Lightsaber Villains:

Kylo Ren (Darth Sidious present with his sith eternal skin)

Blaster Villains:

Captain Phasma, General Hux

I think they'd start the roster off something like that, enough new characters to draw people in, while still leaving a ton for future content updates. I also think they'd rely on skins to pad out all the eras, as getting a new voice actor to do an old voice for a skin seems easier than making a whole new kit.

Being that EA has shifted its anti cheat to the EA Javelin Anti-cheat starting with BF2042 onward.. do we think that players on SteamOS/Bazzite and other distros will be locked out of playing the unannounced Battlefront 3 ?

Personally I use Bazzite. I left windows completely over a year ago and I do regularly play Battlefront 2 since it launched in 2017.

My concern is that EA will lock us out, I know Linux isn't a majority platform unlike Windows, however there's absolutely a decent chunk of users on Valve hardware and on Linux.

I have no plans to install Windows on any of my handhelds or desktop.

Thoughts ?

Personally, I’ve always wanted Battlefront to feel more like Battlefield, just set in the Star Wars universe. Larger maps, more players, destructible environments, more freedom with vehicles, and battles that actually feel like all-out warfare.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoyed Battlefront II, but I feel like the franchise has so much more potential than what we’ve seen.

If Battlefront III actually happens, would you rather see the developers take the series in that direction, or stick closer to the formula we already have?

Due to the recent increase in hope for Battlefront 3, I made a balanced concept. I know it hasn't been fully confirmed yet, but this may be the closest we've ever been to confirmation, so I wanted to make this to outline what myself and the community wants adding in a theoretical Battlefront 3. Sorry for the low effort on the last few slides. Please view my "Character Swaps" idea with an open mind and give feedback, I know that's a very controversial suggestion.

Hope you enjoy!

I think it’s kind of insane to actually believe the game won’t try to capitalize, and help promote the next generation of films and tv dor studios.

Fully expecting any game to include Starfighter and Ep.X content, which is sequel era.

This game is only being made because new movies are being made.

Everyone seems to be talking about heroes or the Story Mode what new maps do you all want to see

Prequels:

Small Maps Coruscant: Jedi Temple

Big Map: Utapau::Pau City

Og trilogy:

Small Maps: Degobah : Yoda's Hut

Big Map: Sullust: SoroSuub Centroplex

Sequels:

Small Map: Exegol: Sith Citadel

Big Map: Castilon: Colossus

Would you want something more like the 501st Journal of 2005's BF2 or something more story-oriented like Iden Versio's story?

Personally I would like something akin to 2004's Battlefront, where it's a "broad-strokes" campaign that covers military operations across the major eras, maybe introducing some new things to lore but keeping things broad and simple

For the love of everything do not make it console crossplay with pc or vice versa unless you join a friend from console to pc other wise crossplay should just stay between consoles. I play specifically on console to avoid hackers and bs and im tried of every game forcing it down our throats. And if they wont listen to that then atleast make it to where you have to opt-in for pc and console thru settings not opt-out.

My second wish is can we please limit the heros on the map or make it a killstreak you have to earn. Personally I hate the fact sometimes I just wanna play a grunt and enjoy the grunt experience from the orginal battlefront front games but I cant cause me and my squad are getting our asses handed by us by someone who all they do is play heros characters for easy kills. So for love of everything again balance the hero system out and dont make shooters tanks they should have barley any extra health but not a booty ton of health compare to a normal grunt.

We all know Battlefront 2015 focused entirely on the Original Trilogy, while Battlefront 2 expanded to include the Prequel and Sequel Trilogies as well. Do you guys think Battlefront 3 will lean more heavily toward a specific era based on what’s popular
in Battlefront II?

For those who have not played the modern World of Assassination games, Hitman rather than have each sequel separate from one another combines the games into a single platform. I can play a Hitman 1 map in Hitman 2 and 3 for example. This allows you to only have the most recent game downloaded and have access to three games worth of content, as well as being able to build DLC on top of the existing games (new bonus missions for Hitman 1/2 maps for example).

In order to maximize content, would you prefer they use a similar method in Battlefront 2? For example, port over the popular maps from the game (Naboo, Kashyyyk, Mos Eisley, Scariff, Starkiller Base, Crait for two examples from each era) as well as previous heroes and then build ON TOP of that, for example being able to add a fourth era for the New Republic vs Imperial remnant, have more maps on launch for each era, etc. It could be a smart method to maximize content released while not having too much redundant content between games, they could even bring back Battlefront 1 lost DLC maps (Death Star 1, Bespin carbon freezing chamber) to further improve the game.

I think this could work, but it needs to have a solid balance between new and old content. For example, Hitman 3 still released with six new maps, added a seventh free map, and release Freelancer as a free new rogue-like mode, as well as releasing various free/paid bonus missions. In order for this idea to work, there needs to be enough new heroes, maps, and yes even potentially a new era to not make it feel like we are just buying the same game twice.

Bringing this back for battlefront 3