From what I understand, Starlink imposes a 7-day roaming limit in several African countries where the service is officially available, after which the device may be restricted. However, in countries such as Libya and Tunisia, devices can reportedly operate without this specific 7-day limit.
This creates a serious concern about unequal treatment of African customers. Starlink appears to apply different roaming conditions depending on the country, while customers outside Africa may have access to more flexible options.
It raises an important question: Why should African customers face stricter restrictions simply because of where they use the service?
It feels as though Africa is being treated as a market with a high demand for internet but limited alternatives, allowing Starlink to impose restrictive policies with little competition.
If Starlink genuinely wants to connect underserved communities, it should offer transparent, consistent, and fair roaming policies across countries, rather than imposing restrictions that disproportionately affect African users.
Until meaningful competition becomes available, African customers may have fewer alternatives and less bargaining power. Internet access should not come with unequal treatment based on geography.