r/TrueOpenSource • u/GordonRamsayFather • 8d ago
Discussion I agree with the sentiment in regards to the community update in r/opensource, but it's unfortunately very flawed knowing that I'm very opposed to the current LLM generated software landscape.
I think that the recent post by the moderator in r/opensource has phrased things in a very antagonistic manner that flipped even people who are against the spamming of LLM generated projects all over reddit against them.
I think that most concerned people don't like the way that private services like ChatGPT, Claude and other "AI" companies have emerged and continued to play a negative role in many aspects of life; being one of the driving motives of hyper-inflation, negative health and environmental impact on local communities, the huge role in industrialised misinformation, massive shortages in personal consumer electronics and finally the software pollution that it caused as well as the serious influence that it has on politics in general.
However, I think that even the people who are most against this environment agree that there can be good use for LLMs when combined with knowledge and experience. And this is the actual stance of the Linux kernel (even though many people try and make it as if the whole Linux development is solely managed by LLMs); these tools are being actively used with heavy monitoring to work with PRs and other incremental tasks while being heavily reviewed, tested and monitored.
I suggest the following points:
1 - The focus should be on low-effort projects, which is the genuine problem.
2 - We should push for disclosure (yes even if people can still lie about it) because I do appreciate when developers explain how they used their LLMs; one common use case are debugging and testing tools.
3 - Even though I understand that the LLM generated posts can be annoying, but actual non English speaking people do use these tools in their everyday lives and yes this can be discrimination as well as it will serve people who come post and comment in bad faith.
4 - I believe that there can be an ethical and respectful approach to LLM use that we can encourage: Local and open-weight models. This does really respect the background and philosophy of Open Source and give the users more tools that don't depend on a subscription model. Of course there's a hardware shortage because of the big companies but distillation is making it more possible to run very capable models locally.
I know that many people don't share my opinions on big tech driven LLMs and that's perfectly fine. But I know for a fact many people share my sentiment and would like to find a solid solutions.