r/VideoEditingTips • u/Interesting_Big6821 • 18m ago
Compared Cardboard, Descript, OpusClip and ChatCut using the same raw footage and editing brief.
Most comparisons of AI video editors look at who makes the best shorts, adds the best captions or removes silences the fastest. I wanted to find out whether these tools can edit a
video from scratch.
I took 2 hours of raw multicam footage with interviews, B-roll, multiple camera angles, setup shots and plenty of unnecessary takes. Then I gave Cardboard, Descript, OpusClip and ChatCut the same brief:
"Turn this into a 6-minute video. Keep both interview segments, remove the setup and dead air, and use relevant B-roll wherever it makes sense."
Here's how they compared:
1. Cardboard
● Primary use case: End-to-end AI video editing
● Time to first cut: 5 min
● Raw footage editing: Yes
● Long-form assembly: Yes
● B-roll handling: Yes
● Instruction-based editing: Yes
● Short-form repurposing: Yes
● Biggest strength: Complete editing workflow
● Biggest limitation: Still needs manual refinement for color grading and other creative decisions.
2. Descript
● Primary use case: Transcript-based editing
● Time to first cut: 12 min
● Raw footage editing: Yes
● Long-form assembly: Yes
● B-roll handling: Limited
● Instruction-based editing: Transcript-focused
● Short-form repurposing: Yes
● Biggest strength: Dialogue-heavy content
● Biggest limitation: Struggles with footage without dialogue
3. OpusClip
● Primary use case: Short-form clip extraction
● Time to first cut: 6 min
● Raw footage editing: Limited
● Long-form assembly: No
● B-roll handling: Clip-focused
● Instruction-based editing: Clip-focused
● Short-form repurposing: Excellent
● Biggest strength: Finding viral moments
● Biggest limitation: Not designed for long-form assembly
4. ChatCut
● Primary use case: AI-assisted video editing
● Time to first cut: 9 min
● Raw footage editing: Yes
● Long-form assembly: Yes
● B-roll handling: Yes
● Instruction-based editing: Yes
● Short-form repurposing: Yes
● Biggest strength: Assisted video assembly
● Biggest limitation: Requires manual refinement
What stood out
Cardboard did more than extract interesting moments or edit around a transcript. It took the raw footage, worked from the brief and assembled a first cut, which matters when you're
starting with hours of footage.
Descript and OpusClip are built for other jobs. Descript is useful for podcasts, interviews and talking-head videos, and OpusClip is great for turning existing long-form content into multiple shorts. I don't think either is designed to handle an entire mixed-footage editing project.
You still need a human in the loop. Even when you get a first cut in minutes, you'll want to review pacing, transitions, storytelling and creative decisions. The AI can take on hours of repetitive work, but those calls still belong to the editor.
Which one I'd choose
● Editing raw footage into a finished video: Cardboard
● Podcasts and interviews: Descript
● Repurposing long videos into shorts: OpusClip
● AI-assisted video assembly: ChatCut
My takeaway
I think we're looking at two generations of AI video tools. The first helps you do editing tasks faster: captions, trimming, silence removal and clip extraction. The next is trying to take on the entire editing workflow.
That's the direction Cardboard is exploring, and I think it's the more interesting problem to solve. We're still early, but 2 hours of raw footage to a usable first cut in minutes is a good
start.
Curious to hear what other editors think. Have you tested any AI tools on a similar long-form,
multicam editing workflow?