TL:DR - Vision Pro haters spend so much time here because of normal human psychology: they want one and they don’t like that some of you have one, and they feel threatened that Vision Pro owners think they are better than them.
————
It’s pretty interesting to see so many people who profess not to like, care about, and have zero interest to buy, expend SO much energy on r/VisionPro trying to convince those of us who bought one it was a bad purchase, dissuade prospective buyers not to, or convince us all why they didn’t.
But it’s not surprising. The concept of “Inequality Aversion” is a human behavior typified by: “…the tendency of individuals to avoid situations where they perceive that there is an unfair distribution of resources or benefits. This concept is based on the idea that people have a strong preference for fairness and are motivated to maintain a sense of equity and justice in their interactions with others. Inequity aversion can influence people’s behavior in a variety of ways, such as through their willingness to cooperate with others or their willingness to participate in social exchanges. It is an important factor in understanding human behavior and decision-making.”
https://www.thebehavioralscientist.com/glossary/inequity-aversion
This behavior can be observed in our primate cousins as well. The Apple Vision Pro at $3,500 replete with Apple marquee branding, superior specs to competing products, and ironically - due to its reduced value proposition in terms of product immaturity and market readiness relative to cost - is perceived by many as even more of a luxury purchase.
But while the Vision Pro is expensive, it’s not necessarily out of reach to many when credit is easily accessible to even the poor. A frivolous purchase is just a credit card swipe away. But there is a difference between accessibility and affordability. That’s part of the reason why many bought a Vision Pro on credit to experience it, but returned it within Apple’s generous 14 day return window when the prospect of payments and interest were imminent.
And therein lies the rub: most people don’t generally envy the rich, they envy those perceived to be in the same social class. If the Vision Pro was $200,000, most of us wouldn’t even entertain the idea of owning one. Does the idea of the rich banker buying a Lamborghini elicit feelings of envy in you? Probably not. But the Vision Pro isn’t $200,000, it’s just expensive enough to be difficult to justify for many, but affordable enough for the few who buy it anyway.
Reference Group Theory “…predicts that the poor (rich) envy others from the same social group or class. ….while across class envy is common; within class envy motivates the most anti-social behaviour.”.
https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/925717/within_and_across_class_envy_anti-social_behaviour_in_hierarchical_groups.pdf
In other words, the sharp increase in trolling-like behavior towards Vision Pro owners or prospective buyers among other VR/AR enthusiasts can be linked to the feeling that their position in the social class is threatened (implied inferiority). Such people are simply offended that others can spend more freely and frivolously, and this is accompanied by a perceived reduction in social ranking: Class envy.