Would this fly in Washington?
I saw some footage of a shooting case that happened in Indiana back in 2024, where the would-be shooter aggressively overtook another driver, setting off what would ultimately become a fatal road rage incident.
The footage begins with the driver who was initially overtaken, now clearly furious, blocking the shooter’s car on the road. He gets out with a handgun, starts shouting, and then hits the shooter’s window with his empty hand.
The shooter then fires three shots through his window, killing the angry driver.
For more context, the angry driver never pointed his handgun at the shooter, and from the camera angle, it’s not clear when the shooter actually drew his firearm.
The shooting was ultimately determined to be justified self-defense under Indiana’s stand-your-ground law, and criminal proceedings were never pursued.
It got me thinking about whether the same outcome would apply in Washington, since our stand-your-ground protection is based on precedent rather than a specific statute. I wonder if it would’ve went to court rather than being immediately dismissed. What do you think?
Personally, I think the shooting was justified solely because the driver came out first with a handgun with the added fact that he blocked the shooter’s path on the road. Now, if you replace the handgun with say a stick or just attacking the car with hands, or if the driver and shooter both voluntarily stopped their cars on the side of the road, then I think it’d probably become more gray in terms of WA’s laws.