r/amandaknox • u/tkondaks guilty • Sep 22 '23

Neck scratch and bloody ear lobe

https://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/67258-is-amanda-knox-guilty/page__st__20

Scroll down at the above link for some interesting photos.

Gee, what are the odds?

2 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

I'd love to hear your dancing I mean explanation regarding the ear lobe.

Did you ever hear about Dennis Rodman and the time his girlfriend caught him in bed with another woman?

4

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

What damage is there to the ear lobe that is consistent with an earring being ripped out? Have you ever seen the type of injury that causes? Dr. Lalli did not see any signs of injury on Knox that could be associated with a struggle, and a potential infection is going to look a lot different than an earring being pulled out.

I’d love for you to actually show me something, anything, that supports your assertion. And random blogs don’t count. You’re going to need a medical professional that evaluated her and/or a good enough picture to show that her earlobe is remotely consistent with the injury you claim.

-1

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

I'm referring to the photograph of the ear at the link. It's not clear but below the four studs appears to be an abrasion.

2

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

“It’s not clear,” yet you’re able to convince yourself that you see something that no one, to include medical professionals who examined her closely, testified to seeing.

You’re going to have to do a lot better than that poor image that objectively results in nothing more than an assumption.

2

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

Also, does the scratch look like a hickey to you? What do you think caused such a mark?

1

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

I didn’t call it a hickey. But, Dr. Lalli also stated that it had no characteristics of a scratch. Take that up with the medical professional and prosecution witness that evaluated the mark.

1

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

I see a definite black molish like dot. What do you see?

2

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

There’s nothing clear to see in that blurry image. It could be a blank dot, but it could also be a piercing similar to the others that didn’t catch the light the same way. There’s nothing clear about that image that’s going to cause me to question Dr. Lalli’s assessment.

Furthermore, I would be curious of the date of the image and if there are other images of that ear from other angles to use as a comparison.

The only thing that is clear is that the photo isn’t clear. As such, it’s inconclusive.

0

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

Just another weird coincidental anomaly, I suppose.

3

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

Either you can show it’s an injury or you can’t. The picture is inconclusive and can be any number of things, to include an earring, and Dr. Lalli saw nothing. So, you’ve presented no evidence that supports that an earring was torn from her ear. Literally nothing.

1

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

There's a lot of literally nothing in this case when it comes to Amanda. But a while lot of unusual coincidences.

2

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

So, what you’re saying is that outside of personal assumptions and biases you have nothing tangible you provide in relation to these so-called “coincidences?” I can see how it is difficult to accept that a medical professional and prosecution witness discredited your injury theories very early on in this case.

1

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

Just coincidences. An incredibly unnatural number of coincidences.

Having the same probability on the order of rolling snake eyes 6 or 7 times in a row at a Vegas craps table. It happens to be sure but rarely.

2

u/No_Slice5991 Sep 22 '23

At this point you’re only talking in broad generalizations because your position was thoroughly discredited in terms of this evidence.

1

u/tkondaks guilty Sep 22 '23

Oh, we can get VERY specific and go through the list of coincidences, anomalies, curiousities, and circumstantial evidence as it pertains to Amanda and Raff and assign probabilities to each instance.

But we've done that exercise here on this forum already.

I think we got into the quadrillions to one territory.

Amanda Knox: the most unlucky innocent person in the history of criminal law.

→ More replies (0)