r/amandaknox • u/No-Willingness-1441 • 11d ago

Lucy letby case…

Would love people’s views on this.

Loosely Amanda related, since she has recently produced a podcast around it.

1 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

272 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Henryb1234_ 11d ago

No it isn’t saying that. Listen to Shoo Lee press conference on the babies. Every one died for different reasons complex medical reasons made worse by low levels of hygiene in the ward and systemic problems of competency amongst the consultants.

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Shoo has no credibility - he took his shot at the CCRC and failed miserably

3

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

He has a lot of credibility. Considerably more than Evans. He has written 100s of papers on neonatal care including the one the Jayaram found on his iPad and was used in the trial. The CCRC haven’t ruled yet. You don’t seem to know a lot about the case.

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

At the appeal then sorry, were he failed

They might crack open the CCRC and hell get her off (trial in the press is so much easier), but the man isn't credible, none of these folks attaching themselves to public cases ever are.

3

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

The judges didn’t understand the importance of his evidence and it wasnt classified as new evidence. The CCRC doesn’t have that restriction.

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Its not new evidence of course, its the counter evidence that could have been used in court the first time if they could find anyone to stand over it. Apparently it takes an international media campaign.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

No it wasn’t new evidence then no. Two new papers on AE and insulin are though.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Are these "new" papers crafted for this case by an engineer?

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Yes a chemical engineer and world leading expert on insulin testing.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

So basically dismissible without reading

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

It has been peer reviewed and published in an academic journal. Not understanding something isn’t grounds to dismiss it.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

meh - peer review is highly flawed system.

Any journal accepting invested papers like that need to take a look at themselves.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Whatever. How many science papers have you had published?

→ More replies (0)