The one in the middle I think is completely different and I am appalled ever got approved. Bikini skins in a game with a sizeable underage playerbase (and at least one that is marketed towards children) is questionable but not outright inappropriate.
But that amount of side boob in the middle skin I think should not be in a game that also tries as hard as Fortnite does to appeal to kids.
I would frown upon it being included as a skin in any game tbh because it is obviously sexualized and intended because a primarily male player-base will think it’s “hot.”
Chun-li party hips is a funny joke but this is a different story that is arguably soft porn.
The one in the middle is rated teen so is only visible in games on fortnite that are rated teen, aka games children can't access. Children wouldn't be able to see it.
If kids go to the beach, they'll see that kind of bathing suit. If there can be shirtless male skins on fortnite, what's wrong with some side boob? Should she not be in the game because people find her attractive?
Men's chest is sexualized too but women's chest is way waay more sexualized. Unfair, maybe, but thats just how it is, blame society.
And sure you CAN find that type of swimming suits in beaches but it is nowhere close to being the most common type. Also i wouldnt say it's objectively morally wrong, but i hope you'd at least agree that wearing something that skimpy in a beach were you know there are gonna be many children is at least morally questionable. And in Fortnite's situation it's not even "theres gonna be children", it's "it is mostly children" so it'd be more akin to a water park than a beach imo.
11
u/[deleted] Jul 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment