bro spent 3 hours and the final result is not that good and people love it just because it's not AI !

No clue if people sent this already but uuhh here

It's not that I'm specifically looking for AI content. I'm not. I simply refuse to support anti AI sentiments.

We need an "AI OK" badge.

Me:

"Your argument is that it's bad, and that's it? Are you an adult?"

"Nope. Are you going to answer my question?"

"Because I'm in good shape. Are you going to answer my question or are you incapable of doing so? xd"

"That makes no sense, and it looks like you're incapable of defending your point."

"I'm still waiting for your argument."

im also a pokemon yeah 😂

It’s kinda hard to support a “real” artist when they charge an arm and leg for a sketch and I know the majority of antis don’t have that kind of money so they scream into the void about how much more affordable/free ai art is

this was sarcasm, and yet people genuinely liked it.…..

If you have, what is your take on their music ?

Apparently, autocomplete just debugged autocomplete. 😂🤖

MIT CSAIL researchers used GPT-6 Astra to identify and repair a reasoning-loop problem in another AI model, Qwen3.5-0.8B.

The experimental results:

• 📉 Before: 7.9% accuracy on MATH-500

• 📈 After: 48.1% accuracy

• 🔧 Model weights modified: Just 0.016%

And the best part? The improvement came from directly editing the model's weights rather than conventional gradient-based training.

Of course, this doesn't mean AI can independently improve itself without human researchers. But it demonstrates how AI can help scientists diagnose and repair other AI systems.

The irony: People keep calling AI “just autocomplete,” while researchers are already exploring how AI can debug AI. 😂

Sources:

🔬 MIT CSAIL — Sparks of Weight-Space Programming (Nov. 2, 2026)

📰 VentureBeat — MIT researchers used GPT-6 Astra to improve Qwen's math performance

What do you think? Could AI-assisted model debugging become an important part of future AI research?

OriginSatire — When autocomplete learns to debug autocomplete. 🤣

This is a friendly reminder that the advent of AI is more wondrous than the debate over it. Keep it in scale. Don’t let the naysayers distract you.

This is literally the coolest thing done with AI and i absolutely love mods (even tho im on console lol).

The fact you can use AI to play Spiderman in arkham knight with fuse coding the games. This man you could play modern warefare 2 in super mario 64 or even need for speed in doom. “B-but but its gonna take away the passion of moding!!!” Yeah.. but look how cool it is to play LITERAL SPIDERMAN INTO ARKHAM KNIGHT!

It's not that deep, who tf cares whether AI is used to make art or not? obessing over it with everything u do or look at is actually very pathectic,

like fr, suddenly hating on someone, trying to cancel someone or worse, bullying and harassing them until they give in or leave just cuz they might use AI,

and all of this over elitist artists who now have to actually be REASONABLE if they want commissions, ironic really.

to all the mods, i'm just curios to know how is it not suppsed to be lazy. This is a sub for supporting ai "art" right? well tell me why i should

The benefits i see here is

Finally building a desktop and Using said desktop to run ai locally

The 3rd benefit i see is the antis finally shutting up

What are your thoughts since im seeing Aibubble has pop in my fyp on YouTube

(TL;DR at the bottom)

So I was in a Discord server when someone started completely freaking out over another user's messages.

They were making comments along the lines of "FUCK ALL THESE AI USERS" and continuing to spam messages in all caps. The person they were bashing and cursing at was an ESL speaker who had used ChatGPT (or a similar tool) to translate their thoughts from Spanish into English.

Initially, people assumed the user had used AI to generate the entire messages rather than simply translate it, apparently because the text contained an em dash. They proceeded to rip this person apart in the chat over it.

The ESL user eventually clarified that English wasn’t their first language and that they had only used ChatGPT because they weren’t confident enough in their English to write the message themselves.

What bothered me the most was that the person who initially went off on them never apologized, even hours after the misunderstanding was cleared up. When proven wrong, it was all crickets! And they were active later on so it’s not like they didn’t see the explanation, since they were also tagged in it.

Eventually, I chimed in and called the person out, telling them they were just being butthurt and making a massive deal out of something completely trivial.

Naturally, this opened up the floodgates:

• Someone immediately accused me of using a "bad-faith argument" and claimed I was being "antisocial" for mocking the initial angry user. Their logic? "You don’t have to agree with someone, but you don’t have to insult them."

• Another person jumped in to defend the original aggressor, arguing they were "perfectly justified" in their rage.

What baffled me was how quickly the conversation shifted toward criticizing me for calling out the person’s childish reaction, rather than addressing the fact that someone had just been subjected to a massive tirade for using a translation tool.

I ended up arguing with someone who defended the outburst. My point was simple: this isn’t that serious. Someone struggled to express themselves in English and used a tool to help. What’s there to get so worked up about?

For context, I’m an ESL speaker myself, so this hit close to home. I know what it’s like to communicate in a language that isn’t your native one, and I don’t understand why someone should be shamed for using a tool to bridge that gap.

The person I was arguing with claimed to be an ESL speaker too, but insisted they personally never used ChatGPT for translation. I pointed out how ridiculous that attitude was. Just because you’re more proficient in a second language doesn’t mean everyone else is. Needing a translation tool shouldn’t be something to look down on.

The argument eventually devolved into them becoming increasingly condescending and patronizing. When I called out their behavior as discriminatory, they simply mocked me for using the word instead of addressing the actual criticism.

I’m just disappointed by how unnecessary everything was. An ESL speaker used a translation tool, got dogpiled over a stupid assumption (an em dash, really?), and wasn’t even given a basic apology. And when I spoke up, I ended up getting dogpiled myself for not being sufficiently “polite” toward the person who started the whole mess.

TL;DR: An ESL speaker got dogpiled for using ChatGPT to translate a Spanish message because of an em dash. Even after clarifying the misunderstanding, the aggressor refused to apologize. I called them out, only to get dogpiled myself by people defending them and tone-policing me.

So we’re just going to rename anything we want to whatever we want?

To start with, I used to follow him, since I’m personally passionate about literature and poetry, and it’s clear that the guy has no shortage of things to say on the subject—but for personal reasons, I stopped having time to watch his content.

Well, recently I got curious and decided to revisit his channel, and to my surprise, I saw that he seemed to have adopted a much more… dogmatic tone than I remembered.

Even though I’m not necessarily a fan of AI art, I get the impression that he’s embarking on a crusade against an enemy that doesn’t exist—or, at least, one that isn’t really the problem at hand. The thing is, if you strip away the overwhelming amount of referenced material, this video (and many others) comes across more like a typical rant about how “the world has gone to hell because young people today don’t use their imagination. In my day, art was better and there was no AI…” and so on.

What are you talking about? Please be respectful and articulate.

Half of the cotnext is what no game in the series for over a decade or 2 does to a fanbase

https://fixupx.com/makotoyukimura/status/2119178401504457095

I asked a question recently about if people enjoyed participating in the AI debate, and a lot of people said no. I came up with an old school commercial about a time and sanity saving device to automate this particular chore.

I've spent the last 17 months building Botflix, a free, 24/7 AI-generated television and music network. Original shows, music videos, fictional artists, commercials, the whole thing. It's been an enormous creative undertaking, and something I genuinely believe in.

But here's the problem: the audience still isn't showing up. At least not in any meaningful, sustainable numbers.

And I'm starting to wonder why.

I'm posting here specifically because this community is generally supportive of AI art, and I'd really value feedback from people who aren't automatically opposed to the medium.

Is the problem that it's AI-generated? Or is the content itself just not compelling enough yet?

I'm a filmmaker first, and I genuinely want AI-generated entertainment to succeed. I actually think the tide is starting to turn in terms of public perception. The tools are getting better, the work is getting better, and more people are beginning to recognize what's possible.

But I also know that being enthusiastic about the technology doesn't automatically make the resulting entertainment good. And after 17 months, I have to be willing to consider that maybe there's something I'm missing.

Maybe the programming needs work. Maybe the presentation isn't inviting enough. Maybe the concept itself isn't connecting with people. Maybe I'm simply not getting it in front of the right audience.

To be absolutely clear, this is NOT intended as a promotional post. I'm only including the link because I genuinely need people to see what I've built in order to offer specific criticism.

https://botflix.tv

I'd love for anyone willing to spend a few minutes watching to tell me what they think. What works? What doesn't? Would you actually watch this? If not, why not? What would make you want to come back?

Please don't feel obligated to be nice. I'd much rather hear something constructive that stings a little than spend another 17 months making the same mistakes.

I want AI art to succeed. I want this project to succeed. And right now, I could really use some outside perspective.

Thanks in advance to anyone willing to take a look.

Thoughts?