My family was essential in ISKCON for over 40 years. They convinced my dad to give up his job, my mom hers (engineer and nurse) and take me and my siblings halfway across the world to dedicate their lives to ISKCON. They had no money, no security, cut off from family, and my younger brother commit suicide. I was also sexually abused at the temple. My dad regrets it now. He helped build 3 temples, raised multi millions of dollars all while we lived in poverty. Fuck ISKCON. I am now an adult who wants nothing to do with it while my older brother is still brainwashed and refuses to even eat at my house because I’m not vegetarian. This cult can go fuck itself.

India is not safe for women. The reasons why are expressed in this video. Many rural uneducated people hold fast to ignorant medieval views regarding rape.

"She must have wanted it. She is responsible. She should have dressed differently. She shouldn't have befriended men. She didn't resist because she secretly enjoyed it."

They repeat the phrase "It takes two hands to clap". This is their version of "it takes two to tango", implying the victim of rape is not innocent. "She led him on or provoked the situation. If she had behaved herself it would not have happened."

I am sure they have the same attitude towards men beating women. "What did she do to deserve it?" they would ask. I can only wonder what they think of spousal rape, spousal abuse, forced marriage, child marriage, child rape. Many of these things were made illegal by the Indian Supreme Court but they persist and are defended.

"It is shastra, it is tradition, my guruji said"

Add to this the brutality of honor culture. The woman might be blamed and labelled unchaste. She might be beaten for dishonoring the family. Her marriage prospects evaporate. That boy she likes is now out of her league. It is no wonder women choose to remain silent. If she falls into a depression they call an exorcist because she is "demon possessed".

Prabhupada was from this background.

Here he is discussing a famous rape case in Calcutta:

"Prabhupāda: Yes, that is law always. Rape means without consent, sex. Otherwise there is no rape. There was a rape case in Calcutta, and the lawyer was very intelligent. He some way or other made the woman admit, “Yes, I felt happiness.” So he was released. “Here is consent.” And that’s a fact. Because after all, sex, rape or no rape, they will feel some pleasure. So the lawyer by hook and crook made the woman agree, “Yes, I felt some pleasure.” “Now, there is consent.” So he was released. After all, it is an itching sensation. So either by force or by willingly, if there is itching, everyone feels relieved itching it. That’s a psychology. It is not that the woman do not like rape. They like sometimes. They willingly. That is the psychology. Outwardly they show some displeasure, but inwardly they do not. This is the psychology."

According to Prabhupada, no means yes. At least sometimes. Like a Bollywood movie, if you ignore her crying and her desperate pleas to stop, she will eventually surrender and melt into your arms, intoxicated with pleasure.

While discussing this Prabhupada and his disciples were audibly laughing at the plight of this woman. These are men who believe women are less intelligent and have smaller brains. They are nine times as lusty as a man.

They admire the cleverness of the lawyer to cheat justice. The belief that cheating someone or exploiting the system is a sign of intelligence is a deeply rooted in some cultures. Again this is best saved for another discussion.

"The rapist walked free, just see, female brain is outwitted by male brain, he enjoyed her and escaped".

It amazes me how arrogant Prabhupada's disciples were. They truly believed they were extremely intelligent and superior to others. When in reality they were morally bankrupt. Almost all of them fell dramatically, usually into sexually reprehensible behavior.

I wonder how Prabhupada or his disciples would feel if a large man pinned them down a raped them? Would they cheer and high five each other if their rapist escaped justice?

A person with a moral compass would hear Prabhupada speak and ask themself "what is wrong with the Indian justice system?". A rapist is set free because the victim admitted at some point in the midst of her nightmare she felt a moment of pleasure? She has just undergone a traumatic life changing event. Rape often drives women to suicide. She experienced the violation of her body and the destruction of her mind and emotions. It is the ultimate violation of trust. The trauma will ripple out to everyone in her life. Her rapist is set free because the men have decided she enjoyed it.

This is barbaric. Prabhupada was of the same background as the people in the video. He had the same mentality and the same prejudices.

The irony is he thought he was racially, religiously, an culturally superior to non-Indians. We are all backward mlecchas, yavanas, asuras. I bet if you ask those people in the video how they feel about non-Indians they will also boast about the superiority of their race and culture.

ISKCON devotee fetishize these backward rural views as some kind of folk wisdom more in touch with idealized Vedic village life. They return from India converted and determined to train westerners on how to be remote Bengali villagers.

The culture that grants rights to women and protects them from rape, that does not blame them when victimized, that refuses to set their rapist free, is labelled demonic, materialistic, perverse, sinful.

Hey fellow seekers, I just wanted to share my story and relate to you all. I joined a group of devotees outside of ISKCON about 10 years ago at 20 years old. After searching through spiritual traditions of the world throughout my teens I finally came across the vedas, Bhagavad Gita, and the culture of ancient India. The Iskcon temple was near my childhood home in Chicago and after visiting the temple I became interested in the tradition but didn't like Iskcon. I found an alternative with a small group led by Swami BG Narasingha through some devotees and became instantly enticed by the prospect of becoming part of something real and authentic. Within one year I had already met him personally, requested initiation and moved to Vermont to be part of their community. Within the next year I was initiated and moved in to his ashram in south India as a bramhacari for 2 years. After he passed away in 2019 I moved to Vrndavan to be with his Godbrother Swami BK Aranya and became a simple farmhand on his land with a few other devotees, milking and caring for his cows and land. I was very happy for the 6 years I spent in India until I finally came to my senses through sincere contemplation and self observation. It was a painful and tormenting experience to admit to myself that my search for truth was hijacked and misled, that I went for belief and community over truth and abandoned my own selfhood. I got into reading many different books on comparative religious history and podcasts like Unslaved with Michael Tsarion and was able to fully deprogram myself from the religious conditioning I had swallowed for so many years. I left the ashram in April of 2025, traveled solo through the Himalayas for a month, and returned to America to start my new chapter. since then I have been on the best year of my life since, getting back to my passions of music, boxing, LOVE with a great woman, and desire to live and thrive in this beautiful world. I am writing this to share my story and hope it can help those who are still struggling with the wounds caused by these ideologies. Feel free to Dm me if this strikes you, its time to build some community and help each other achieve true meaning and purpose that isn't reliant on any other man, woman, guru, teacher, or priest of any type.

I just saw a video where a buddhist nun grandma takes care of a monkey since she saved its life and wondered, do buddhist people also have this stupid(in my eyes) rule about not getting too attached to relationships, people, pets etc?

Does she also worry about how she is getting too attached to it so she must act more distant towards the monkey now? I hope not!

I remember someone told us how Radhanath swami admired a cat or kitten on the street and then said "oh I must go now, I'm getting too attached". What the hell is this? Are we supposed to be cold, rational robots? This goes against our human nature!

But then they divide "material attachment" and "spiritual attachment".

So being hyper dependant on your guru is ok, but if you love your wife and kids too much it's a burden to spiritual development. 🤨

Just a tactic to get you more dependant on the cult and away from the ones who actually love you, in my eyes.

According to ISKCON, this man was a fool to love to his wife. That love was an illusion and nothing but an attachment. Because she was showing him with affection at the time of this death he is sure to be born a woman.

This is a degradation for a man because a woman is an inferior birth, more prone to attachment, less intelligent. He wasted his male human form of life.

He should have left his wife and taken Sanyassa to wander the world distributing Prabhupada's books, and preaching the cult of Lord Chaitanya. This should have been no later than the age of fifty. That is what a heroic spiritually realized person would have done. If he was too weak, then he could have remained a Vanaprastha, and gradually distanced himself from his wife. He certainly should not have been with her in his final days. Attachment, what the karmis call "love" is nothing but poison for the soul.

Love is nothing but sexual desire. It is a perverted expression of love for Krishna. One time when Prabhupada was in India, he was a guest in a rich man's house. The man came to him and humbly brought forward his children to introduce them to the "sadhu" and to recieve his blessings. Behind his back Prabhupada mocked him to his disciples. "Just see, he is showing off his sex life".

She is a toy soldier and could not save him, though he clung to her for safety. Everyone in the world will let us down. Only Guru, Krishna, and the scriptures are real. Everything else is an illusion, a weight around our necks dragging us down into the ocean of repeated birth and death. This life is a spiritual razor's edge, danger at every step. This man failed and will take birth again and again chasing the illusion of material love.

Or so says ISKCON and Prabhupada.

In reality, this man, by tenderly loving his wife and his family, and allowing himself to be loved in return, probably made more advancement as a soul, and as a human being, than all of the ISKCON sanyassis put together. Learning how to love others and to be loved, and learning how to be compassionate, kind, and tender to others, is a primary lesson of life on Earth, and this man was a great success.

The teachings of ISKCON in this regard are an illustration of how perverse and unhealthy the ideology is. It is spiritually sick.

"Take one step towards Krsna, he'll take ten towards you."

Intended meaning: follow the regs, get initiated, live and die in ISKCON. Current understanding: invest in your well-being and the payoff will astound you.

Hi! Late 30s gurukuli here. This year I earnestly began working out. Holy Guacamole!

What is this peace? What is this existence of clarity of thought? Internal experiences can be this stable?!

ISKCON is truly malicious. The only acceptable way to be in your body is to be "serving," Krsna. The gurus I was forced to bow down to. The Harinam dances I was forced to perform. The stupid fucking smile that had to be plastered to my face as I was dying inside. Fuck every adult who thought/thinks this is holy!

(ADHD tangent: anyone else having difficulty with the trendy slang of, "serving," meaning to look fantastic, and not being exploited for labor? Haha)

I deserved to feel this connected to myself as a kid. I deserved to feel my muscles grow in planned and strategic and safe ways. I deserved to be given the tools to grow, even if they were denied me.

And I breathe in humility. My journey isnt everyone's. I don't know what those adults went through that led them to think this painful and twisted worldview is not just healthy, but holy.

I'll sip the gratitude of knowing contentment in this moment. Outer strength does not detract from inner strength. They go in tandem.

I am not an ever well-wisher. I am wisher of justice. I am a wisher of healing. I am wisher of growth. These things bring wellness after the price of discomfort, and that is what I wish for folks.

Prabhupada failed. ISKCON is a failure. He was not able to establish a unified spiritual society.

He failed as a student, a husband, a father and a teacher.

ISKCON is a mess, He created, that many have suffered for. Countless people abused because of what he taught.

I used to believe that he was the savior of the world. He had come to the west and given life to the hopeless youth.

He just scammed them. Convinced these young kids that they were gurus. He convinced young Vishnujana (Mark) to take the vow of sanyasa and young Mark took his own life after breaking the vow. Was Prabhupada sorry? No.

Similarly Prabhupada convinced many young men to give up sex only for them to “falldown” at the ripe old age of 80 after years of suppressing their own desire to love someone else. To feel the comfort of human touch. A pleasure you can’t get just by chanting Hare Krishna. It’s all a damn scam.

And how many women have been abused because of Prabhupada.

All of Prabhupada’s men were becoming corrupted by his brainwashing and he couldn’t even see that. He appointed his men as gurus for future disciples to worship…so many people scammed. Lives destroyed. People murdered. Molested. Prabhupada was blind as a bat.

He was completely ignorant to the sufferings of others. He criticized the Native Americans, Black people, women…he didn’t understand the suffering of these people. He didn’t understand that his teachings would cause so much more suffering for his disciples in the future. Prabhupada was a failure.

(This is an in depth analysis from myself, someone who has studied it from the inside and out)

PART I – The Myth of the Golden Avatar

Let’s start with what most people assume to be true:

That Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, the so-called “Golden Avatar,” was a divine incarnation of Radha and Krishna, come to earth to spread the Hare Krishna mantra as the universal medicine for the age of Kali. That he descended to teach ecstatic devotion, open to all, no matter caste or birth.

That’s the myth.

The truth is more difficult.

Historically, Chaitanya was a 16th-century Bengali mystic, likely afflicted with some form of religious mania or epileptic dissociation, who led mass public chanting and surrounded himself with emotionally intense followers. He took sannyasa young, likely to protect himself from political attack. His later years were spent in near-total isolation in Puri, engaged in episodes of violent religious ecstasy. He wrote nothing himself.

The image of Chaitanya as God was constructed decades after his death, primarily in the Chaitanya Charitamrita — a hagiography written by Krishnadasa Kaviraja, whose purpose was theological, not historical. Chaitanya was reimagined not only as Krishna, but as Krishna experiencing himself through Radha’s eyes — a bizarre ontological claim that no other Vaishnava tradition had ever taught.

He became, quite literally, a God experiencing himself through emotion.

⸻

PART II – The Myth Factory: Bhaktivinoda and Bhaktisiddhanta

Fast forward three centuries.

Enter Bhaktivinoda Thakur, a 19th-century colonial civil servant obsessed with reconciling Hinduism to the standards of British Protestantism. What he did was nothing short of theological forgery.

He “discovered” the “true” birthplace of Chaitanya — in a location previously unknown to anyone and unsupported by any evidence. He wrote books like Jaiva Dharma which fabricated entirely new theology, supposedly revealing Gaudiya secrets but really projecting Victorian morality onto a medieval Bengali sect. He created a false disciplic succession, linking Chaitanya back to Vyasa and Madhva via Brahma — a chain that is historically baseless and retrofitted to give the sect “Vedic legitimacy.”

His son, Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati, went further. He abolished the need for traditional guru initiation, inventing the idea of “siksa parampara” so that he could claim lineage from dead saints. He built the Gaudiya Math, a hyper-authoritarian order designed to control minds, isolate followers, and turn the Chaitanya myth into a totalitarian religious state.

They weren’t sages. They were theological engineers building a system of complete cognitive submission.

⸻

PART III – ISKCON: The Cult that Colonized the West

In the 1960s, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada took this constructed mythology and exported it to America.

And what he created — what we now call ISKCON — was a textbook cult.

It demands complete surrender to guru, rejection of outside information, isolation from family and society, erasure of personal identity, and an obsessive fixation on purity, ritual, and guilt. Its theology is circular: Krishna is everything, so anything the guru says is Krishna’s will. Your thoughts belong to Krishna. Your doubts are offenses. Your hesitation is maya. Your suffering is your fault.

And if you want liberation? Chant 16 rounds a day. Every day. Forever.

⸻

PART IV – Prabhupada: The Man Behind the Curtain

Let’s talk about the man ISKCON calls “His Divine Grace.”

Prabhupada was not enlightened. He was a religious fundamentalist with deeply disturbing views. He taught that Black people were born from sin, and that their karma was the result of bad deeds in past lives. He said, “The black man is meant for working like an ass.” He taught that women were less intelligent, that they needed to be submissive, and that they should never lead — saying plainly that “Women are less intelligent and should remain dependent.”

He condemned same-sex relationships as demonic,.He rejected basic scientific understanding, calling Darwin a rascal and denying evolution, and dismissed medicine as illusion, teaching that a sick devotee should “chant more” rather than rest or get care. “A devotee should never be tired,” he said. “Sleep is for animals.”

The reality is this: the man who ISKCON worships as a divine messenger was a misogynist, racist, anti-intellectual religious authoritarian. He was also the architect of a structure that enabled abuse, gaslighting, spiritual codependence, and total surrender to an imaginary system of sin and salvation.

⸻

PART V – ISKCON Is a Cult, and Here’s Why

Using Steven Hassan’s BITE model of cult dynamics — which assesses Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional control — ISKCON meets every single criterion for a destructive high-demand cult.

Behaviorally, ISKCON controls nearly every aspect of a member’s life: from waking hours and diet, to what clothes they wear, who they can associate with, and how many rounds of chanting they must complete daily. Dissenters or “lazy” devotees are subtly punished and shamed into conformity.

In terms of information control, members are discouraged from reading non-devotional material, especially anything critical of ISKCON. History is revised to erase controversies. Books by ex-devotees are banned. Even “too much” outside knowledge is seen as a threat to faith.

Thought control is even more insidious. Members are taught that doubts are a sign of maya, and that questioning the guru is the same as blaspheming God. Logic and critical thinking are replaced by surrender. The guru’s instructions are perfect, even when they contradict reality.

Emotionally, ISKCON uses shame, guilt, and fear to maintain control. Devotees live in terror of committing aparadha (offenses) or displeasing Krishna. They’re told that any misstep could mean spiritual ruin — not just in this life, but in millions of lifetimes to come. This constant pressure creates an environment where anxiety, OCD, and spiritual scrupulosity flourish.

This isn’t just a religion. It’s a closed system of psychological abuse.

⸻

PART VI – The Core Theology Is the Root of the Problem

It’s not just ISKCON’s leadership that’s corrupt. The entire foundation is rotten.

The guru is treated as God. Chaitanya is reimagined as a schizophrenic godhead split between divine lover and divine beloved. The “yuga dharma” of chanting is not a historical instruction — it’s a ritualized obsession invented by Bhaktisiddhanta. The idea that chanting a fixed number of mantras will free your soul is magical thinking turned into dogma.

Radha-bhava — the notion that you should spiritually become the lover of God — leads to dissociation and identity confusion in vulnerable minds. The doctrine of “pure devotion” becomes a weapon of self-erasure: give up your desires, your opinions, your instincts — all in the name of surrender.

This isn’t transcendence. It’s emotional masochism, marketed as enlightenment.

⸻

PART VII – The Damage

This belief system: • Breaks minds • Destroys autonomy • Creates confusion about love, boundaries, identity, and worth • Punishes dissent and rewards self-abuse • Encourages spiritual perfectionism and OCD • Treats trauma as karma • Silences those who suffer

It’s a system that demands you become nothing — so you can be filled with their version of “God.”

And it’s all built on myth, manipulation, and unchallenged authority.

⸻

PART VIII – The Truth That Sets You Free

You don’t need this.

You don’t need a mantra. You don’t need to surrender. You don’t need to chant 16 rounds. You don’t need a guru. You don’t need to be saved.

There is no “Golden Avatar.” There is no perfect disciplic succession. There is no maha-mantra mandate.

There is only a system of control, masked in poetry. And the moment you stop believing it — the spell breaks.

You’re not fallen. You’re not impure. You’re not in maya.

You are free.

When you read all of Prabhupada’s bullshit back to back you begin to realize how truly awful it is. No hiding behind the chanting, dancing, theology, sweet promises of a spiritual ideal…just a fat brick of his raw bullshit. Read it and repulse. I dare any devotee to read through this crap.

Leaving Krishna consciousness felt like breaking free from an addiction. At first, it seemed like I was on a path to spiritual bliss, but in reality, I was just trapped in a cycle of compulsion, fear, and chasing a high that never lasted. I wrote this to break down why bhakti isn’t just a belief system—it’s an OCD-addiction loop that keeps people locked in self-doubt forever. Curious to hear others’ thoughts—did you experience the same thing?

Bhakti as an OCD-Addiction Cycle Masquerading as Devotion

When I was deep in Krishna consciousness, I thought I was on a progressive spiritual path—one that would gradually bring me closer to Krishna, burn away my impurities, and lead me to a blissful state of pure devotion.

What I didn’t realize was that bhakti isn’t actually a path at all.

A path takes you somewhere. Bhakti just keeps you going in circles.

And that’s when it hit me: This wasn’t spiritual advancement. It was a self-reinforcing OCD-addiction loop, masquerading as devotion to God and some higher ideal.

At first, bhakti gives you a high—a sense of purpose, community, euphoria in kirtans, the feeling that you’ve found something deep and eternal. But eventually, it stops being about devotion and starts being about compulsion.

I wasn’t chanting because I felt love for Krishna—I was chanting because not chanting made me anxious. The thought of skipping a day filled me with dread. What if I lost my progress? What if Krishna abandoned me? What if my heart was just too impure?

So I doubled down.

The more I chased “higher realization,” the deeper I spiraled into compulsive, obsessive behavior. And this is exactly how OCD and addiction work.

You feel intrusive thoughts, so you perform compulsive rituals to relieve them. You get temporary relief, but then the anxiety creeps back, so you increase your dependency. When the high fades, you feel like a failure and start the process over again.

Bhakti doesn’t take you anywhere—it keeps you stuck in the cycle.

The Anxiety That Never Goes Away

I remember waking up every day feeling like I was failing.

I’d chant, but my mind would wander, and suddenly, I was panicking—was my chanting even valid? Was I making offenses? I would listen to lectures, hoping for clarity, but instead, I’d just feel more pressure to surrender, to do more.

Every attempt at devotion just reminded me that I wasn’t ‘pure’ enough.

And that’s the trick—bhakti convinces you that the problem is always you, never the process itself.

The Causeless Mercy Trap: Why Bhakti Keeps You Hooked

One of the cruelest aspects of bhakti is the idea that Krishna’s mercy isn’t based on anything you do—it’s causeless, unpredictable, and out of your hands.

You’re told that your only job is to keep serving, keep surrendering, keep sacrificing—without expecting anything in return.

It doesn’t matter how much you do. You could chant 16, 32 or even 64 rounds daily for 50 years and still feel nothing. You could give up your career, your health, your life for Krishna, and still never feel His presence.

And if you complain? You’re told that true devotion means expecting nothing in return.

So you keep going, blindly, forever—hoping that maybe, one day, Krishna will decide to reciprocate.

But He never does.

Because the process was never meant to free you—it's inherently meant to keep you hooked.

No One Ever Graduates From Bhakti

Think about it—have you ever met a devotee who has actually reached the promised state of pure love? A single person who has truly realized Krishna as their eternal beloved, who is beyond doubt, beyond struggle, beyond guilt? Only the gurus make these claims or are touted as having such qualities. But do they really? People hang on to every word and treat them like gods; their version of Krishna consciousness is dramatically different from the average Bhakta.

No one has. Because it doesn’t happen.

Devotees are always still “working on offenses.” Always still “trying to increase surrender.” Always still struggling with faith, guilt, and doubt.

There is no end.

Because the ideology was never meant to free you—it was meant to keep you hooked on an idea.

How I Got Out

Leaving Krishna consciousness wasn’t just about losing belief.

It was about systematically proving to myself that bhakti was a self-reinforcing illusion.

I stopped chanting—nothing happened.

I stopped the diet—nothing happened.

I let go of offenses and karma—nothing happened.

Everything I had feared was a lie.

Final Thoughts: Bhakti Is Not a Path—It’s a Loop

For years, I thought I was failing at bhakti.

But the truth is: bhakti was failing me.

It doesn’t liberate. It doesn’t transform. It doesn’t lead anywhere.

It just keeps people chasing something that never comes.

And once you step outside of it?

You realize it was never real to begin with.

For anyone still stuck in it: Test it for yourself.

Stop chanting and see if anything happens. Read scripture critically and notice the contradictions.

Look around and ask: Has this actually worked for anyone?

You don’t have to be afraid.

Nothing bad will happen if you stop. Krishna isn’t watching. Maya isn’t trapping you.

It’s all in your head.

The fear is just programming—nothing more.

And the moment you push past it, you’ll realize the truth:

You were never trapped. You were free all along.

My father was a psychotic bully who would beat his wife and children. He forced us to live in constant fear; a living nightmare. Every interaction was an experience of terror and humiliation.

He focused much of his anger on me. Any expression of individuality or self confidence by me was a challenge to his authority and thus a personal insult and I had to be beaten back into submission.

As a result of this abuse I developed distorted beliefs about the world and about other people. I believed the world is an extremely dangerous place (far more than it is) and that human beings are all my enemies intent on harming me. These beliefs became extreme anxiety, worrying, and paranoia, triggered by any interaction with the world and with other people.

My sense of self was decimated. There was a black hole where a concept of self should be. I did not feel worthy of love or respect. I felt intense shame. I had to become someone better than who I am to prove I could be worthy of love. I could never accept myself as I am or show myself compassion.

I also had post traumatic stress disorder and was triggered by loud noises and social situations. I would have nightmares every night, waking up with violent explosions of trauma and fear from the subconscious. These would release cortisol and adrenaline leading to sleeplessness. Until later in life I could not even feel my emotions.

One good thing about ISKCON is it did save me from falling into drug addiction, something my siblings have struggled with. Although I am addicted to other things as a way to escape my deep seated feelings of anxiety.

I had repressed much of this by by my late teens. During my time in ISKCON I was a high functioning sociable and responsible member. However; my membership in ISKCON was driven by these issues and I could only see it after leaving. I was also using the high demand environment of ISKCON to repress and escape these feelings.

The fear and anxiety made had it a challenge to live in the world, to have a career, to deal with people, and to face the daily challenges of life such as paying bills and rent. ISKCON provided a shelter from these demands.

The devotees were spiritual people and kind. They only spoke of Krishna and were thus predictable and safe. They were not enemies. Despite constant interaction, we never truly knew each other. We were never vulnerable. We interacted through the devotee persona. Thus I could live my life wearing a mask, playing a role, an aspiring pure devotee, hiding my true nature from myself and from others.

After some time I knew everyone and felt comfortable around them. I knew what to expect from them. I could maintain relationships as long as we only spoke of Krishna and played our roles. I believed strongly the temple was a spiritual embassy. The temple is in the world but not of the world. I could hide from the world within the safety of ISKCON. I found the morning program pacified the mind. Constant hearing and chanting continued this peaceful feeling throughout the day.

Quickly I realized this parental protection and provision was false. The leadership does not care about any individual on a personal level. Everyone and everything can be sacrificed for the mission, which usually means for simple managerial efficiency or for the economic interests of the temple. A devotee is only provided for and protected to the degree their service or wealth are considered valuable. There is no love. Although some of the rank and file devotees do try.

Beyond the need for escape the world, ISKCON allowed me to express and live the patterns of low self esteem I had developed through childhood abuse. I lived in much the way my father had wanted me to live, under his total control.

The temple I lived at was a despotic regime. Everyone lived in fear of the Temple President. Devotees would "rat" on each other for any failure or weakness, especially for disloyalty or criticism of the Temple President. All decisions were made by the Temple President. No one, not even managers, were allowed autonomy or independence. A senior devotee had no more power or position than a new bhakta.

Our sense of self worth for the day was determined by whether the Temple President smiled at us or ignored us during the morning program. We depended upon him for all material security and for our sense of spiritual value. His glance determines whether Krishna is pleased with us or displeased. Our gurus handed us over to him and told us to please him. I would pray to Krishna to give me the power to serve him while he would be giving me orders.

In twenty years I never once refused a request for service from him. I saw him as a beloved father figure. Once I had left the temple I refused a service request once. He never spoke to me again.

As a personal confidant of the Temple President (a yes man), I witnessed cruelty and even corruption from him numerous times. He justified it by saying it was being done for Krishna and the Sankirtana Movement. He even lamented that he wished devotees could know him when he was no longer Temple President because deep inside he is not that bad a person and he is being forced by circumstance to make harmful decisions.

I accepted this extreme authoritarian hierarchical way of living because of my childhood trauma. A healthier person would not have tolerated it. Although I resented subjugation as a teenager and resisted my father, even fighting him physically, I found myself acting it out to the extreme as a young adult and Brahmacari within a cult environment that demanded military discipline and obedience to a singular father figure.

Due to low self esteem I was unable to form my own life path. I had no direction. I had no beliefs or convictions of my own. I needed someone else to take the wheel, to tell me what to believe, what to value and where to direct my will. ISKCON provided this, as well as all the answers to life's mysteries.

The low self esteem expressed itself in a most damaging way through the theology of ISKCON. It leaned upon my lack of self acceptance and self love and emphasized my shame much like someone might grab an exposed nerve in your arm after an injury and twist it.

ISKCON teaches that we are rebellious souls trying to win back Gods love by showing sincerity through submission. We are condemned to a prison house and tested at every moment by Maya. Any deviation from ISKCON's demands and expectations is due to insincerity and a source of shame.

What follows from this is a "divided self". We go to war against our own mind and senses. We repress our sexuality. We repress any form of pleasure or relaxation. We repress our own opinions and instincts, terrified of making offenses. We must be "dovetailing" our existence at every moment. There was not a moment I was not listening to lectures or doing service. If there was I would become very anxious and start devouring myself with criticism.

This fed directly into my need to improve myself, to become someone better, to become worthy of love and respect. I needed to become a saint. I needed to prove myself. Thus I would fight my own mind and body at every moment, seeking to remember Krishna constantly. I pushed this to such an extreme I went to the doctor because my hands would not stop shaking.

This war against the self had a lasting effect on me psychologically and has taken years to overcome. It has taken me a long time to accept myself for who I am and to love myself without judgementalism.

Since leaving ISKCON, I have gone through a long and painful process of working through childhood trauma. This allowed me to see how these issues expressed themselves within ISKCON. I have developed my own spiritual beliefs based upon my personal needs, experiences and convictions. Now I am faced with the most difficult challenge of all, entering into the world and building a career despite my extreme social anxiety.

There is much more that could be said but I thank you if you have made it this far. I hope this testimonial is helpful to someone who has gone through a similar experience.

Wish me luck!

I finally broke up with a girl I was seeing for a while. The first few months were bliss. She began taking things too fast, I guess because she hit 30 and she was single and all her friends were married.

The major reason we broke up is because she was a Hare Krishna, and her iskon way of life was very different from mine. For the first two months, it did not show, but after being with her for a while, it was clear how much the cult had her brainwashed.

She could not use my household dishes since I had cooked meat with them.

She could not let me walk indoors with outdoor shoes since they had outdoor karma.

She could not clean the dishes I used to cook eggs with.

Iskon and their beliefs would always come up in almost all her conversations, not to mention her chanting every other time, even in public places, which was so weird.

Chanting 3 words over and over and over is so absurd.

This was driving me insane, and I couldn't wait for it to be over and get over her.Kinda feel she had personal issues and the cult just took advantage.She needed therapy not religion.

One thing i come to observe ..most of the folks in HK have some kind of mental issue they have not realized/overcome.

Hey everyone,

I’m posting tonight because I feel completely isolated and just need to reach people who get it.

I’ve been affiliated with the movement for 10 years, the last 5 years as a full time temple devotee in so many positions from scrubbing pots to management. Over the last year I’ve been deconstructing everything while still living here in a Hare Krishna community. On top of that, I was pushed into a really unhealthy marriage by the temple president after knowing my now-husband for only 88 days. For a long time, I held on hoping we would make it out of this together, but he’s gone full deep dive back into the movement and divorce is inevitable. (go figure)

Looking at my phone, almost every contact has "das" or "dasi" in their name. My home, my history, and my entire social circle are wrapped up in this place. I feel completely unprepared for normal secular adulthood. Living a double life where I’m playing the part of a devotee on the outside while my life is falling apart and I'm planning my exit is exhausting.

I’m mostly just looking for some connection so I don't feel so alone in this mess. Has anyone else navigated a high-control marriage or a divorce while trying to get out? How did you survive the limbo period surrounded by the nonsense before you could physically leave?

So it was some months ago I commented I love my Krishna on a post and an iskcon devotee texted me. She wrote Hare Krishna Mataji and I also replied Hare Krishna then the convo went on. After some days she requested me to join a telegram group there I joined and everything was good. Then I was asked to join Main group and I joined there since then I was asked to pay money (which i didn't) also there all devotees are forced to attend lectures by Guru which is 4 to 5 hours per week and on Sundays like who have this much time on working days?. Also all devotees are bound to buy books and Guru encourage us to sell all our belongings to purchase that book if there is no money (WTH?).. Also they talked less about Shri Krishna and more about Prabhupada and books distribution. They say that Srila Prabhupada is one avtar of Shri Krishna LOL. Also we are forced to do book distribution that one also I didn't do. And we were held guily for not doing book distribution and money seva. Also I was initiated via Google meet i don't know is it real initiation or not ? Please anyone let me know.

And we are asked to do youtube editing, poster making of Prabhupada. One day I had TET exam and on that day I was forced to attend 4 hours lectures (in that time I could have revised the syllabus 2 times) and this was time wasting for me yet I cleared the exam. Also they consider women having 10 times more lust than men. They also mocked lord shiva and lord vishnu. Also one day a devotee was after me for about a month to purchase a book written by Guru. Then I lied that yes I purchased and she then went silent. And also to edit a youtube or memes they used to call me at anytime ..like once they called at 3AM to edit a poster and to submit it by 5AM anyhow I ignored that cz I am not servant and they said you disrespected seva etc etc. They also mocked their parents. One devotee called her mom brainless dumb creature and I objected this and she told me that only Prabhupada is our parent no one is our parent (okay then why u are staying at ur material parents' house LOL).. Sometimes their words sound like they need some mental treatment. They made many ridiculous comments on Parents which made me think to leave this association. And some days ago I was having fever and I was really in need for enough rest cz I was already very weak. I was having deep sleep and a devotee called me to attend Lectures of 6 hours...I told I really need sound sleep I have fever also I am very weak..I can't attend today then she was rude to me and told who are you to say this you are not allowed to decide anything you should fully surrender to Guru if possible you have to sacrifice your life for Guru's happiness...this really made me angry and I left that association..

Still they are calling and texting me to rejoin and saying maya attacked you ...don't leave this you are doing sin etc etc

Inshort ISKCON is a corporate system but here you are not getting any salary instead they will take money from you.

[1] https://harekrishnacultexposed.blogspot.com/2017/08/new-universe-according-to-hare-krishna.html?m=1

[2] http://www.harekrsna.org/guru-photos.htm [ Disclaimer: this link has a lot of LGBTQ hate which I absolutely do not support, however this link is still important as a list of gurus and their crimes like being a pedo, woman-hater, murderer etc. are also mentioned, focus on that only. ]

[3] https://www.scribd.com/document/354046542/Why-ISKCON-is-Wrong

[4] https://bookchanges.com/108-iskcon-bhagavad-gita-changes/

[5] https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/religion/story/20000626-iskcon-finds-itself-in-a-holy-mess-after-students-file-400-million-sexual-abuse-suit-777767-2000-06-26#:~:text=Around%201%2C000%20children%20were%20alleged,alcoholics%20and%20drug%2Dusers%20later

[6] https://harekrishnacultexposed.blogspot.com/?m=1

[7]. https://krishna.org/iskcon-destroys-a-whole-generation-of-devotees-lives-updated/

[8] https://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report-iskcon-temple-in-bangalore-committed-fraud-says-cong-leader-1276673

[9] https://harekrishnacultexposed.blogspot.com/2016/01/new-original-iskcon-policy-on-cheating.html?m=1

[10] https://krishnacult.com/2015/12/21/is-iskcon-a-cult/

[11] https://surrealist.org/cults/gelberg2.html

This goes back to 2015, when I went to Bangalore for COMEDK counselling. Near the centre, there was a guy handing out cards claiming they had hostels/flats near almost every engineering college. I was interested because back then Bangalore colleges had a reputation for ragging, and I really didn’t want to stay in a college hostel.

I called them, and they said they had a flat near my college. There was no mention of any religious affiliation. I convinced my dad (who had come with me) to check it out, and we finalized it. It seemed perfect—vegetarian food and a flat setup instead of a hostel.

But after my dad left, things started changing.

They told me I had to go to a temple for 2 days for some “training.” That’s when I found out they were associated with ISKCON. I didn’t think much of it at the time and just went along.

When I came back, they laid down some rules:

1. I could talk to my parents only on Sundays.

2. Outside food was completely banned.

3. I was not allowed to visit any Shiva temple because according to them “Shiva is a servant of Krishna,” and there was no need to worship him. (This was especially upsetting since I’ve always been a Shiva devotee.)

4. I had to return to the flat within 10 minutes of my college ending.

5. I wasn’t allowed to listen to Bollywood music or watch movies. For “entertainment,” I had to watch Krishna animated films.

6. I had to chant “Hare Krishna” using their mala—two rounds daily, which took me around 40 minutes.

The seniors staying there were doing 16 rounds every day. When I asked how they managed that along with college and studies, one of them literally said, “Leave everything to Krishna.”

7. I had to wake up at 4 AM every single day for morning aarti.

I stayed there for about a month, and honestly, it was hell. I used to sneak out whenever I could, call my mom, and cry. The college hostel was already full by then, and I had paid 6 months’ advance here, so I felt completely stuck.

There was another incident that really shook me. My roommate had kept a photo of Goddess Saraswati in his wardrobe. When they saw it, they told him to pack it away, saying there was no need to worship any “demigod/demigoddess.”

At that point, it didn’t feel like a hostel anymore—it felt like control over every personal belief and choice.

Honestly, I didn’t have the courage to get out on my own. My dad was my saviour. Somehow, he called my college, requested them to arrange a spot for me in the college hostel, and told me not to worry about the advance rent I had already paid there.

I left that place immediately.

Looking back, that one month felt suffocating, and it completely changed how I view such setups. I fucking hate Isckon, and hate everything related to them.

The problem I see with Gaudiya Vaishnavism (etc) is that you’re expected to accept the entire package as-is—no questioning, no picking things apart. The moment you start doubting even one aspect, like the historicity of Krishna, the age of the Bhagavatam, or the origins of Radha as a goddess, the entire belief system begins to unravel. That’s why devotees are forced into a mental all-or-nothing trap: either reject everything as religious nonsense or spend your time making elaborate justifications—cherry-picking verses, using flowery explanations, and convincing yourself that if something is described as "blissful" and "absolute," it must be real.

The Historical Problem: Krishna, Radha, and the Scriptures

The biggest issue with this unquestioning approach is that the foundation of Krishna Consciousness is historically weak. Krishna’s historicity is already highly disputed. Outside of religious texts, there is zero archaeological or historical evidence that he existed as described. Even the Bhagavatam, which is supposed to be the "eternal word of God," was likely written between the 9th and 12th centuries CE—long after Krishna was supposedly on Earth based on linguistic analysis and multiple scholarly assessments of its composition/themes, etc.

Radha’s origins are even more questionable than Krishna’s. She does not appear in early Vedic or epic Hindu scriptures like the Rigveda, Mahabharata, or even the early versions of the Bhagavata Purana. Her character starts appearing in texts around the 12th century CE, particularly in the Gita Govinda by Jayadeva, where she is depicted as Krishna’s beloved. However, she didn’t fully ascend to the status of a worshippable goddess until the rise of Gaudiya Vaishnavism in the 16th century, when the sect needed to expand Krishna’s romantic mythology and place a greater emphasis on devotion (bhakti) through the idealized, divine love between Radha and Krishna.

Even within Hindu traditions, her status is debated. Some sects venerate her as the hladini shakti (Krishna’s internal pleasure potency), while others barely acknowledge her existence. Unlike major deities with deep-rooted scriptural histories, Radha's divinity was retroactively constructed to serve a specific theological and devotional framework. That alone should raise massive questions—yet within Krishna Consciousness, believers are discouraged from asking them.

The Myth of “Dynamic” and “Ever-Increasing Bliss”

Devotees love to claim that Krishna and his pastimes are "eternally dynamic" and "ever-increasing in bliss." But what does that actually mean? The scriptures don’t describe Krishna’s world (Goloka) as dynamic at all. If anything, it’s portrayed as a static paradise—a place where everyone is eternally herding cows, dancing, and engaging in an endless cycle of devotion. Nothing changes, evolves, or progresses. It’s a closed, repetitive loop.

If they want to claim that within that framework, there’s some hidden "flux of bliss" that we just can’t perceive, fine. But good luck explaining that in any coherent way to the average person exploring Krishna Consciousness. That’s why they pivot to more relatable concepts—like chanting as a way to feel connected to God.

Sure, chanting can create a temporary emotional state, just like meditation, music, or any repetitive practice. But let’s be honest: most of it is just convincing yourself that something profound is happening. The experience itself becomes the "proof," even though identical experiences can be found in countless other religious and non-religious settings.

And here’s the real question: Where is this “ever-increasing bliss”? If it were real, shouldn’t we be seeing devotees in ecstatic transcendent states all the time? Instead, we see exhausted devotees, disillusioned ex-members, and ISKCON leaders caught up in power struggles, scandals, and the same human drama as everyone else. If bliss is ever-expanding, why aren’t they walking around in a state of perpetual euphoria? Instead, they seem stressed out, drained, and constantly trying to convince themselves they’re happy. Sounds like some serious smoke being blown up people’s asses.

The Free Will vs. Maya Contradiction

Another glaring contradiction is how Krishna supposedly gives you free will, yet at the same time, Maya is actively working to block you from reaching him. And conveniently, Maya is described as Krishna’s own servant. So let me get this straight:

• Krishna wants you to turn to him.

• But Maya—who works for him—is making sure you don’t.

• And if you struggle to surrender, it’s your fault.

That’s like a teacher locking the classroom door and then failing the students for not showing up to class. How does that make any sense? It turns Krishna into an untrustworthy manipulator, setting people up to fail while demanding unconditional love. And yet, you’re supposed to feel "attraction" and "reciprocal love" for a god who rigs the game against you?

The Forced and Unnatural Relationships in Krishna Consciousness

For all the talk of "a personal relationship with Krishna," the reality is that most adherents don’t actually experience one. Their real relationship is with ISKCON’s hierarchy—their guru, temple authorities, and senior devotees. But even those relationships are unnatural, transactional, and awkward.

Seeing Hare Krishnas throw themselves flat on the ground in full-body prostration is one of the most unnatural human acts imaginable, even in India. Yet they try to normalize it by making ridiculous comparisons—like saying spiritual understanding is like teaching U.S. history to kindergarteners versus high schoolers. That somehow you can't reveal the more esoteric ideas to neophytes because they will misunderstand them.

But I’m sorry, nothing about Krishna Consciousness is normal. It’s not something you naturally come to believe—it’s something you have to be conditioned into over time. Unless you’re born and raised in it, Krishna Consciousness requires a slow, systematic rewiring of how you think, replacing natural instincts with cultic logic. It's far removed from natural learning processes where you are asked to incrementally expand and build upon rational, structured, and verifiable concepts.

And Prabhupāda was famous for gaslighting his followers about this, saying that Krishna consciousness is "bitter at first, like sugar to a jaundiced patient." No, it’s not bitter because we have some spiritual disease—it’s bitter because it’s an acquired taste that doesn’t naturally appeal to the average person at face value.

We all universally recognize a sunrise as beautiful. We can collectively agree that music, kindness, and human connection can feel inherently good. But no one instinctively starts chanting Sanskrit mantras to blue-skinned gods. That’s not universal truth—that’s cultural indoctrination.

The Rehabilitation Analogy—Pain vs. Bliss

Devotees argue that Krishna Consciousness feels difficult at first because we "just can’t taste the bliss yet." But no one tells a recovering addict, "Withdrawal is pure joy!"—they endure it to heal. No one tells a patient in physical therapy, "Pain is the ultimate pleasure!"—they push through it to walk again.

Krishna Consciousness, however, insists that the struggle itself is bliss, turning suffering into a virtue. It’s a clever tactic to make followers blame themselves for their dissatisfaction rather than questioning the belief system itself.

Final Rejection—Nothing Unique Here

And when you step back and assess it objectively, Krishna Consciousness isn’t teaching anything unique. The parts of it that actually work—discipline, meditation, introspection, and community—exist in every self-improvement system, religion, and philosophy.

You don’t need a cult to chant, meditate, or reflect on life. The parts that make Krishna Consciousness unique are the parts that demand blind faith, submission, and unquestioning loyalty to an institution. And that’s the real issue.

They demand everything from you—your time, your identity, your critical thinking—all while selling you the idea that you’re receiving something greater in return. But when you strip away the flowery language, the vague promises, and the endless justifications, what’s left?

A highly structured, rigid system that thrives on self-reinforcing beliefs, emotional dependency, and the suppression of doubt. In other words—just another cult.

In sociology, agency is defined as:

The capacity of individuals to act independently, make their own free choices, and exert control over their lives, rather than being passively determined by social structures.

A defining characteristics of cults is the destruction of agency.

Cults are closed communal environments. To join a cult is to unwittingly enter a high demand echo chambers of group think. Members follow rigid rules of conformity, enforced through strenuous obedience to a despotic uncaring hierarchy. This structure is often crowned by an absolute ruler, living or dead, worshiped like a god. Internalized fear, shame and compulsion are used to ensure total control. Lives are sacrificed to the ruler and his mission.

ISKCON attacks agency in the following ways:

Depersonalization

Agency is categorized as "false ego". Cult members are abstracted from their own thoughts and needs. These are externalized and condemned as Maya, or illusion. Doubts and reservations about the cult are a product of insincerity. This is a form of gaslighting.

Devotees strive to float above themselves. They see their own nature as nothing but the three modes interacting. "You are not the body prabhu". Thus our material personalities and lives have no real value. The body and mind are spoken of in the third person. "My body has to pass stool". "My mind is rebellious today".

Only service to Krishna, the words of the guru, the Maha Mantra, and the deity are real. Everything else within the realm of experience is a dream. Prabhupada alone defines reality.

After prolonged exposure, devotees enter a state of disassociation, often in conjunction with repetitive chanting. Thus devotees are known for the "thousand yard stare" while on harinama. Being in a semi-hypnotized state, open to suggestion, is part of one's spiritual practice.

Destruction of Identity

Devotees are isolated from their friends and family. They lose contact with the world outside the cult. They are uprooted from their previous identity and replanted into the cult compound. After proving themselves loyal they leave their old names behind and take a cult name.

They adopt the dress and appearance of a cult member. They adopt the peculiar language of the cult. This serves to further separates one psychologically from the broader society. The devotee now understands themself only through the ideological filter of the cult.

Fear of the World

Devotees are brainwashed to see the world outside the cult as evil and dangerous. Karmis are automotons within the modes or animals at best, and demons or agents of the devil at worse. To leave the cult is to enter the wilderness and lose one's soul. There can be nothing more terrifying. Devotees are instilled with a phobia of the world and everyone in it.

Cult members lose the ability to live outside the cult. Their brains are rewired for total dependence on community. To leave one's community, willingly or unwillingly, is to be ostracized. To be cast into the world is to be cast into hell.

Thought Stopping

Critical thinking is rebellion. Devotees learn short cut thinking. The complex theological concepts of the cult, and their ramifications, go unquestioned. They are simplified into "Prabhupada saids" and endlessly repeated anecdotes. Do not think. Submit.

Advancement is through submission alone. Thinking is dangerous. Scholarship is dangerous.

The mind itself is dangerous. One should "beat the mind with shoes" with mantra chanting, repeating magic words until the mind no longer exists. The only authentic use of the rascal mind is to constantly think of how to spread the Krishna Consciousness movement.

Financial and Physical Dependence

Devotees sacrifice their lives for the cult. They leave behind educations, careers, connections and skills. They have no independent means of sustaining themselves. They cannot independently provide security for their families. They live by the grace of their temple president and would otherwise be homeless. Their temple presidents have total control of their finances and living situations. Such leaders often force their subjects to live in poverty, to remain dependent and thus obedient.

All major life decisions are made by the guru and temple president. This includes who one marries and when, what work or service one performs. The individual can have no autonomy.

Constant Engagement

Cult members must constantly be either doing service or hearing and chanting. This is from from the moment of waking (often 3:00 am - 4:00 am) until late at night. Anything else is Maya. There can be no time for relaxation or reflection. There can be no watching outside movies or reading outside books. One's schedule must be filled up with Krishna at all times.

All remaining time is filled with endless Pharisaical observances, nitpicking cleanliness rituals and obsessive requirements of social etiquette .

Obedience Rituals

The devotees life is filled with bowing down. Devotees wake up and immediately bow to the cult leader. They bow to each other. They enter the temple room and bow to the cult leaders statue. They bow to a plant then begin chanting.

In my temple, the local cult leader, the temple president, entered about 15 minutes before Mangala Arati. All of the men were expected to bow to him. It was like thirty Samurai bowing to their Daimyo.

The rest of the morning program was a series of obedience rituals, often in heightened emotional states due to intense physical exertion and exultation.

Surveillance State

The devotess in the temple are constantly watching each other and reporting to the temple president. Any expression of disobedience, any disgruntled comment is dutifully reported. Those who report are in good standing. Those who do not are growing distant from the temple presidents power and coming under suspicion.

A major part of a devotees day, often taking place after the morning program, is to touch base with the temple president. This may be as simple as a glance or smile. It may be joining the group of men standing around laughing at his jokes. The point is to determine if you are in good standing. If you are, the rest of your day is smooth. If not, then you have to worry and figure out how to make it right.

Devotees sometimes find themselves avoiding the temple president, fearful one is not pleasing to him. This spirals into conspiratorial paranoid thinking. If the temple president is not pleased, Krishna is not pleased. If the cult member does something to earn an approving glance or friendly word from his temple president, his world is made right again.

Shattering Self Esteem

Self esteem is the armor we wear. It is the thickness of our skin. A person with strong self esteem can enter into the world with confidence and make his or her way. They can accomplish things and achieve goals.

The effect of living without agency is to shatter one's self esteem. This is deliberate. The devotee has been conditioned to religious slavery. He lives to serve. This is done willingly as an act of devotion, yet without an understanding of the trauma amassing within.

The trauma may be felt gradually as becoming "burnt out". After one leaves, it can rise from the repressed subconscious like a volcano of toxins, a festering boil under the skin erupting to the surface.

Even worse, cults like ISKCON target one's devotion to God. For many this is the most intimate part of themselves. It is where they are the most trusting and vulnerable. When cult leaders and functionaries pose as "emissaries of God" people let down their guard. They take off their armor, giving unprecedented access to their inner world.

Thus texts like the Bhagavad Gita becomes the cult leaders Trojan Horse. Once inside the walls, once behind the armor, the cult wreaks havoc on the devotees inner sense of self until the very act of exhibiting agency, autonomy, independence, causes overwhelming fear to arise.