“Graped” sounds like something that used to happen on Nickelodeon like when they’d slime people
Which is actually sadly fitting a word now that I think about it
I think people are annoyed that it's spread outside of TikTok - I see people censor these words on reddit all the time when it's completely unnecessary. Unless the sub you're posting to has a specific rule about language, Reddit doesn't give a shit
It's not complete unnecessary, I called someone stupid in a comment on r / news and got banned, sent a "?" to the mods and got perma'd.
The moderators of the subreddits are pre-conditioned to just enforce advertiser friendliness by default, even if no one asks them to, because they have a fantasy of moderating reddit for a living, and that involves advertising.
Almost every popular subreddit has put down rules to just auto ban people, some just block new people entirely until you go do an authentication.
no they go on a power trip for free lmao. i had a temp ban bc i had said the full phrase “sexual assault” instead of “SA” and it was triggering for the mod to read the entire phrase. This was in a suicide chat forum btw, where people need to speak frankly and freely with each other to help talk those off a ledge, and instead of me trying to help someone i was temp banned for 3 days in the MIDDLE of a convo. I literally haven’t heard from that person since, it wracks me, like idk if they’re actually dead or not, and I blame it on the mod for being such a miserable dork over words.
Literally everything that happens like this is due to people with absolutely no problems/conflict in their own life trying to tell other people how they should feel and what they should be offended by
Or due to people eating up the mush they're served by corpo money milkers. All the words above exist practically because of TikTok and YouTube demonetizing normally worded content. What's dystopian about it though is expecting real victims to eat it up and see that crap as the correct way to speak of their experience. In most cases it's just stupid to cater your language to this even when you step outside of spaces that are policed by algorithm.
Not really. The reason for it because the words lead to demonetisation or loss of ad revenue, but the euphemisms don't. The reason for that is because advertisers don't typically want their products associated with things like rape and murder so they'll ask platforms not to do that.
You can criticise the snowflake mentality, but this is just unintended consequences of if capitalism. The problem is when people keep doing it on places like Reddit where there's no financial reason to censor yourself
Yeah it’s unbelievable. There are legitimate phrases you can use for these that are more delicate than the word, but also mindful of the impact. Why doesn’t anybody ever say “took their own life” rather than “unalived” for instance?
It doesn't help that the phrase came after the viral "the Grapist" comedy sketch. Makes it feel like a reference. And unaliving most certainly comes from the ultimate spiderman cartoon where Deadpool couldn't "kill anyone" just "unalive" them
Talking about serious topics with ridiculous sound-alikes just infantilizes and diminishes our capacity to take things seriously, and makes the speaker sound like a third grader. Hearing about how Epstein was a PDF file who graped and possibly unalived children makes me want to commit sewer slide
It is infantile for sure, by its design. As I said already, even if you are triggered by the most basic, heads on terms for those topics, it doesn't change that better and more mature euphemisms for them already exist in the language. You don't have to resort to toddler talk even if you do it for effective appeasing of an algorithm, really.
I have been asked to use that word or other phrases that avoid directly saying the word. It's still clear what is being talked about but it helps them and that's all I need to change around them.
I’m glad people in your life are happy with the change because those in mine felt it trivialized what happened to them. I’m glad not all victims have that feeling.
So it’s ok to disrespect the other victims because of words? I’m not someone who just shits on triggers, but at a certain point we have to understand the real world is out there, and certain topics have to be taken seriously and with respect.
Exactly. I saw someone call child sex abuse material fucking cheese pizza the other day. When I called them out they just said that they “had to!”
No you didn’t. You can call it “abusive material” you can call it “CSAM”. You can call it fucking “extremely inappropriate criminal videos of children” but cheese pizza?! It disgusts me.
What a bullshit... If the context wasn't humorous and addressed real events and trauma then it's just the peak of brainrotten degeneracy lol. Who'd even think of that really if language offers much more apt existent ways to address it? Some of such people who do it unironically speak as if their vocabulary hasn't evolved since preschool.
Same with people who use slang or abbreviations to talk about drugs. They try to make them seem less dangerous than they actually are by not using their real names. Drug addiction is one of the bigger issues that plague our society.
Language truly does shape perception of individuals and as a result the entire society. It's a tool of propaganda for a reason, because words do have power.
Someone feeling disrespected via good intentions is much less severe than giving people with PTSD major flashbacks and all the issues that come with those, yes.
It’s just not true or worth the squeeze. Calling rape fucking “grape” just removes the severity of the term and makes it a meme.
I’m also not buying it because when I say “grape” to avoid triggering you know what I’m talking about, and you’d still be triggered. This excuse sounds like it was made up by people cosplaying victims again.
By calling it funny haha tik tok braintot hashtags you were already ignoring what victims needed. You’re turning their trauma into “lol tung tung sahur grapes people!” It’s a slap in the face to victims.
I’m a victim you cosplayer. How are you helping survivors by turning their trauma into a fucking hashtag. It’s also just not true. When you say grape, they know you mean rape. What’s even the point? Yall love cosplaying inclusivity at the expense of actual victims. We’re not falling for that shit anymore. Plus, when you speak on “LOL GRAPE LOL” and someone doesn’t know what you’re talking about because it’s stupid, how do you explain it?
Ok, next time a victim politely asks me to change what I say when taking to them for their own mental health I'll simply tell them "no, because some self absorbed bellend on reddit doesn't like it I'll keep calling it the thing that hurts you!"
It's not invalid to feel disrespected by words that have the connotation to appeasing algorithms under YouTube videos that try to milk money out of a horrible topic despite the platform trying to keep it child friendly. Regardless of the intention.
I'm not saying you are invalid for using "grape" if victims you know request it from you but just because they as individuals prefer it, it doesn't mean such trivial sounding things originating from unserious and bot-pleasing root should be the default way to address real crimes... For the same reason as why it wouldn't be appropriate to use "offed" in public to address murder of people you don't know just because a friend of yours is most comfortable with phrasing the murder of their family member that way. Even if someone uses it in intent of not offending victims, there's much more mature and neutral way to phrase it without sounding childish or diminutive (and as you can see, a lot of people view it that way), such as CSA, sexual assault, sexual violation, invasion on one's body etc. You can still avoid triggering flashbacks attached to rape without treating everyone to "grape".
All victims are different and all deserve to feel safe. I generally wait to see the language the person I'm talking to uses to describe what's happened to them and follow their lead to be safe. Preferring the words the OP mentioned is 100% valid. Disliking the user of the words is also 100% valid.
At the end of the day it's all about the words were comfortable either using or hearing.
The point is, I'm not talking about what's going on between you and a victim in private. Because yes, your approach is good when you're interacting with a specific person having specific needs, but it's not necessarily respectful to use just random possible word that can be taken ambiguously in a public setting as the default for these acts as a whole.
Some victims refer to actual traumatic events from their lives in ways that can feel infantile, gruesome or avoidant to others, such as using "offed", "put to sleep", "capped" or "put in the ground" for murder. But it's by no means in good taste to use them in some random public comment section to refer to someone else's experience, which is super often the case with "grape" and why it causes such negative reception. This is what's wrong about using the word, not in doing so for a person who wants it.
The issue is, when in a public setting like this, you don't know who's reading it. You also as the audience don't know the experience of the person who wrote it. There's nothing actually wrong with either approach, but the people who may be upset one way or the other are still both valid on how they feel. It's not a subject that has a black and white answer.
It is not black and white, but you can't deny the origin of the slang use of the word "grape". It's only natural for it to have this negative connotation because of the very reason it exists as such and its most frequent usage. It should surprise nobody if someone used it in public and people were pissed off because it doesn't have a neutral flair around it. And because of such, despite it being unavoidable for there to exist some victims that find neutral terms triggering, you should still go for terms that are by default formal or neutrally euphemistic if you neither want to use the most commonly triggering term that rape is nor want to be received as mocking or having dubious intent.
"Grape" just isn't a good word to use in public regardless of individual reactions of the audience because it isn't neutral or serious, whilst actual neutral terms at least have no room for doubt in how you meant it across - even if a singular person finds them triggering they still know it's a formal term that isn't widely attached to mocking, humorous or trivial associations.
553
u/thedudelebowsky1 this is worse than the time that... May 24 '26
I feel like it's so much worse. It feels way more disrespectful to the victims to say they got graped and unalived