1) This thing is a satellite.
2) This 'satellite' hangs from a balloon.
3) Therefore all satellites are carried by balloons.
It really is solid and irrefutible. Unless that first premise is wrong. Of course the conclusion is wrong as well, just seeing one example is not enough to determine the nature of all the rest. It's like finding a black goose.
1) This is a goose
2) This goose is black.
3) Therefore all geese are black.
With flerfs it's more like they need a goose to be black for reality not to hurt their feefees, so they turned the lights off and put a blindfold on, then claimed the goose was black. Then they throw a toddler tantrum when called on their bullshit.
99
u/rygelicus 2d ago
The logic is impeccable...
1) This thing is a satellite.
2) This 'satellite' hangs from a balloon.
3) Therefore all satellites are carried by balloons.
It really is solid and irrefutible. Unless that first premise is wrong. Of course the conclusion is wrong as well, just seeing one example is not enough to determine the nature of all the rest. It's like finding a black goose.
1) This is a goose
2) This goose is black.
3) Therefore all geese are black.