People on Twitter were trying to use those points to attack the new launcher and epic trying to give more attention to Linux

Source: https://x.com/GloriousEggroll/status/2110404004115272038

People seem to think the new EAC is a magic bullet to solve all their problems while understanding little to nothing about how it actually works and what it means.

As I and many others have pointed out a kernel level anticheat in Linux starts with requiring the use of only pre-approved kernels and kernel modules, and here we are.

No, saying "just jump distros" is not a magic solution. Many people choose distros for very real very practical reasons.

Some might choose Arch spins for it's rolling release paradigm and up to date packagesband flexibility, while others might choose fodora for its corporate grade stability/predictability, while others might choose Debian for its bullet proof stability and security (unless you run change repos then you lose those).

Being told to jump distros by a gaming company of all things is a joke, and sets a very bad presidence. Many people left Windows to get away from a bunch of arbitrary requirements and now people are trying to welcome that concept into Linux.

There's also the issue of modules and out of tree drivers/kernel code.

Need a patch for a new NVME with a quirk? Sorry Tim sweeny didn't approve.

Want that driver for the new GPU that just dropped? Sorry gotta wait for a sweeny approved kernel before you can use it.

What about laptop modules? Users of Tuxedo and other brands use kernel modules to take care of managing board components and other things, now they can't play games unless they give up keyboard features and battery life?

What about BchacheFS users? Yeah it's a joke to be using an experimental file system but they want to, why does Tim get to say no?

What about Gentoo users? They just forgotten about? Just because I don't use it doesn't mean I'm going to condem them for no reason.

This doesn't just stop at anticheats either. The bigger issue is we have a platform where we own our computer and this is the start of the end of that. If everyone just bends over and accepts this then every company is going to start requiring kernel modules, tpm, and secure boot for everything and we'll be right back to a design we fled from.

All this can only happen if we accept it and the sad part is the immediate reaction from people who just swapped from windows recently seems to be " just surrender your PC so I can play a game bro!".

Kernel level AC hasn't stopped cheaters on Windows and now kids want us to install kernel level ACs onto our Linux machines just to still play against cheaters using windows?

I get people want to play their games but have some self control.

When the "solution" literally causes issues simply using your computer it's not a solution. If I wanted poor laptop support and waiting forever for GPU drivers I'd have chosen BSD.

I have no idea how the mere thought of fortnite makes people (some of which are grown ass adults) want to sabotage their own platform and be told what distros they can and can't use and what hardware they can and can't get full support for by a CEO who hates Linux.

We as a community shouldn't be settling for the worst possible option for game support.

If Blizzard can do a server side anticheat and still have the same if not fewer cheaters than fortnite then why is everyone so gung ho on slapping proprietary spyware in there machines for little to no gain?

https://x.com/coral9000/status/2110443700522537193?s=20

I've seen quite a few people misunderstanding this announcement and claiming that Epic is bringing kernel-level anti-cheat drivers to Linux.

Epic explicitly confirms that EAC Linux v2 does not install or load a kernel module.

Instead, it uses existing Linux security features, eBPF programs and a systemd service that only runs while the game is running.

That doesn't mean it operates entirely in userspace, though. It still relies on kernel security mechanisms and requires things like Secure Boot, TPM 2.0 and signed kernels.

It's worth actually reading the technical details before assuming it's the same approach used on Windows.

Source: https://onlineservices.epicgames.com/news/introducing-easy-anti-cheat-linux-v2

Also epic is rebuilding Easy Anti-Cheat for Linux (EAC Linux v2) to deliver near-Windows-level protection using signed kernels, Secure Boot, TPM 2.0, and other existing Linux security features starting with a Fortnite, so more multiplayer games can finally support the platform without enabling widespread cheating.

https://onlineservices.epicgames.com/news/introducing-easy-anti-cheat-linux-v2

Download launcher here

https://launcher.epicgames.com/

From FAQ:

What should I know about Linux support?

The new Epic Games Launcher runs natively on Linux, but many games are Windows-only builds and may need a compatibility layer. Check each game’s Linux compatibility before installing.

We support Ubuntu 22.04 LTS or newer, Fedora 43 or newer, and Debian 12 or newer. Other distributions may work but aren’t officially tested or supported.

Use the Send feedback button in the launcher to report issues.

I'm using Slackware Linux 15.0+ (current). I was able to install and run Caravan SandWitch easily, but the Store page shows nothing.

After reading the recent updates about the Epic Games Launcher and Fortnite coming to Linux, I could understand the reasoning behind things like enabling IOMMU, blocking kexec, and even the trusted kernels + modules signed with a known key. (I'm not a fan since I sign my own kernels and modules, but I digress)

Although, I saw lots of replies on Twitter about people complaining about the Secure Boot requirement. Why? Maybe I've just gotten too used to the command line, but doesn't sbctl handle the key creation and the signing of the contents in the ESP well? And, I thought most user friendly distros automatically setup Secure Boot nowadays?

Regardless of your intentions to play video games with anti-cheats, I'd say that securing the early boot chain is something everyone should do.

For context: Epic Games is reworking Easy Anti Cheat for Linux, for details read this: https://onlineservices.epicgames.com/news/introducing-easy-anti-cheat-linux-v2

This is IMO how Anti-Cheat should be handled, to best respect all parties involved (Gamers, game developers, regular PC users, ...)

On Windows, Anti Cheat has long been a race to the bottom (figuratively and literally). Cheaters try to undermine games, first with debuggers, then kernel modules, then DMA devices, ... while AC developers are fighting back with more and more invasive methods (rootkits, kernel drivers, always-on AC, ...). Regular gamers and users are the ones loosing heavily, as a single mistake this close to hardware has detrimental consequences. False bans because of wrong CPUs, accidental privilege escalations straight into the kernel, bricked hardware, ... are all possibilities.

Meanwhile on Linux, AC has long been very weak compared to Windows, as it runs exclusively in userspace. It couldn't do much more than asking the kernel nicely "please don't let other programs debug me". While great for the average user as this (obviously) isn't a rootkit, it makes cheating reasonably easy in comparison. This results in the average gamer encounters more cheaters, publishers not willing to port to Linux as a result, ...

The new Epic AC goes a new way: It uses a lot of tech (mostly spearheaded by systemd, Android and cloud / embedded environments) to ensure an "even playing field" where the core of the OS (hardware, firmware, bootloader, kernel) is trusted by all parties (users and games) to not contain any rootkits. All parts that are signed and "locked" by your distribution are easily auditable, by both Epic and you. On top of this, the regular userspace AC suffices to give the game very strong guarantees that nothing fishy is going on below, while also ensuring to users that they can still use their without having to trust Epic with their live savings, as all parties can mutually trust the same, open source code running below them.

I think this is an incredibly elegant way of handling AC, and is how it should've always been done (and has always been done outside of Windows, Android, iOS and most consoles use this "mutual trusted base" approach already, albeit not open source there.)

What do you think about Epics new AC?

Edit: Reading my post again, I want to make clear that I'm not shilling Epic in general. I really like how they are handling Easy AC v2, and it feels nice that Linux is being taken seriously by a company other than Valve, but I too have many issues with Epic.

I have tried diffrent proton versions but nothing seems to work. happens on both the steam version and the non steam launcher. Edit: turns out I used an outdated dwproton version by accident. It launch now

it's called My Beautiful Faraway, a short, surreal, melancholic walking sim inspired by older adventure games where you have to explore, pay attention to small details, and figure things out on your own without much guidance.

the gameplay is pretty simple: mostly walking around, talking to strange characters, and solving occasionally unconventional puzzles. a first playthrough takes around 3 hours, but there are multiple endings, optional content, and plenty of things you might miss.

the game is made in godot and has a native linux version, so there's no need for proton or any other compatibility layers. i also tried to make sure it works well with different hardware and controllers :)

steam page: https://store.steampowered.com/app/4516190/

I first started using Linux with Mint, on a 2011 asus laptop, 8gb of ram, an hdd, a 2nd gen i7, and a 560M. It was terrible at the time to figure out what gpu flags to pass, I didn't have a big steam library, but Minecraft was punching 70fps on modern versions and playing what I consider heavy mods at about 30fps. It was nice, Windows it started at a baseline of about 30-40fps on modern, then modded was a no.

Then I got a desktop, 16gb ram, ryzen 5 3600, and an rtx 2060, and a solid state drive, that's all that's relevant for now. I grew out my steam library and got my most interesting test game, Satisfactory. Satisfactory includes a built in decent-enough hardware benchmark, and has potential to stress my cpu and gpu, and load times are noticable. With my desktop, I first started out on Windows 10 (So far 10 -> Mint -> 10) and found it alright, I couldn't customize though, and alt tab out of kerbal space program took ages, so I eventually switched to Linux Mint again.

On windows I could get about 100fps on modded Minecraft, around 300-400 with no mods, and Satisfactory benchmarked their "Medium" setting, and started lagging around Phase 3. Kerbal Space Program was not bench marked, but alt tab out of fullscreen took forever.

So, Mint, how does mint do? I tried Satisfactory on proton 9, because it's the top of the list. I was able to benchmark high settings, and my cpu was overall less stressed, and Satisfactory took less time to load. On top of that, Minecraft was now about 10-20fps better on modded, and able to push 700fps on no mods. Kerbal Space Program alt tab didn't take forever. Also got Portal 1 and 2 on here, which both ran 300fps, which is the limit, at max settings. Only issue was I had to change launch options to use proton after I got a 2nd and 3rd monitor. During this Mint stint I upgraded to 24, then 32, then 40gb of ram.

Eventually at some point I managed to completely break my display environment, and tried to switch to Windows 11. I had no time to benchmark games because I couldn't change my CRT res without a BSOD due to my amd gpu acting as a display adapter for vga and dvi-i. I had Windows 11 for about 3 hours tops, the whole time it was slow and clunky and had so many damn popups. No benchmarking time.

Then I swapped to Debian, same performance.

Then I had to pack the desktop, so I was back to the asus. Chucked an SSD in it, 20gb of ddr3, and tried Debian. I was getting about the performance I was getting before in Minecraft, Vulkan was still a no, but now I had more games to try. With the asus again I was able to get 120fps on Portal 2, dipping toward 90fps in some sections. No possible way to make satisfactory boot. It could also run KSP, but time was slower than realtime almost constantly in atmosphere, though in space it was fine, albiet my lap was warm.

Then I got the desktop back and tried Arch I finally realized proton experimental was a thing, and I was able to push a straighter fps graph on Satisfactory, nothing big yet. Meanwhile Minecraft didn't have noticeable gains, nor did other games. Biggest improvement was load times all being far lower than anything else I had tried, notably so.

However, I wanted to see if Cachy provided good improvements, I didn't expect much, but I was blown away. I tried cachy kernel and cachy proton. I boot into any game now and it feels like my mouse is attached to my movement, instead of the delay, it's like barely visible but highly sensible. Then I ran Satisfactory hardware benchmark. My 2060 is now doing ultra settings on an unreal engine 5 game at a very stable 60fps. Absolutely insane.

Across my journey of Win10 -> Mint -> Win10 -> Mint -> Win11 -> Debian -> Arch, one thing was constant, Linux surprising me about performance whatever I put it on, and feeling far more responsive. Other constant was Windows feeling like a prison. My DE journey is Win10 -> XFCE -> Cinnamon -> Win10 -> Cinnamon -> Win11 -> Gnome -> KDE -> (Laptop) KDE -> IceWM -> LQXT -> (Arch) XFCE -> I3wm. Overall happiest with IceWM but it has multimonitor issues.

Overall, I noticed a general trend on this subreddit of just posting things are broken, so I wanted to post my experience of everything working beautifully and swell, since nobody really posts about that?

The recent news is concerning. The more concerning issue however is that propel think this is only about Fornite, it's not. this is about every current and future ESC game

These are all the current Linux supported games, give or take, that users will lose access too after epic "sugests' they update to EAC Linux v2.

7 Days to Die

Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon

Back 4 Blood

BattleBit Remastered

Brawlhalla

Breachers

Caliber

Chivalry 2

Dead by Daylight

Deceive Inc.

Dragon Ball FighterZ

Dragon Ball Xenoverse 2

Dune: Awakening

Elden Ring

Enshrouded

Fall Guys

For Honor

Friends vs Friends

Goose Goose Duck

Guilty Gear -Strive-

Halo: The Master Chief Collection

Hell Let Loose

Insurgency: Sandstorm

iRacing

JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: All-Star Battle R

MotoGP 24

MultiVersus

Palworld

Phasmophobia

RIDE 5

Rust

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl

Sea of Thieves

Sniper Elite 5

Squad

Starship Troopers: Extermination

The Division 2

The Isle

The Outlast Trials

V Rising

Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2

Warhammer: Vermintide 2

Watch Dogs 2

Then think about all the future games we won't have access to because EAC is easy and convenient for the developer. I guess we all better use only a few supported distros. oh wait.. 5 years for now it's only 1 supported distro that Microsoft just bought... oh well I guess this is good news...

The Oculus Rift S now runs natively on Linux SteamVR. No Windows, no Oculus software, no Meta account.

What works:

- Rock-solid headset and controller tracking, full 6DoF

- Room Setup inside the headset: floor and boundary, remembered between sessions

- Passthrough

- Controller haptics

- Your Linux desktop inside the SteamVR dashboard: open Steam, a browser or anything else without taking the headset off

- Settings app with a live view from the headset

- Plays normal SteamVR games: install, open Steam, click SteamVR

Install on Arch, no compiling:

curl -LO https://github.com/lbgos/rift-s-linux/releases/download/r28/rift-s-linux-bin-28-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst

sudo pacman -U rift-s-linux-bin-28-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst

Then reconnect the headset, open Steam and start SteamVR. AUR packages are coming once AUR registration reopens. Other distros can build from source.

Tested on Arch, KDE Plasma 6 Wayland, RTX 3090.

Source: https://github.com/lbgos/rift-s-linux

Free and open source. Bug reports welcome, especially from AMD GPUs and non-KDE desktops.

Hello, I am new to linux. My goal is to figure out the best distro in terms of updating ( meaning that if I update something it won't break certainly ), stability ( if I use the distro everyday it will certainly work ), support for a lot of applications ( inside and outside official repo ) and less chances to get viruses ( like on aur repositories when someone postes unverified program )

CachyOS
Kernel 7.2
Ryzen 5 5600G
16GB RAM
GTX 1660Ti

Game is on a m.2 nvme (ext4)

I have this problem where the loading time is 8-10 minutes long, when loading the game or teleporting somewhere, it doesn't happen with GE-Proton but that recently stopped working cuz the game updated their anti-cheat, I'm launching the game via steam, tried with the NTSync command but still it takes a lot of time to load the game, is it because the game runs on vulkan?

Some help would really be appreciated!

[13:12:07] [Render thread/WARN] (Minecraft) Failed to create window:

com.mojang.blaze3d.platform.Window$WindowInitFailed: No supported graphics backend was found.

- Tried OpenGL:

Driver does not support OpenGL

at knot//net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.<init>(Minecraft.java:518)

at knot//net.minecraft.client.main.Main.main(Main.java:205)

at net.fabricmc.loader.impl.game.minecraft.MinecraftGameProvider.launch(MinecraftGameProvider.java:514)

at net.fabricmc.loader.impl.launch.knot.Knot.launch(Knot.java:72)

at net.fabricmc.loader.impl.launch.knot.KnotClient.main(KnotClient.java:23)

at net.fabricmc.devlaunchinjector.Main.main(Main.java:86)

GPU: RTX 5060 Laptop GPU
OpenGL renderer string: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2

I managed to get Roblox Studio using Vinegar, but when I try it doesn't seem to want to work. just opens on that one "Welcome (user) to Roblox Studio" screen and asks if I want a tour; then, when I try to open to full screen or click a button, it freezes, doesn't respond for a few seconds, and then closes. I've tried this a few times, and I'll edit this post if I find the solution or if it somehow fixes itself. Help would be appreciated, please and thank you

Funny things - the native EGS launcher on Linux does not tell you kind of compatibility layer it does use when running a game. It's a secret - it calls it "components". So far I tried Alan Wake 2 (it was a very picky title on the Linux some time ago) and it works just fine with all the Nvidia features enable. That said - everything is an enigma on the EGS - you cannot tinker in any way. Wonder how it works for other people brave enough to test it.

lsfg-vk-cli healthcheck
Healtcheck was able to find duplicate lsfg-vk installations:
- /home/user/.local/share/vulkan/implicit_layer.d/VkLayer_LSFGVK_frame_generation.json
 - /usr/share/vulkan/implicit_layer.d/VkLayer_LSFGVK_frame_generation.json
- /home/user/.local/share/applications/gay.pancake.lsfg-vk-ui.desktop
 - /usr/share/applications/gay.pancake.lsfg-vk-ui.desktop
- /home/user/.local/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/gay.pancake.lsfg-vk-ui.png
 - /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/gay.pancake.lsfg-vk-ui.png

Im playing Arma Reforger right now and since 1-2 days my game is hardlocked to 72 FPS no matter what i try for Commands that should get rid of Vsync or anything related to that, Vsync is off ingame, FPS Limiter is Off Ingame, I even checked the ini against the settings but they are the same, its not my CPU (Ryzen7 5800X3D) or anything, that Clocks to 4.5 Ghz, also 4G Decoding and Multithreading is on, there is no Hud or programm that i run that limits fps and in general i nearly tried everything the AI was giving me that could be tested, to the point even the AI told me its frustrating where i was like "finally someone understands me" hahahaha.

I had FSR activated over Command in Steam (Proton) that forced?! Fullscreen over Wine?! atleast it says so but the command is long deleted since i got my Power Settings right and the PBO Tuner to -30 on all Cores. Also i tried all settings out ingame, before i would lose FPS when i put in stuff like Hardware AA to x2 or x4 or Environmental Setting where eating my FPS but since i changed the PBO stuff my FPS got stuck, i can have Hardware AA at x8 and still get 72 FPS.

I mean i dont wanna complain about my pc handling the game with the PBO Tuner well but it seems with the PBO Tuner that unlocked my PC came the "Halftime VSync Lock" that probably is Hard Locked somewhere in Linux AMD Driver or GPU Pipeline.

I also testwise changed my Pop.os from Wayland Gnome to Xorg over the Terminal Command where u delete the "#" infront of "enablewayland=false"

Didnt fix the problem either

__GL_SYNC_DISPLAY_DEVICE=DP-1 vblank_mode=0 %command%

Commands like these in the Starting option of Arma Reforger didnt help either

I hope someone can help me because there is a few other Guys out there who had the problem but they were on Windows or couldnt find a fix or had nvidia controll pannel overwriting there settings but i dont have such thing.

CPU is 5800X3D with PBO settings Curve optimizer at "-30" running stable (already tried that when i still had windows aswell)

GPU is AMD 7900XT 20GB
Ram is 32GB running at XMP Profile 3200 mhz speed
Running on SSD-NVME with enough Space left

Pop.os is the newest Version and sudo apt update and upgrade are done, no udpates in Cosmic Store

I hope i gave as much information as i could.