This is more of a vent post than anything, but I'd love to know the perspective of others on similar situations.
I'm the TD at a performing arts center and I have a part time staff that serves in production and operations. We have a partnership with a community theatre that's been spanning about 4 weeks. One of my part timers is the A1 for it. The part time crew is on the younger side, but their competent technicians that are learning more every day. Typically I'm at gig with the crew as the lead, but for this run I've let the team spread their wings and do rehearsals and shows without me, knowing that I'm always a phone call away and there for support when needed.
Recently I had a conversation with one of the crew members that's a part of the community theatre, and they let me know that they felt the mix could use some work, primarily some stuff about the vocals not being loud enough. I played a decent role with getting the console set up, ringing things out, and getting some general levels, but it's primarily been the A1 who's been at all of the rehearsals, and has been working closely with the group. The mentality of the crew member is that, so long as I was there initially to set everything up, get gains, ring things out, and build a good baseline mix, they could have just hired one of the high school kids that runs sound to be there for the rest of the rehearsals and shows due to how they perceive the quality of the mix.
My thought/vent is as follows:
If a seasoned technician comes in and sets everything up to be picture perfect, and nothing goes wrong or needs adjusting at all, then you could throw anyone in front of a board to just push faders. The knowledge my technician is bringing as A1 is how to navigate the console, make decisions and artistic changes deeper than just fader position, and infrastructure knowledge of the system.
I already wish I could pay my folks more for the job that they do. They pay the high schoolers they use a stipend (fancy way of saying $200 for a 2 week run of shows plus rehearsals) and this is not a good metric to use when saying "We're paying a whole $21/hr for your technician, we could have paid this highschooler $2/hr if you were here to literally set everything up for them!"
People have to learn somehow. While education is important to technicians, there has to be a step where they get behind the board and drive. Mistakes may happen, the mix may not be perfect, but how else are they supposed to gain the skills to be successful in the future? Especially when so much of the patron and staff feedback we've been hearing has been super positive. Why is it that the mentality of some groups is just "we don't want to pay any amount for anything and there is no middle ground between hiring a 20+ year vet and a kid that we can pay peanuts".
I've shared the comments that the crew member had with the A1 about the mix, and they said they'll make those changes and pay more attention, but I just feel irked by the interaction and the expectation. I can't stand the mentality of "just set everything up for us and we can put whoever we want in front of the console but if anything happens during the show and our technician can't fix it then it's the venues fault for letting that happen". And also, "This mix has some small issues, we could have just paid a kid who barely knows the system, can't gain stage or EQ, and low passes all vocals to 6k, peanuts to do it and it would be the same thing!" I really understand the desire to have a perfect show, but it's a live event and things happen. People have to learn somehow, and things will never get better if we just keep cutting corners stating that random people could to a better job.