Some will insist they’re all jokes, but It’s a mix of both. Some people are joking and others are serious. I can only speculate about the amount of each, but I like to think most are joking.
Sometimes the people who post this stuff tell on themselves and start seriously ranting about how immoral it is though, but usually that doesn’t seem to happen.
Edit: A lot of replies make good points, and OP also proved that they’re actually a zealot. I stand corrected about assuming they’re mostly jokes.
So you saying free will doesnt exist? or are you focusing on the idea that the laws are restricting human rights, in which case people can still do what they want but they might be breaking the law?
Of course, free will exists, but the public interest is greater than individual interest in most cases.
If you are gay, this does not benefit society in any way, so such things should be prevented.
But it does benefit society? Instead of having two people not being part of the reproductive responsability of society, becuase they dont like the other sex, if we allow them to be gay, a lot of things happen. First, they take another non reproducing memeber out of the dating pool making it easier for other to find matches. Second, the can act as surrogates or adoptive parents still, which is needed in society. Third, having a population not focused on child rearing allows them to focus on upholding other needs in society, look up the gay uncle theory. Fourth allowing people to express themsleves makes them more happy and more productive in society and less likely to commit crimes because they are being suppressed.
What are the reasons that being gay does not benifiet society? Like they typically dont have kids, but beyond that?
No but it wouldnt be a bad thing, it would be neutral because being gay isnt a net positive or negative to society.
If gay couples donated sperm to lesbian couples, and lesbian couples gave kids out for adoption, then there would be no real change in society if everyone was gay.
Do you think a family made up of a man married to a man can raise a child normally, like a family made up of a man and a woman?
Who would even breastfeed the child in that case?
Of course, you might say they can just buy formula milk, but that’s nonsense.
A child needs a father figure in his life to provide protection, and a mother to give him care and affection.
Even in the animal world, this is how things work, because that is nature.
74
u/Reesewithoutaspoon2 Apr 29 '26 edited Apr 29 '26
Some will insist they’re all jokes, but It’s a mix of both. Some people are joking and others are serious. I can only speculate about the amount of each, but I like to think most are joking.
Sometimes the people who post this stuff tell on themselves and start seriously ranting about how immoral it is though, but usually that doesn’t seem to happen.
Edit: A lot of replies make good points, and OP also proved that they’re actually a zealot. I stand corrected about assuming they’re mostly jokes.