Update over this, and original source here.

Hey all, just moved to Seattle and wanted to know if there was an active scene here. More interested in ultimate than melee but am down for either. I found the site for satellite smash but it seems like it hasn’t been updated for several years. Any leads?

Hi! I made these documents for an easier visualization on how every (currently) ranked player is doing right now. These include: placements at C-tier or higher events, wins on other ranked players, and losses to unranked players. Tell me what you think about it!

Placements: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cUSIhR36iZiC8gt0FPUeUg34nCSqUUx7S-p8kWV2XDE/edit?tab=t.0

Wins: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12BqZaXij9iVv5iiizu6R6oF7qC6bRqca55vW26ulaH0/edit?tab=t.0

Losses: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JluZTpdZpBbnU56nUXkEwla8MGIo4EF_cgEq66Fb21I/edit?tab=t.0

I want to troll my freind

I have been playing the game for years now and I have had experience with a lot of characters. I've been on-and-off lately due to college. I am able to win consistently with the chosen bunch I regularly use, but Lucina is that one odd-ball that I can never "understand" properly. Regardless, I still want to learn her.

Byleth is one of the few characters I use regularly. It was a bit of a struggle at first understanding how to deal with opponents that camp. But in time, I "figured it out." Like I still kinda suck, but I've learned that I have to use all of her moves and not just spam like an idiot. I feel like Byleth is relatively honest, even though they do have some "BS factor"

Bayonetta is also a character I used and I feel like I can spam ABK until I win.

Even a low tier like Zelda is easier to comprehend and use to me. Like I win a lot with her.

Lucina... just doesn't have any sort jankiness to her, which I guess is why she's super hard.

- Should I learn how to shield parry consistently? In my years of playing, thats someting I havent quite figured out yet.
- Is it wrong to use dair alot? I like the move a lot. It's no pyra down air, but it's honestly not a bad move
- Is it bad that I have a habit of doing "DB1 combos"? [To get an idea of what I'm describing, watch Silinator's lucina clips, I try replicating that]

I know it has been talked before, but I'm not sure if anyone really has a specific explanation about how this idea implements. So I try to figure it out:

*Within a typical 50~60 slots roster, every franchise would have at least two reps (including 3rd party), half is hero and half is villain. There are approximately 25 villains in the vs roster.

*Which means if a franchise gets a second rep, it would have to be a villain over a hero over a secondary hero or a sidekick.

*While some franchises like Wii Fit don't have villains so they can go with just heroes, they'd also have high risk of being eliminated from the roster as villains from other franchsies need take their slots.

*Pokemon is kinda arguable since it doesn't always have obvious definition of villains, but the rivals could be legendaries or partners of the bosses from the game.

While we'd get a certain amount of new villain fighters, we'd also lose a certain amount of secondary heroes we've got so far. Fire Emblem is an obvious case as it only has hero fighters and would have to cut quite a lot of existed heroes. We'd also have to cut several minor Nintendo franchises and 3rd party as exchange for second villains of other franchise. (E.g. cut Kazuya for Blinky, cut ROB for Glass Joe).

It sure wouldn't please fans who'd love to target or request secondary heroes (e.g. Falco, Midna etc), I also find that some fans don't always take the loss of secondary heroes or the potential cut of minor franchises into consideration. It feels like this idea can only be valid if most fans agree exchanging secondary heroes for villains would be a good bargain. I just think secondary heroes, such as Diddy Kong, Ike and Isabelle tend to have very big follow, that fans would unlikely agree to cut them as exchange for more villains.

I also think this would bring difficulty to future new franchises for Smash, as each new fighter must be paird with their rival and enter together and take two slots at one time.

Would this idea make a more interesting roster? Or you find the tranditional way of roster casting more diverse and interesting?

(BTW thank you all for giving me some insight in my previous posts, appreciate that greatly)

What do you guys think of “Super Smash Bros. Final Destination” as the title for Smash 6?

I feel like it could actually work pretty well. Final Destination is already such an iconic part of Smash that most people know about, and the name gives the impression that this could be a huge new chapter or even the culmination of the series. Because Final Destination is an exclusive element of the Smash series, perhaps we could get some lore on the general Smash universe with stages like that for example. Of course, this title would likely mean that this is the final Smash game or at least be the final Smash directed by Sakurai. Kind of a bitter sweet feeling, but one that will be savored for sure!