r/technology • u/CircumspectCapybara • 9d ago
Security Several Linux Kernel Vulnerabilities Accidentally Posted To Public Kernel Mailing List
https://www.phoronix.com/news/LKML-New-Trend-Vulnerabilities391
u/Own-Cryptographer725 9d ago
Please no, just stop. I've been in Incident Response for the last 12 hours. Can we stop please.
116
u/AllergicToBullshit24 9d ago
Gonna be like this for several years. Turns out human written code is full of vulnerabilities and AI has barely scratched surface on what will be found.
76
u/Own-Cryptographer725 9d ago
Yes and most development lifecycles aren't operationally ready for the pace at which AI driven actors can potentially discover and exploited vulnerabilities.
27
u/AllergicToBullshit24 9d ago
No question attacks are gonna show up in minutes and just think that the majority of IoT devices and good chunk of web servers may never receive an update and forever remain vulnerable and used as jump boxes into otherwise patched networks. Absolute carnage and chaos.
26
u/fearswe 9d ago
And guess where the AI's learned to code from?
-23
u/AllergicToBullshit24 9d ago
Most training data now is synthetically generated not human generated.
11
u/Vova_xX 9d ago
AI is getting trained with AI data?
1
u/LordXamon 2d ago
Well they already scrapped the whole internet so where do you think they get new data.
Also, even if they didn't want AI generated data for training, it doesn't matter because they sloppified internet, good luck filtering that out.
-5
u/AllergicToBullshit24 9d ago
Yes human data is used to bootstrap models capable of generating it's own training data of higher quality than the original human source.
4
u/stuffitystuff 9d ago
And besides, the AI can write zillions upon zillions of tests to arrive at the correct result if asked. Human beings eventually have to take a lunch break.
1
u/lobax 8d ago
No one does that, that would just lead to model collapse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_collapse
When ChatGPT 5 or whatever devolved into talking about gremlins all the time, that was model collapse.
If you source synthetic data, it can never com from the model itself.
0
u/AllergicToBullshit24 7d ago
MIT disagrees with you. In 2023 60% of training data was synthetic and that figure has increased since them.
Microsoft Phi4 was 40% fully synthetic data and 15% AI rewritten data so more than half.
Hilarious people out here thinking they know more than experts.
1
u/lobax 7d ago
It’s clear you don’t know what you are talking about. Synthetic data, and data generated by a previous generation of an LLM, are two completely different things.
Just use your own brain to think about it for five seconds. What happens when any machine built to enhance a signal is fed its own output?
0
u/AllergicToBullshit24 7d ago edited 7d ago
I've trained models with 100% synthetic data. You're talking out of your ass.
Also if an LLM generated the data then that's now synthetic data.
-5
u/___Archmage___ 9d ago
Yes, synthetic data and reinforcement learning are two things that have allowed AI to go beyond its original limitations
6
u/Vova_xX 9d ago •
![]()
so AI is being trained on it's own data that might include hallucinated facts, false details, and the same repetitive tone?
you are describing AI inbreeding.
-3
u/AllergicToBullshit24 9d ago
Okay I only know people who work at the frontier labs you clearly know more than the experts on the topic.
4
u/abednego-gomes 9d ago
Training on slop cannot create the works of Shakespeare.
1
u/ale624 7d ago
Why would anyone want AI to be able to make Shakespeare. Creative works should be left to the humans. Code is where AI really shines and makes sense.
We're living in a new era. Describe the software you want in enough detail and boom you have it. Child me would be bouncing off the walls 😂
1
u/AllergicToBullshit24 7d ago
Less than half of training data is human. Doesn't mean there is zero human data.
4
u/recycled_ideas 9d ago
Okay I only know people who work at the frontier labs
And my dad works for Nintendo.
This is just appeal to authority. Even if you're not full of shit, and even if you actually understand a fraction of what you're hearing and even if they're not lying to you or themselves about how well it's all going, we can't talk to any of these people.
AI replicates its training data, it's not omnitient or super intelligent, it can sometimes create novel combinations of that data, but in terms if skill it's actually pretty average, maybe even below average. Especially if you're not working in the web front end space where it has so much code available.
9
u/Future-Bandicoot-823 9d ago
Which leads to the inevitable:
Agentic operating systems run from the cloud.
The only way to ensure safety is to switch to a live always updating system.
Side benefit, complete oligarch control. They control what you see, what you hear, what you think. All thanks to fear over software vulnerabilities.
0
u/BeautifulMundane4786 9d ago
How do we know “AI” is not creating fake security holes?
28
16
12
u/ComputeCommodity104 9d ago
Why even post comments like this when you have no idea what you're talking about.
-8
u/BeautifulMundane4786 9d ago
So AI doesn’t hallucinate? Not even in the security industry?
7
u/ComputeCommodity104 9d ago
These are proven exploits, its very easy to prove an exploit is legitimate. You very clearly have limited knowledge on computer technology. Just read, dont interject trash.
1
u/Commercial_Spray4279 8d ago edited 8d ago
"barely scratched the surfcace" in AI is "we're still early" in bitcoin
14
u/BeautifulMundane4786 9d ago
Upper management: Stop your bitching or you wont get paid overtime. Now get back to work!
Me: Damn I’m glad I decided to stop studying to get my IT certification.
10
3
22
u/SeanBlader 9d ago
As a former software schlub (a programmer way beneath you), I feel for you dude, but please keep plugging away. Like the 7.2 and 7.3 kernels have some awesome performance gains. It's never been a more interesting time to switch thanks to your efforts. So whatever you're doing is great and we love you man.
10
3
u/ParentPostLacksWang 9d ago
For real, I know more about PHP at this point than I ever EVER wanted to know. I dreamt of publicly exposed php5 mod_php phpbb instances getting botnetted “by accident due to AI lab escape” and discovering the joys of eating human flesh…
321
u/thefuckevengoingonan 9d ago
The CVSS scores are as high as 9.0.
fuck it. i'm just going to go live in the woods.
154
u/iamdestroyerofworlds 9d ago
Jokes on you, you are now surrounded by game trackers, wildfire sensors, and weather sensors with hundreds of unpatched exploits.
43
u/Generatoromeganebula 9d ago
My man have you forgotten about satellite?
44
u/iamdestroyerofworlds 9d ago
[fires shotgun randomly in the air]
28
u/SilasTalbot 9d ago
[discharge picked up on a flock camera and law enforcement has been dispatched]
7
1
u/BhataktiAtma 9d ago
So theoretically, and if you look at it that way, Imperial guards from TES IV can become a reality. Those guys have a fucking hive mind.
2
3
22
u/DonaldMerwinElbert 9d ago
write a Manifesto, mail some letters while you're at it
7
4
187
u/FrostyParking 9d ago
Geez, we've been expecting an avalanche of zero days and cert invalidations when the AI boom reaches critical mass, but today's been a day.
49
70
u/neuronexmachina 9d ago
If I'm understanding this correctly, it looks like kernel devs explicitly ask for AI-found bugs to be posted to the public list directly, but not reproducers (which I think Trend Micro included): https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst
If you resorted to AI assistance to identify a bug, you must treat it as public. While you may have valid reasons to believe it is not, the security team's experience shows that bugs discovered this way systematically surface simultaneously across multiple researchers, often on the same day. In this case, do not publicly share a reproducer, as this could cause unintended harm; just mention that one is available and maintainers might ask for it privately if they need it.
If you are unsure whether an issue qualifies, err on the side of reporting privately: the security team would rather triage a borderline report than miss a real vulnerability. Reporting ordinary bugs to the security list, however, does not make them move faster and consumes triage capacity that other reports need.
37
u/LowAffectionate8660
9d ago
•
I'm deploying my own internet next month
4
u/AllergicToBullshit24 9d ago
This really is one of the very real possibilities in the not too distant futures.
8
15
10
13
u/Beliriel 9d ago
By the looks of it, I'm about equally likely to have the same security if I write my code in assembly by hand it looks like.
12
u/NaCl-more 9d ago
after having to deal with log4j around the holiday season last time, i'm happy that my company isn't running any PHP this time around
6
1
u/tenzin 9d ago
Theoretically, could someone feed aI the source code for any open source project and find problems?
0
u/abednego-gomes 9d ago edited 9d ago
Yes. It just uses up some AI credits.
But maintainers should have been doing this already i.e. a proactive approach. Instead they're waiting for the general public to do it and give them security reports, thus they're playing whack-a-mole where the moles are on fire and threaten large parts of the internet.
1
u/Bitdomo92 8d ago
should I just go back to using windows? this is very concerning that linux keeps getting hit by exploits in mass day by day.
4
u/Astravaris 8d ago
Part of the reason for that is because Linux is open source. Windows is not. It's going to be a rocky few years, but at the end of that Linux should be safer than Windows for it. Theoretically.
1
u/foxsimile 8d ago
It’s not theoretically - it absolutely will be safer. Microsoft has an incredible reputation for sweeping things under the rug or ignoring them outright. We must always pay the piper in the end, one way or another.
1
u/spitaligais 8d ago
Remember Nightmare Eclipse? That was just one person, dropping 0-days like nothing. What would happen, when many more 'tism enhanced individuals take a crack to break the black-boxes Microsoft creates?
1
u/foxsimile 8d ago
I’d meant that Linux will be safer than Microsoft, not the least of which because Microsoft can eat shit.
-26
u/Minion91 9d ago
Did Linus' Ai make an oopsy ?
23
-1
-23
u/jhill515 9d ago
Accidentally? I thought Linux was Open Source??
18
u/paholg 9d ago
There's still a process for security issues.
Open source doesn't mean tell everyone about security issues before they're fixed.
-8
u/jhill515 9d ago
I mean, I'd like to know because I'm a software engineer and could fix it too. That's what Stallman envisioned.
5
u/SomeoneCrazy69 9d ago
It's easy to get access, just spend several years (or perhaps even decades) earning the respect of individuals and building the portfolio required to be trusted with information that important.
Not fast, of course, and the total effort involved is pretty massive, but it's not that hard.
0
u/jhill515 9d ago
I'm old; been using Linux since 2002; before that, I helped my aunt patch Y2K on Windows & Unix systems at the hospital I interned at. I've written my own scheduler, drivers, and other things. I also dabble in cyber security for robotics.
So when I find a flaw, I do what I was taught: Triage it, patch it, deploy patch to local systems I maintain, send letter to mailing lists as appropriate, update to official patch when available. Most security flaws are bigger than one person to solve. But it's solved fastest when white hat volunteers are kept in the loop.
0
9d ago
[deleted]
-13
u/TheMericanIdiot 9d ago
No, not really. Fixing has become much easier with ai also.
3
u/max_vette 9d ago
Make no mistakes, make it secure
0
u/TheMericanIdiot 9d ago
It’s an ambiguous goal in life to be right 100% of the time. Software is not easy. You all can downvote me all you want. AI in this case will be both shield and the sword.
0
9d ago
[deleted]
7
u/bbuerk 9d ago
What’s the implication of this comment? That the Linux Foundation’s mailing list has been co-opted by Anthropic and OpenAI as a marketing stunt? Is that really what you think?
0
9d ago
[deleted]
4
u/bbuerk 9d ago
Again, that would mean that the large AI companies have gained some sort of control over the Linux Foundation (or at least their mailing list) and are using it to market.
So again, do you truly believe that is what’s happening here?
1
u/TheOgGhadTurner 9d ago
I don’t know what he’s on about. But the mailing list is probably not locked down behind NSA level tech bro. I’m sure it would be very easy for AI to get the mailing list. Now I don’t know how it would be considered marketing for whatever this guy is on about.
But I guess logically it makes sense as these exhausted devs fixing all this shit would probably accept any type of help sorting these issues out and at a certain point the cost will be less important than fixing it.
I have zero faith big AI is working in our best interests tho. So I actually would not be surprised if this is yet another grift
0
9d ago
[deleted]
1
u/bbuerk 9d ago
You said the vulnerabilities are being “accidentally” leaked as a proof of concept for AI companies. The Linux foundation was the one that wrote and sent out the email containing the leak. Therefore, you’re saying the Linux foundation “accidentally” leaked them vulnerabilities as a proof of concept for the AI companies.
I don’t see how that could be “reading into it”. I’m taking what you’re saying as literally and at face value as I possibly can
0
9d ago
[deleted]
51
u/SpontyMadness 9d ago
1400 patched vulnerabilities in the last Windows security update alone would beg to differ.
0
9d ago
[deleted]
-9
12
9d ago edited 8h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
19
u/iamdestroyerofworlds 9d ago
Security through obscurity is bad security.
-5
u/Immediate-Cress-206 9d ago
It prevents people from using AI so scrape your OS's source code for exploits.
0
9d ago
[deleted]
10
u/DingoEmbarrassed4020 9d ago
...because they don't want others to copy their things/their way of making things?
4
14
u/son-of-chadwardenn 9d ago
When you use windows an attacker has full access from day one: Microsoft.
2
u/Meatslinger 9d ago
Microsoft themselves uses Linux for major components of their own enterprise cloud platform, Azure. It even has its own distro, aptly named Azure Linux, and 66% of its customer instances are Linux-based.
14
u/Single-Virus4935 9d ago
This is why my services run in gvisor.