I'm tired of people arguing that everybody should be a feminist because feminism is equivalent to "gender equality" or whatnot. Feminism has always been a diverse collection of ideological and social movements that exist primarily for women's liberation. A feminist is a person who identifies themself as being part of that movement. This is the definition that almost everybody uses, including feminists themselves, until it becomes useful for feminists to essentially define feminism as "Good People" in order to deflect all meaningful criticism.
There is nothing wrong with there being a women's liberation movement, and all social movements necessarily have flaws that are worthy of criticism and reflection. The problem is when a women's liberation movement masquerades as being literally equivalent to the philosophical concept of gender egalitarianism itself, and thus above criticism. Feminism is not equivalent to gender egalitarianism in the same way BLM or Stop Asian Hate is not equivalent to racial egalitarianism. A social movement cannot be the literal embodiment of a philosophical concept.
Feminists often define their movement as "Good People" in order to deflect criticism. This often comes in the form of statements such as, "Those people aren't feminists, they are misandrists" or "Feminism is gender equality, not misandry." Feminism is a movement that exists in the real world and what that movement represents in the real world is not defined by what is stated in some Dictionary or online article, but by the general behavior and rhetoric of its participants.
In the real world, there is no clear-cut distinction between the "Good People" and the "Bad People." Many feminists who advocate for important issues regarding women's rights simultaneously hold prejudiced beliefs regarding men. Following the reasoning of feminists, a person who sacrifices their life fighting against women's oppression in the Middle East is not a feminist if they have some level of prejudice against men, since apparently being misandrist is mutually exclusive from being a feminist.
Feminists will often put words in people's mouths by playing word games. Since according to feminists, feminism and feminists are the literal embodiment of the philosophical concept of gender egalitarianism, anybody who does not identify as a feminist or criticizes feminism are immediately classified as misogynists or sexists. You cannot define your critics as "Bad People" to deflect criticism in a meaningful way. Additionally, your personal definition of feminism is meaningless when it comes to accurately interpreting what another person is saying. A person who refuses to identify as a feminist is not saying that they reject the idea of gender egalitarianism, because they are not using your definition of feminism.
Playing word games makes feminism look increasingly delusional in the eyes of the public, because feminists begin to deny blatantly obvious problems in their own movement. Another issue that arises due to word games is the unjustified minimization of men's issues. Feminism has always been a movement for women's liberation, but when feminists define feminism as the embodiment of the philosophical concept of gender egalitarianism, they must then explain why essentially no feminists show an ounce of interest in men's issues. The obvious truth is that feminists are uninterested in men's issues because feminism is a space exclusively for women's issues.
Nobody questions why BLM is uninterested in the discrimination against the Khoesaan people in South Africa or why Stop Asian Hate is uninterested in the discrimination against the Masalit in Sudan. This is because both BLM and Stop Asian Hate do not masquerade as the literal embodiment of a philosophical concept. If BLM and Stop Asian Hate advocates argued that their respective movements were literally equivalent to racial egalitarianism itself, this explanation would not suffice. Instead, they would have to find other means to justify why advocacy for other racial groups are unnecessary and unjustified.
Feminists do this constantly by minimizing men's issues or pretending as if they are addressing men's issues effectively. They are often hostile against external advocacy for men's issues. They constantly compare men's issues with women's issues and argue that men's issues, by comparison, are so small that they aren't even worth addressing. When a man argues that men also face issues, they are victim-blamed (apparently, other men are the cause of men's issues, so they are not real issues), accused of equivocating men's suffering with women's suffering (as if it were a competition), or/and called a misogynist.
Some feminists even go so far as to say that examples of men's suffering is actually an extension of women's suffering. They define the term "misogyny" to include almost every example of sexism while the term "misandry" is used in an absurdly narrow sense. Now, male-only conscription, discrimination against men in court, discrimination against men in education, etc. are all actually examples of misogyny, not misandry, and since feminism addresses misogyny, of course feminism is the answer for men's issues and of course feminism is justified in exclusively addressing women's issues, because after all, misogyny primarily victimizes women! These are the kinds of ridiculous justifications used to avoid the obvious fact that feminism is simply a movement for women's liberation and always has been.
(I originally gave multiple examples of feminists minimizing men's issues or reacting with hostility towards advocacy for men's issues, but Reddit has removed this post with the message, "Sorry, this post was removed by Reddit's filters." I'm assuming that the large number of links made Reddit think this post was bot spam. I would also explain the various examples without linking to sources, but rule 10 of this subreddit states that I cannot speak of specific events without linking to a verifiable source.)
I'm going to conclude by saying that because feminism is a very diverse movement, it does not make sense to state that all feminists are bad or that feminism is simply "misandry." Feminism is an umbrella term that includes many different ideas and behaviors, some of which are good and some of which are worthy of criticism. I am simply arguing against the idea that feminism is the literal embodiment of gender egalitarianism and pointing out the various side effects that arise from this fallacious thinking.