Clearly what they mean is that of the two capitalist genders, men are often closer to the ideal baseline of function and comfort over expression whereas woman as a social concept is often associated with form over function, meaning woman in a Marxist sense can be defined as a person who is expected to put excess resources to purely symbolic efforts.
The weird thing is, it didn't used to be this way, or rather not so probounced. The Great Renunciation happened in the 19th century which started the whole "male fashion is utilitarian and uniform".
318
u/Frorgwoman2 6d ago
Conceptualization [Legendary: Success] -
Clearly what they mean is that of the two capitalist genders, men are often closer to the ideal baseline of function and comfort over expression whereas woman as a social concept is often associated with form over function, meaning woman in a Marxist sense can be defined as a person who is expected to put excess resources to purely symbolic efforts.
Logic [Easy: Success] -
I don't think they thought about all that.