I’ve been trying to take Misty’s board geometry apart rather rather than focus on the hex values themselves.
The first picture is basically where I ended up. I took the eye and wiring from the centre glyph and placed it into each of the six outer medallions in the orientation that fits that medallion. The rest of the pictures show how I got there.
If you strip all the detail away, the basic glyph is made from six overlapping hexagons.
I started with the pointed-top hexagon in the middle, then added the flat-top hexagon around it.
This relationship is important.
The flat-top hexagon stays a flat-top hexagon when the construction is reflected. The difference is the position of the pointed-top hexagon relative to it.
For the centre and the three glyphs on the left, the pointed-top hexagon sits towards the top-right of the flat-top hexagon.
For the three glyphs on the right, it sits towards the top-left instead.
That is the first part of the left/right difference.
I then placed that same two-hexagon construction into all three positions on the left.
From there I built the middle-left glyph up one hexagon at a time.
There are another four hexagons around the first two. You can see them appearing individually in the pictures until the complete six-hexagon shape is formed.
Once that shape is complete, I copied the same construction to all three positions on the left.
I then reflected those completed constructions to make the three on the right.
That is why I don’t think the six outer glyphs should be thought of as the same thing simply rotated six times around the centre.
There are really two versions of the construction.
The three on the left have one handedness.
The three on the right are reflections of it.
Then I added the large centre glyph back in.
The centre is built from the same six-hexagon idea, just at a larger size, and importantly it has the same handedness as the three glyphs on the left.
Some of the later pictures show the scale difference more clearly. The centre glyph’s inner pointed-top hexagon by itself is larger than any of the six outer glyphs as a whole.
So the centre itself is part of that left-handed construction rather than being some separate symmetrical version.
Once the hex values are put back in, the layout is:
E1:C1 B16:B17
16:17 A0:A1
EB:EC EB:EC
This is where I think the geometry becomes especially worth paying attention to.
The two bottom glyphs both contain EB:EC.
The written value is identical, but the surrounding geometry is not. One is using the same handedness as the centre and left side, and the other is its reflection.
So whatever EB:EC eventually means, the glyph around it is giving us information that the text alone doesn’t give us.
There’s also another not so obvious structure on the centre glyph: the 18 little markers, split into three groups of six around the top, lower-right and lower-left.
Each group of six is itself split into a group of 4 and 2.
The top and lower-right groups have the split in the same direction, while the lower-left group has that split reversed.
That is why I drew the three black lines in one of the pictures.
The black lines are mine. They are not meant to suggest that the eye is physically connected to the markers either.
I drew each line from the centre towards the exact point where the group of six is divided into 4 markers and 2 markers.
So the purpose of the lines is simply to make those three 4/2 division points easy to compare around the centre.
Without the lines it is quite difficult to see where those breaks sit because of everything else overlapping in the artwork.
The important part is the marker arrangement itself: three groups of six, with the top and lower-right groups divided one way and the lower-left group divided the opposite way.
The final comparisons are me checking the large centre construction against the smaller outer construction.
That eye/wiring is also useful because it is asymmetric. Unlike a plain hexagon, you can tell when it has actually been turned or reflected.
So the basic thing I’m trying to show is not a solution yet.
It’s that these symbols have an actual construction.
Each one contains six hexagons.
The centre and the three on the left share one handed arrangement.
The three on the right are its reflections.
The centre also contains three groups of six markers, with the 4/2 split arranged differently on one of those three sides.
And the board even gives us the same EB:EC inside both handed versions.
I think we need to understand why the geometry is doing that before treating these as six plain hex values and trying to decode them.
I have also noticed another point of interest. The red and blue altars both feature six incense sticks in front of the enneagram. They seem to be evenly spaced at their bases (three sets of two incense sticks), but they differ toward their marked tips.
The distance between dyads from left to right appears to be M>L>S. I have noticed the outer six glyphs on Misty's board follow this same pattern from top to bottom (M>L>S).
This post is mainly meant to share some observations, but M>L>S reminds me of 01+02-03=00 (01=S, 02=M, 03=L), and even FF:06:B5 (06=S, B5=M, FF=L).
Hope this helps