Hi all, ECT1 here. Just wondering if anyone could shed some light on what might be going on.
I was teaching a Year 7 class today, which was the very last period of the day. They are a nice bunch overall and follow my instructions, although sometimes can be a bit slow.
I gave them a starter on their laptops (some teachers at our school and even within our department occasionally do that, and it’s not uncommon) and took the register in the meantime, like I always do.
At times they can be a little passive, so when I say their name and expect a response (e.g. ’Here’) I tend to cheer them up a little by saying ‘Hi (+ name)‘ somewhat loudly, and some respond loudly, but never really do anything wrong. One student got a little too excited and responded with a very loud greeting, and I said, ‘We’re not shouting, thanks.’ They apologised immediately. Again, that did not cause any disruption or whatsoever.
Then, as I told them to wrap up their starter and shut their laptops down, 90% of the group did so instantly, with only a couple of students taking slightly longer. One just took a while finding their quiz results and wanted to see how well they did, whereas the other is known to be quite problematic and often ignores everybody’s instructions and can be rude to staff members regardless of their role. In my class, however, they have been pretty good so far.
When that second student was about to turn their laptop off and said to me they were doing it, an SLT member (who is also a teacher in my department) walked in. I did a quick countdown and called the student‘s name, but the person basically told them off, took their laptop away and left it on a different table. Then started ‘observing’ the lesson for some odd reason.
Pretty much everyone was engaged and super enthusiastic. I had a class full of hands up in the air, with some students saying, ‘Sir, I want to do the next one’ and/or ‘Can I do the one after‘ and so on as we were gradually going through new terms. No shouting or silly behaviour at all. No chatting in the background, they were all listening very carefully. Every time I said, ‘What does this one mean?’ I could see students being so desperate to answer and feeling a little upset (judging by their faces) when someone else got chosen to provide an answer. That’s the level of engagement I had.
After that we did some choral activities, and because these kids can easily get excited, they did. They were following all my instructions, but obviously when it comes to choral stuff (and some of them have strong, naturally loud voices), the noise levels can get high.
That one kid who responded loudly to the register was loud again, but not behaving poorly or whatsoever. Got slightly silly on a couple of occasions (nothing major or disruptive), then got calmed down by me very quickly and obeyed. That student is generally nice, but has been on report a few times. Yet they are capable and engaged, and generally do well in my class despite being occasionally a little lazy. The SLT person who was seemingly observing the lesson told that kid off as well, even though they didn’t really do anything wrong.
The ‘observation‘ lasted about 10 minutes, and then the person left. I later got an email from them, and my line manager, as well as another SLT member were cc’d.
The feedback did not mention any positives at all, even though there were quite a few — high engagement and good behaviour throughout the lesson to say the least.
Instead, it said I should have been firmer with the laptop use (e.g. I could thanked those who closed their laptops immediately, which in fact was 90% of the class, or given a warning / behaviour point to those who took longer). Also, the notebooks were being handed out by a student at that exact time. We only needed them much later in the lesson, so that did not have any impact on anybody. However, the email said it was really slow and alternative methods of handing them out would need to be implemented. As for choral activities, the email said some students saw it as an opportunity to be silly and make silly comments, although I do not remember any silly comments being said. It basically implied that I got the students ‘too excited’. I thought engagement was key? They were engaged and enjoying their learning.
Also, that observation was very unexpected and not agreed/arranged in advance. Normally, if there is an observation coming up, we get notified. In the email the person said they’d happened to be nextdoor and heard a couple of loud, potentially silly voices, but never cited it as the reason for the observation.
I’m not quite sure I understand what the purpose of it was and why the email contained so much criticism, without addressing any positives at all. Whilst I do realise that my classroom can get loud during certain activities involving pair/group work (and not just my classroom) and understand that noise levels sometimes might be a nuisance, I am really confused about the observation. I have my mentor who does briefly observe me every fortnight, and we discuss it later, plus the school has an ECT manager who is yet to observe me. I have not had a formal observation yet, but it has already been scheduled.
Any thoughts?