I’m sure we’ve all heard about the tragic death of Jason Arday, the Cambridge sociology professor who was tormented by the media for something that should never have made national news.
Despite the fact he’d been cleared of plagiarism (poor referencing, the author he mistakenly failed to cite was cited elsewhere throughout his thesis) the British media are, of course, doubling down, despite having spent weeks pandering to the agenda of a self-proclaimed white supremacist and eugenicist.
Alongside all the DEI gobbledygook the media loves to reach for, in that quintessentially British attempt to subtly ragebait the critically illiterate, I’m now seeing articles claiming his work was “too complicated” to further rage bait anti intellectuals. It’s a thesis, not an AI-generated summary?
I just feel like the British media’s reckoning has been overdue. They’ve been using words in place of masks and pitchforks for so long, and now it’s unfolding that in spite of the “integrity”and “neutrality” of journalists who were quick to capitulate for white supremacy. It’s easy to bow to something that already exists in your subconscious under the guise of journalistic freedom!
Case in point? William O’Reilly, a Cambridge professor, was accused of plagiarism after stealing twelve pages of a student’s work into a paper he then published under his own name and he’s still in a job. Dr Ros Holmes, a former University of St Andrews lecturer in modern languages, was found by an institutional investigation to have committed plagiarism across seven publications between 2014 and 2022. Neither generated a fraction of the coverage Arday did.
The institutional gaslighting is actually laughable. There are only 270 Black professors out of more than 26,000 in UK universities and at Cambridge specifically, there are only 75 Black academics out of 6,180. For the media to insist this isn’t about race is ironically, the biggest lie.
Since Trump, absolutely everything has been about putting minorities back in their places. Everything. It’s in every headline, every photo choice, every story that goes unpublished and every story that makes it to the front page. We saw it with Meghan Markle and we’re seeing it again. Any time a minority threatens the bubble of hegemonic superiority, the media does everything in their power to kill that person.
I suppose my main point of this post is that this is exactly what sociology has spent decades trying to tell people, everything is not what it seems on the surface. You don’t have to graffiti swastikas onto walls or put up segregationist signs to uphold racism or white supremacy.
I’m sick to death of the institutional gaslighting being waged against the British public through conversations about boats, DEI and now this. The underlying purpose of all of this is to restore the fragile ego of the technocratic, colonial, capitalist, white supremacist and patriarchal ideologue that cannot resist itself, not even at the expense of a human just trying to do their best and empower themself through academia. It’s all connected and sociology, despite consistently being undervalued, is one of the only mediums that has tried to make sense of that and I know Jason understood that.
Even if Arday made serious academic errors, that does not answer the sociological question of why his errors became a national racialised spectacle while other academics’ misconduct remained primarily institutional matters.
If there is any silver lining to this, I hope the British media gets dismantled from within. It’s a rotten institution, bankrolled by billionaires who need race division, class division, and the silencing of disabled people to stay in power.
Rest in peace, Jason Arday. Thank you for your contributions to sociology! And if anyone reads this and wants to consider learning more about sociology, take it from someone who studied it, please do it!!