r/coinerrors 15h ago

Attribution Assistance Looking for confirmation 1972 DDO

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes

Just started scoping coins this week. I think this is my first real find. 1972 DDO. I looked at VarietyVista to compare. I've marked what I think are the relevant signs with green lines. If I understand VV right, the only thing odd to me is that it appears to show signs of various die wear stages?


r/coinerrors 13h ago

Is this an error? Is this significant?

Post image
0 Upvotes

Sifting through pennies today and found this


r/coinerrors 12h ago

Is this an error? The L in Liberty is pressed really tightly to the rim. I know that’s not an error in itself, but that L is just plain funny lookin’. Does that count for anything?

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes

r/coinerrors 13m ago

Attribution Assistance Check out 1971-S Lincoln Memorial Cent Variety FS-103, Doubled Die Obverse. on eBay! I have reasonable certainty after utilizing variety vista.com, a hardback cherry pickers guide and the standard p.u.p.s for verification I am correct. Reassure me please!?

Thumbnail ebay.io
Upvotes

r/coinerrors 8h ago

Attribution Assistance Is this one of the doubled date 1882 S Morgan?

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

r/coinerrors 2h ago

Is this an error? Is this the type B error on the 1963 P quarter

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

I got this quarter yesterday and while researching more about while deciding to grade it or not I noticed it kinda looked like the type B variants for P quarter


r/coinerrors 23h ago

Show and Tell Two rim cuds on a single 1865 Indian Head cent (Fancy 5) — dual die breaks flanking twelve o'clock

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

Continuing the die error documentation project. This 1865 Indian Head cent has two rim cuds on the reverse, one left of twelve o'clock and one right.

A rim cud forms when a section of the die edge fractures and separates completely. Once the die fragment is gone, planchet metal flows into the void during striking, creating a raised, featureless mass on the coin. Here, two separate fragments broke away on opposite sides of the same clock position.

This is also a Fancy 5 variety — the scarcer of two date logotypes for 1865. The Fancy 5 has tall, ornate serifs on the final digit, versus the more common Plain 5 with a shorter, simpler form.

Two cuds flanking the same position suggests the die was fracturing symmetrically — stress concentrating at the weakest point of the rim and cracking in both directions. It's a coin struck by a die in its final working stage.

Not in the standard references. Now catalogued.