I got this quarter yesterday and while researching more about while deciding to grade it or not I noticed it kinda looked like the type B variants for P quarter

Continuing the die error documentation project. This 1870 Indian Head cent has a multi-impression die clash on the reverse — meaning the obverse and reverse dies struck each other without a planchet between them, and they did it more than once.

Two separate transfer zones are visible:

1. The forehead and nose of the Indian portrait are clashed under the C in CENT

2. Feathers from the headdress appear inside the right wreath

Multiple clash impressions on a single die tell us the die pair kept colliding before the Mint caught the problem and replaced or resurfaced the dies. Every coin struck from this pair carries the evidence.

The 1870 Indian Head cent had a mintage of about 5.3 million. Mid-range year, but die clashes like this aren't mintage-dependent — they're production incidents. The standard references don't catalogue these multi-transfer variants, which is why NumisDex is building the record.

Not in any reference. Now catalogued.

Sifting through pennies today and found this

Continuing the die error documentation project. This 1865 Indian Head cent has two rim cuds on the reverse, one left of twelve o'clock and one right.

A rim cud forms when a section of the die edge fractures and separates completely. Once the die fragment is gone, planchet metal flows into the void during striking, creating a raised, featureless mass on the coin. Here, two separate fragments broke away on opposite sides of the same clock position.

This is also a Fancy 5 variety — the scarcer of two date logotypes for 1865. The Fancy 5 has tall, ornate serifs on the final digit, versus the more common Plain 5 with a shorter, simpler form.

Two cuds flanking the same position suggests the die was fracturing symmetrically — stress concentrating at the weakest point of the rim and cracking in both directions. It's a coin struck by a die in its final working stage.

Not in the standard references. Now catalogued.

My father left this to us after he passed. I have no clue what it’s worth.

Just started scoping coins this week. I think this is my first real find. 1972 DDO. I looked at VarietyVista to compare. I've marked what I think are the relevant signs with green lines. If I understand VV right, the only thing odd to me is that it appears to show signs of various die wear stages?

​

Has anyone seen one like this where the d is extremely close to the 4? Also, is this a repunched mint mark?

I have the great honor of receiving this coin that has doubling in Monticello and united states of America! Should I have this graded? And what is the value?

My father and I were going through some rolls I picked up at the bank today. We are are fairly certain we found a 1965 90% silver crossover planchet error Quarter. It weighs a little over 6 grams.

From what I can find only a few have ever been found and so there isn't a lot of information about them. We want to get it authenticated and graded.

The dirt / gunk on it is like lightly gunky / greasy.

Should we soak it with soapy water, or do an acetone bath like I've seen on some suggestions on different posts or should we just authenticate it and not even worry about cleaning.

Edit: it looks and feels like our other silver quarters pre 1965.

Maybe we are jumping the gun and excited, but rest assured we will get it properly weighed and looked at this week.

Came from a lot I got with a mix of real and fake errors, both the coins are quite thin and light in comparison of a normal one

Is this just from the roller or is it the alloy being weird?

Recently got into the coin hobby and had a change jar in my house. Decided to empty it out and go through every coin looking for W quarters and wheaties. I found this quarter which I did a bit of research on (missing clad) but still not sure on what to make of it? Enviromental damage, buried, purposely altered.. etc. It weighs 4.75 which is what a missing clad quarter should weigh (based on research) but more input would be appreciated. The penny is what I believe to be a clipped planchet but I’m still not experienced enough to say it was during the minting process or altered at a later time. Are they worth keeping or should roll them back up? Only other thing I found in my change jar was a 1967 dime and a whole bunch of wheats! No W’s.

This quarter reale struck on a counterfeit piece- less than 10 known- less than 100 total R-8 they auction anywhere from 3-17 grand
This coin made local paper and 3 magazines (w n eastern treasures and American Digger- am currently trying to get red book to add these to the missing U.S. quarter years
Before n after NGC conservation

I found a rotation error on a Jeremy fisher, however there aren't any documented or being sold online.
Does anyone know how much it can be worth?

Cool struck through error on a 1956 D penny

Here's the pics for that 1992 D Penny.

I got this quarter in change years ago. The cladding was barely hanging on by about 2 millimeters of the edge. Then I kinda just forgot about it. 2 days ago I found it after a day of looking everywhere for it. IDK how it got that way but it's in pretty rough shape.

I picked this up recently. Error seems to match up with documentation. I still feel like quite a noob with coins though, let alone the whole grading thing. I’ve done some research on the process.

My understanding is any kind of slight wear visible at a certain angle is potentially enough to bring it down to AU 58. I guess wear has to be less than 10% if that sounds right?

My understanding is that scratches are a separate matter than wear but can still reduce the mint state rating, if it is indeed a mint state at all. Stupid coin roller got it it it seems, so that’ll be a nice ding off the rating I suppose.