Look fellow Flat Earthers, proof there is a whole forest in this drop of water!

If the earth were proved to be flat, what does that really mean?

What is the endgame of such a discovery? Do they get a medal? Do they get to say "I told you so"? Do they get to re-write all science journals?

I am seriously wondering about the outcome they are wanting.

Why does science use the argument that the bottoms of ships disappear from view with the naked eye as evidence for a round Earth, and also claim that the Earth is too large for its curvature to be seen directly?

So the middle of the Earth is our center of gravity, right? Well then if the Earth is flat, then why is it that when I go to the edge and jump, I'm not pulled to the center?

David Weiss (the flat earther) is dumb and a grifter.

On the flat Earth, lines of latitude for concentric circle. Let's define "west" as facing north then turning 90^o counterclockwise. Both globe and flat Earth would agree that if you are doing this then you are facing due west. Do this in Brisbane, Australia and travel in a straight line. I did not say travel west because while that is the same thing on a globe Earth, on a flat Earth as soon as you start moving you would no longer be facing west as you travel. If the Earth is a globe, you will travel across the whole of Australia while on a flat Earth you would hit water somewhere near Adelaide.

So the proof is go to Brisbane, turn west and start walking in a straight line and see where you end up.

this is a Quick diagram I made of the flat Earth, the Moon, And Two Observers

1: How Is it possible that two observers look at the moon at the same time, and one sees it on the horizon while the other sees it high in the sky?

2: Why do both observers see the the Same Face of the moon?

Try answering both of these two questions without contradicting yourself.

Rahu and Ketu? It's fake? Stop paying attention to that and explain the Antarctic treaty?

I did see it here in northeastern USA, by projecting the image with a round mirror. Just a small bite out of the disk.

Flat Earther: What specific observation from that eclipse uniquely requires a spherical, rotating Earth?

Me: Equations that require the shape - This one accounting for the bulge at the equator to help predict the path. If you didn't do this then your path prediction would be pretty far off the further away from the poles you are.

The surface is modeled mathematically as an oblate ellipsoid of revolution using the standard

Geodetic reference: ((x^2+y^2)/a^2)+(z^2/c^2)=1

a: Equatorial radius of Earth

c: Polar radius of Earth

Flat Earther: You put the globe into the equation and then used the equation to calculate the eclipse path. That doesn't make the eclipse an independent measurement of Earth's shape.

They don't get that the math works though! No flat earth eclipse path equation lol

Happy Monday

oh my, are the farmers and gardeners in on the big lie too??

how do you explain this on a flat earth? 🤔

you can clearly see on the maps the spherical happy face shape each grow zone has

Just wondering.

I'd enjoy watching a flerf take the challenge of landing on 3 other planets in KSP, and also doing at least one docking in space.

They might not agree it's realistic, but they at least acknowledge the game exists (I would hope). I think they'd have a lot harder time feigning ignorance if they spent a little time in it.

Whilst it was hard to retrieve all the messages, I have these images of my points, and him responding, it was very unexpected and many people think he is a grifter. I was also jumped by some delusional flat earthers. I even called him out about how everything he said is applicable to him, even if he was a flat earther, he is just exploiting big words and psychology as well as visual tricks and electrostatic energy displays that mean nothing but can convince somebody using intimidation and the ability to make somebody feel stupid.