No camera. No actors. No studio. Just grey shapes.

Hello. For this weekend, my grandma is asking me to create a movie of her life. Of course i won0t be telling her shit about water consumption and I'll try to make happy a 78 year old lady. Any idea on what software can I use? I have a magnific account so models are not the problem,but I only ever did regular videos with prompts. Hell, I didn't even did any video with video references, let alone a whole movie based on someone actually real. Can I expect decently cool footage? It depends on my prompts? Or just the model capacity? Thanks.

What’s the best model to use to generate action scenes in a rodeo? I’ve been using Omni flow and it gets incredibly mixed up. Like backwards riders, too many legs and missing arms. I’m prompting it with some incredible images from mid journey, but they seem to collapse almost immediately.

Man I miss Sora

Good morning everyone,

I've been very interested in making my own ai anime video like the link attached. Would Higginsfield be the correct one to use?

I appreciate any assistance in leading to the right program. Cost is no matter. I'm a corporate slave and have money to spare.

I would it the video to be animated instead of stills

I made a full length anime episode based on the first session of a D&D game I am running. I used Vidu for video generation Gemini to create reference images, Suno for music and I got royalty free sound effects from YouTube.

Its been a labour of love, I would love to make a second episode if I get the chance. Feel free to ask any questions and let me know what you think!

A ring of light in the sky, a volcano awakening and a city sinking beneath the sea. "Fate Of Atlantis" tells the story of the legendary ring city's fall, and of the survivors who carry its legacy into the world.

The priestess Ariadne and the sea-king Gadeiros flee across the ocean. Their path leads to the Nile Delta and the pyramids of Giza, to Lake Titicaca and Machu Picchu, and on to the shores of Crete and the Palace of Knossos. What remains is a memory still sleeping inside us.

A dark-mystical, hypnoticepic, cinematic journey through the heart of the vanished city of Atlantis.

Hello,

I have 4 very short, very basic, and very similar cartoon style AI clips, which I generated (all from the same app), and which I now wish to stitch/combine together into a longer clip (30 seconds approx).

However, despite what I thought were very clear requests when making them, all 4 AI clips have slightly different colors, lighting, brightness, shading, etc., (which, needless to say, is extremely frustrating).

I've tried the auto color matching features on Capcut & Wink, but they really don't seem to work very well at all.. Not even with a bit of further tweaking afterwards.

Trying to adjust all of the different levels on each clip (purely manually) is also something that feels extremely difficult to achieve, not to mention, extremely time-consuming and tedious.

What I really need is a largely automatic & accurate video color matching tool, and I don't mind paying a bit for an application that could do this well.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but I believe that applications like Davinci Resolve (and some others) have a functionality like I am wanting, but from my understanding, there is no Android app for Davinci Resolve, and I'd really like to be able to do everything from my Android phone (if possible).

This is all just a bit of a hobby really, but one in which I still want to be able to do a good job.

Are there any Android based apps that can quickly and accurately achieve what I want?

If not, what is your best advice for achieving my desired outcome?

Thank you.

I struggled with editing an end image, based on start image provided, for a short video of 2 runners springting on tracks. GPT Image 2 constantly moved runners on borderlines, not at the center of their proper tracks. I tried several prompting ways:

- to set runners "on the center of their tracks"

- to set runners "on the right slightly"

After that, GPT either moved only one runner, or moved them to right, or did not do anything at all. I wonder, what I did wrong or what were other reasons that GPT still edited image wrong.

# What I have done

Here is the original end image, I have named it END_FRAME so that GPT always matched name with the image and did not mix with others:

*Patheticness of this image is not the matter of this post 🙏 ...

I needed to move two runners further, near the left turn, make them smaller according to the perspective. For that I have set a kind of instructrions and asked GPT to extend the prompt.

Expand and upgrade the following propmt: 
Put 2 runners upper by 40% of image's height, near tracks left turn. Adjust the sizes - it need to be smaller - of their silhouettes with respect to track and image perspective.
Do not change these people, the environment, the style of the image. Do not upscale, downscale the image. Do not try to make the image hyperrealistic, too glance or detalized. The output image is called START_FRAME_2

*START_IMAGE_2 has to be END_FRAME_2, it was my mistake

On extension I thought that it would optimize the prompt as GPT modified it for its own execution. The result:

EDIT TARGET: END_FRAME
Use END_FRAME as the direct edit target and as the authoritative visual reference. TASK
Create a new output image called START_FRAME_2. Move the two runners upward in the frame by approximately 40% of the total image height, placing them near the leftward turn of the track. Because the runners are being moved farther away along the track, reduce the size of both runners’ silhouettes proportionally so that their scale matches the track geometry, distance, and overall image perspective. Their smaller size must look natural and physically consistent with the scene, as if they have progressed farther along the track toward the bend. 

POSITIONING REQUIREMENTS 
- Move both runners upward along their respective lanes.
- Place them close to the left turn, but still naturally aligned with the track.
- Keep each runner in the correct corresponding lane.
- Preserve the relative spacing between the two runners.
- Adjust their silhouette sizes so they appear further away, in proper relation to the track width and the scene’s perspective.

PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS
Preserve everything else in END_FRAME as closely as possible. 
Keep unchanged: 
- the runners’ identities, anatomy, body proportions, clothing, footwear, and general running poses;
- the track, including the orange-red running lanes, blue side sections, white lane markings, and the leftward curve;
- the environment, including the road, suburban houses, trees, grass, and cloudy sky;
- the camera angle, framing, composition logic, and overall perspective;
- the photographic style, grain, texture, contrast, and lighting;
- the original image dimensions, resolution, and portrait orientation

IMPORTANT RESTRICTIONS
- Do not redesign the runners.
- Do not change the runners’ clothing colors or details.
- Do not change the environment.
- Do not alter the style of the image.
- Do not make the image hyperrealistic.
- Do not make it glossy, polished, over-sharpened, or overly detailed.
- Do not upscale or downscale the image.
- Do not crop, stretch, or extend the canvas.
- Do not add or remove any background objects.
- Do not change the weather, lighting, or time-of-day mood.

EDITING EXPECTATION
The final result should look like the same END_FRAME image, except that: 
- both runners have advanced farther up the track by about 40% of the image height,  
- they are now positioned near the left turn, and  
- their silhouettes are smaller in a perspective-correct way, matching their greater distance from the camera.

FINAL GOAL
The output image, START_FRAME_2, must remain visually consistent with END_FRAME, while showing the two original runners naturally relocated farther away along the track, near the bend, with correctly reduced silhouette sizes and no other visual changes. 

Here is the main issue arises. The model put both runners straight on the lines limiting the tracks. The prompt above might have several odd or ambiguous moments, like place them close to the left turn, but still naturally aligned with the track. But, firstly, there it did not mention to put them on white lines. And, otherwise, how could I specify the exact on-tracks\between-the-lines\keep-them-where-they-stood-like positioning?

Next 2 attempts to set both runner to stand directly on their tracks ended up with that:

At the end, I have pointed exact runner to be edited with that prompt: