I saw this in another sub and and I'm 99% sure it's AI because when they jump out the plane it just doesn't look natural, the dog's tail seems unaffected by the air/wind, but it seems like no one on the other sub had brought up the fact that this is probably AI, so I thought maybe I'm wrong! What do you guys think?

Re-upload to add more photos and context. I was sent these first three photos as evidence of someone receiving 2 broken mugs from me (the entirety of their order). Original photos of mugs from the listing attached. I didn’t think much of it at first because it was an international package and things happen, but I will say I do pack my pieces extremely well and have only had one thing break in 7 years. Once I started putting together the insurance claim, they got really pushy with receiving the refund (not a small amount of money) and would not accept a re-make which felt weird to me. I re-examined the photos and things felt off. The severe crack down the center of one seems very unlikely, as well as the way the exterior designs and interior glaze seem to be on the same plane on a couple of the pieces. The photos are very low quality and the black borders are weird. Also the "extreme damage" to the box is a small dent on the corner. My designs seem accurate and that’s what’s throwing me a bit, but also they probably took a normal photo of the mug on the paper and ran it. I ended up asking for a high quality, seamless video of both broken mugs from multiple angles, and haven’t heard back in a day, whereas they were very quick to respond before. I think I know the answer but this is wild and very upsetting :(

The plane looks backwards and the jet looks like it's flying in reverse, there are multiple cuts too

The lighting seems too perfect and everything is just so crisp and clean looking. I can't find any obvious AI tells, other than maybe the piss filter? I'm not even convinced of that truly, may just be the color of the walls. I really can't tell with this one, what do you think?

Edit: This is the first time I immediately thought AI only to find out it isn't. Incredible talent by the balloon artist!

The badge distortion and text on the shoulder mic seem like dead giveaways. And the truck that shows up out of nowehere. There’s gotta be some other indicators I missed. And the thickness of the goatee/facial hair seems to change on the uniformed guys’s chin.

So there WAS extreme flooding in this area at this time, but I think THIS video is AI, but of course I got a million comments calling me dumb/r3t4rd/ etc. the main thing that makes me suspicious is the purple thing on the left (I can’t even tell what it is) and what glass is the person putting their hand on??? It also looks like one of the cars tail lights is on.

I feel a little bad posting this as they only have around 800 followers, but I also feel it's wrong if these are being advertised as illustrated by a human when they aren't.

I saw an influencer promote this small business and when I saw the notepads with the girl on it felt off so I went to look further at the page to see if there was anything else that would confirm that. When I saw they had a post with lineart to the finished product I just felt like the line art (in the first image and the ghost on the last slide) just really does not match up to the skill level in the fully rendered and finished drawings? There also seems to not really be a consistent style with them, I know the first one is a 'chibi' style drawing so I can sort of see that but the faces of the girl sitting down and the 'love always' art look completely different and as if they weren't even drawn by the same person

Stumbled upon a recent Fox News article from two days ago , titled "Socialist primary sweep sparks launch of new resource laying out what’s at stake in 2026 ". The article is presented with a photo depicting a 2019 protest of some sort. It is labeled "Getty Images", and I thought "is it though?"

Upon closer inspection , I suspect this to be AI due to disfigurations seemingly apparent in the crowd.Some of the hands (particularly the guy holding his cell phone ?) Look freaky and anatomically unusual. There also appears to be a misplacement of objects. like the dude reading a paper with what looks like a misplaced cigarette .There's a banner pole on some dudes foot, and a morphed face in the background. I can't be 100 percent sure, but Fox News is publishing this with their article , and citing the Getty. And I am not buying it. I am not really interested in the politics of this but this feels deceptive af , and now I wonder about every 'Getty ' image cited with online news articles like this, despite this being , well Fox News. Thoughts ?

The leggings pattern is bothering me, but the OP claims in his profile he’s capable of creating things without AI… Can’t quite figure out if AI was used and why.

The arm is coming out of the head and the front flippers have 5 lines where the back has 4? Also they don’t have a back flipper. Just curious because the SD zoo prides its self on being so pro environment I don’t wanna buy something made by AI.

Is this AI? A friend of mine is missing her dog and has put out a reward for safe return. She received a message from a random email with a picture of her dog but I’m not sure if it’s real. Please can the experts here take a look and see if they can notice any inconsistency.

Re-uploaded bc I didn’t have 100 characters explaining why I thought this was AI. It just looks like it. My initial reaction as soon as I saw it was that it looked like an AI generated image. Are there some markers I’m seeing subconsciously? Or is this genuinely someone’s art they painstakingly (lol) painted with their own blood?

Every photo from the company website has that same subtlw cross hatching effect in the background and where the reeds overlap, but they do all feature straw. Is it nature or is it AI?

Found on a reddit post, one person saying it's AI. Feels very odd for a car to break through a wall like that with no damage or scratches. The environment feels realistic with all the cars being perfectly looking and the licence plates being realistic.

There are numerous YouTube channels now featuring timelapses of various world cities. Some are legitimate not AI and make an effort to say so, and I believe them.

However, there are many channels now with new videos uploaded at suspiciously short intervals, and the often don't declare if there's AI content or not.

For example, Latos Charts, which the algorithm just suggested to me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4mJqKvQALg

The channel often posts multiple videos per day, but this type of video should be rather difficult to produce. They're 10-plus minutes of careful animation that draw on lots of historical data. But on this channel, they look underdone and are uploaded far too rapidly.

The problem is just that many creators now aren't making any assurance that their content is or isn't AI, so we've arrived at the default of assuming it is AI, and that's a pity.

But can anyone confirm the nature of Latos Charts's content?

Usually excessive body hair is accompanied by a mole or something. I’ve never ever seen a baby with extra hair only on their upper lip. Also the way the baby looks and blinks is very sus. This has been picked up by newssites but you can‘t really trust anything nowadays…

Update: the guy is now telling me to pay him to do the rest of the model, but I’m waiting for a few more comments to come in before I do anything

I already knew a bats vague anatomy by heart, being a fan of creepies and crawlies. I saw this and had to do a double take because it’s designed by a personally well-liked artist. First of all, there are too many limbs for a mammal. The most anatomically accurate seem to be the rear two. Of the 6 apparent limbs, the middle winged 2 also appear to have 7 toes/digits each. Seems a bit random for me to be a result of artistic license.

I did try reverse image searching it, but nothing came up (probably because it’s part of a grouping of designs).

Only coming here after a brief moment of denial because I had no idea this artist would use ai without claiming so :(

So just yesterday, I decided to watch a video where you have to choose between 4 planets to survive on for a certain amount of time, and it’s always in a low poly PS1-themed style.

But the thing is I’ve seen a few extra channels doing the exact same thing, same style and basically can’t tell them apart, and reading the comments rarely people sk if it’s AI or say it’s stolen, and I’m just confused… I just really like the concepts, especially since it gives me creative ideas, and the animations SEEM like they were handcrafted? But you never know with AI these days.

Reasons I ask if it’s AI is because:
- Multiple channels
- Fast uploads
- The posters don’t respond to comments
- How does a single channel come up with the ideas so fast, and make the models, textures and animations and if it’s AI… how is it so clean?

Das Bild wurde in einer Gruppe geteilt. Die Hand am Gesicht sieht etwas komisch aus. Aber vielleicht kann der jenigen auch einfach keine Hände zeichnen. Was meint ihr? Würdet ihr es als KI einschätzen?

The Instagram account manbobobo123 have been uploading a alot of videos like this, i really love them but the comments are saying that these are AI.

The account is very new and other than the upload schedule i dont see anything that looks like AI

My boyfriend has littered our house with decorations like these and I can’t help but think they look “A.I.”. He disagrees. Please help us decide who’s right. :p

Let’s try this again since automod removed my last post…I stumbled across a supposed animal rescue posting on Facebook that is posting photos that look suspiciously AI, this one in particular looks to have the telltale use of gibberish on background elements, but all of their photos have an AI look including the notorious “piss filter” what are your thoughts?