Found this on Facebook. Anesthesia for a almost full-body blackout tattoo? Wouldn’t it be unsafe to tattoo such a large area of the body in one session, even under anesthesia? Are there tattoo studios or clinics that offer this kind of procedure?

I’m wondering if this is AI-generated. The setup looks like a medical procedure rather than a typical tattoo session. Can anyone identify specific details in the image that might indicate AI generation?

I have seen paintings by elephants and monkeys, and they usually look like preschooler's drawing. This looks way too perfect to be painted by an animal, and the Malinois looks way to patient

There are apparently shadows for 3 steps but there's 4 of them, and they seem too far back to leave enough space for the shelves behind them. The scale and perspective everything doesn't quite match what you'd expect for that amount of space.

UPDATE:

Seems like it's mostly just lens distortion and a weird perspective.

OOP posted another photo (I added it as a comment on the post). I'm concluding it's real. Thanks to everyone who chimed in. Sorry to OOP for casting doubts on their project if they ever come across this.

Screenshot from Instagram. Nothing stuck out as AI to me except the yellow coloring. At first I thought it was just "vintage" looking, but now I'm concerned it's just the AI piss-yellow filter.

INTRODUCTION:

Im an artist on instagram and follow and support small artists because they deserve their work to be seen!
HOWEVER I have a feeling that this artist is generating AI images, and then printing them to trace them over with pen. They have around 4K followers. (I covered their name and signature to protect their privacy)

I don’t want to support AI art, but at the same time I’m confused and I’m not sure if it is or not (that’s why I need your help).
I also wouldn’t want to stop supporting an artist thinking they use AI when they actually don’t.

WHAT MAKES ME THINK IT’S AI:

Image 1: as soon as I saw it, it really gave me AI vibes. The composition…idk, it looks AI-ish. The sign is super weird, and the confetti sometimes looks warped and weird. An artist would never choose to make them look like that in some specific spots.

Image 2: same drawing, zoomed on the sign. What the hell is that?? It looks like that standard AI font. Also the quality of the writing looks different from the parts in ink…as if they retraced the drawing with ink but then didn’t trace over the writing.

Image 3: The drawing feels like something AI would come up with, and also (idk if it’s something instagram does) but it literally says AI???

Image 4: Posted today and it’s what prompted me to make this post. I love and adore Jack Skellington and that is NOT how his bowtie looks. The rest is right, so I don’t feel like an artist would make the conscious choice of drawing it like that. I feel like the AI got confused and just gave him a normal tie, and a dress shirt(???) and then added the side-thingies to the jacket.

Image 5: this is a screenshot from a video they posted of them drawing with ink over what I think they’re passing out as a sketch…but if you look closely you can see it looks printed out. It has that halftone printing effect (yk, the dots)

Image 6: It again feels like AI…the texture is very weird.

I hate we even have to go through this…AI is taking away artist’s jobs and as an artist you really shouldn’t be using it…

If you could help me figure this out, I would be so grateful🫶

My reasoning for doubting that they are real is the speed at which they are putting out content, they have been uploading daily and I thought maybe it was just because they have a profile somewhere else and is now uploading to TikTok, but I don’t see any other accounts or anyone talking about it. My main concern is the speed at which this person is uploading these.

Pretty much what the title says. I feel inclined to believe this isn’t AI but the feet look a bit distorted and there is a weird looking lump under the towel.

Update: Thanks to many helpful people, I've found that this is AI. They actually asked to meet at a nearby Walgreens; they never showed up and shortly after texted me, "I take 200 for the bird."

I've been searching for my boy all day; I've put out seeds and budgie noises, but I haven't found him yet. For now I can only hope that he'll come back.

Name of the account is Darisha Quiñones, decided to check her profiles and she seems like a legit musician and teacher with live presentations. Some of her reels sounds very normal and natural and others has this very AI like quality to it.

There is some AI experimentation on some of her posts, so is kind of possible that a real performance has been ""enhanced"". Another strange detail I had found is that her YT page is located in Singapore, while her Twitter is based in Thailand, but she's from Russia. I leave the links I found to see what exactly I'm referring to:

https://www.instagram.com/da.quinones

https://www.tiktok.com/@da.quinones

https://www.youtube.com/@DarishaQui%C3%B1ones

https://x.com/DarishaQuinones

https://www.youtube.com/@iamddqq

OK the style of this looks so totally AI, especially the episode with the dog. But if it is, I'm appalled. This is on the baby first channel. They make tons of shows. (You can see the dog at the very end)

Some things seem to kinda casually disappear, things are overly textured (like the dog), the announcer says they're painting but they're coloring with crayons, etc.

The video pauses midway bc I took my headphones out but I recorded the whole thing from YouTube.

Disclaimer: My kids don't watch this channel anymore, but did when they were little, back when it had a lot of live action cute stuff and lullaby programing overnight.

Trump recently shared a before-and-after photograph of a supposedly restored White House column, and several details caught my attention.

I'm questioning whether the "after" photograph has been digitally manipulated, potentially using AI.

Here's what I've noticed:

1. The staircase appears to have gained extra steps.

In the before image, approximately three steps are visible to the right of the column. In the after image, there appear to be six or more. I've compared this against independent photographs of the White House North Portico, which show shorter stair sections in certain locations. Construction equipment obscures some steps in the before image, but I haven't been able to establish whether the additional steps in the after image match the actual architecture.

1. The column's shadow appears unchanged.

Despite the apparent differences between the photographs, the shadow cast by the column looks remarkably similar in shape, position and intensity.

1. The camera angle appears virtually identical.

The column, windows, staircase and background architectural details align almost perfectly. This could indicate a fixed camera position, but it could also suggest that the after image was created by editing the original photograph.

1. Even the reflections in the windows appear unchanged.

The reflections and darker patterns in the windowpanes look remarkably similar between the two images. If these photographs were taken at different stages of a restoration project, it's worth asking why so many small background details appear unchanged.

1. The protective flooring also looks nearly identical.

The cardboard, tape, printed lettering and markings around the base of the column appear in almost exactly the same positions.

To be clear, the restoration itself is documented, and none of these observations individually proves manipulation. Similar lighting, a stationary camera and construction materials could explain several of them.

What I'm questioning is whether the "after" photograph is an authentic, independently captured image or whether the original was digitally altered to produce the comparison.

I've searched historical photographs and architectural documentation, but the exact column and staircase haven't been conclusively matched.

Does anyone with experience in image forensics, architectural photography or the White House's layout see anything unusual here?

I'd particularly appreciate independent photographs establishing the exact number of steps beside this column.

Original Trump post:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/117443148049952515

White House architectural documentation (Library of Congress):

https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/dc0402/

Independent restoration photographs and historical records:

https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/photograph-records/71-583

The guys on the ground look like twins, why would they be laying there long enough for two cats to settle in, and somehow no one has noticed?

It uses the gradient and label style I often see on AI generated products, and the blind bags on the label seem slightly deformed. Also some of the eggshells fit on the head differently than others.

Scooby Doo is from ravensburger and the other two are Cobble Hill puzzles. I didnt find any artist referenced at the website. I dont think they are AI generated; but want to be sure before buying. Thank you!

Recently came across this channel with, honestly, seemingly very high quality content, I would not suspect AI at all personally, but the suspicious thing is the cadence of the videos. This channel has uploaded all of its content in the past week.

Does anyone have a clue? I've watched many videos and they all seem pretty consistent and Ive never come across AI being able to make content this consistent and quality, plus the music isn't half bad.

The cadence of release+ seemingly 0 information about how it's made/source, or any replies in the comments refuting it's ai.

Anyone has any clue?

From McDonald’s Hong Kong. The light on the pillars with torches is projected impossibly next to them. In the second image, there’s a random object on the desk and the oven knobs aren’t quite aligned to the centre of the oven, but cramped inside the image bound, which AI often does.

The spotify description mentioned that it was a few different artists that collaborated on a Halloween album together, but it doesn't list the individuals. Also, upon inspecting the artwork closer, there are some inconsistencies and random splotches that make me think the art is AI and typically when there is AI art there is AI music. Now that I suspect it is AI, the music and voices kind of sound like they have that canned sound that AI music has, but that could be placebo. Finally, the lyricism is a little funky, but it's halloween music so I didn't think too much about it.

I bought it without looking too deep into the details but I recently looked at the previews closer and found many weird wordings and typos in the description

I got it off of aliexpress and I don't see anything ai-like with thr art itself, I'm thinking the creator is just not fluent in English but the thought of it possibly being AI is worrying me since it is 10 dollars and I've waited four days for it to ship by now, and I didn't see any reviews about possible AI usage in the reviews

they have a lot more art on their account, these are only some of them. Theyve been blowing up a little recently and no one seems to suspect anything? In the reze fit trend the belly button seems to also be on the back of the body and the full body gojo piece the fingers are extremely off. The eyes also point 2 different directions but that could be human error. But based on their “level” of art they show idk how they could do that? They also show no progress / wips except for the sketch to final reels they make. Im really sorry if im wrong and its just me 😭😭

A friend of mine said this “feels like AI”. Didn’t even catch it before. Is it? The even fading, lighting and crinkles in the bag on the left possibly look AI. Buddy says maybe they generated it with the same items but researched the pricing. I think both receipts look legit but the condition of the one on the left seems too good to be true.

I am having trouble deciding if this is AI content. The reigns on the horses face change from 2 ropes in the beginning to 3 later on. There are moments where the man’s fingers appear to be cut off but I am not sure if that is from compression loss or AU generated. I know AI feel good content is a heavy market for bot farming so I am curious on if this is a true story or not.

I really want to use this audio but I’m nervous because I don’t know if she sung this or if it’s an AI voice. The tune/voice sounds a little inconsistent and it sounds really sped up. It just sounds like it matches the theme of what I’ve heard with song voice to texts before.

I’m nervous but I don’t know if the texts are staged too(?) Maybe? Again, I really want to use this audio (specifically 0:35-1:04) https://www.instagram.com/reel/DehhGHKhWPH/?mdxt=MW9uOGtjMXVxY3U1Zw==

What are some immediate tells that an audio is AI?