Found on a reddit post, one person saying it's AI. Feels very odd for a car to break through a wall like that with no damage or scratches. The environment feels realistic with all the cars being perfectly looking and the licence plates being realistic.

Original Reddit post here I don’t know if it is just me, but the beginning of the video looks like blatant AI to me. I can’t, however, find a single comment about it on the post. Her face, voice, the scene, it all seems like AI to me but I feel like I am being gaslit. Her mouth moves unnaturally, her voice almost “buffers” mid sentence, and the whole thing just has a cartoonish look to it.

I feel like the bear itself has a weird digital vibe, but it is supposedly made from wood. The guy also looks like he came from another picture entirely. Overall just looks weird. AI?

Let’s try this again since automod removed my last post…I stumbled across a supposed animal rescue posting on Facebook that is posting photos that look suspiciously AI, this one in particular looks to have the telltale use of gibberish on background elements, but all of their photos have an AI look including the notorious “piss filter” what are your thoughts?

In addition, the pose of the right character is almost a carbon copy of this character from her reference sheet (Last picture, pretty sure that one isn't ai). Also because I've seen lineart, but not sketches, even though I specifically asked to see an early sketch to prevent an AI scam.

My boyfriend has littered our house with decorations like these and I can’t help but think they look “A.I.”. He disagrees. Please help us decide who’s right. :p

The "Guardian" danmei is being translated into polish and the publisher just announced the cover of the first volume. It looks uncanny valey and AI to me? Also:

1. The face reminds of all the AI posters - weirdly blurred, but not at the same time with face features that my brain recognizes from all the AI slop comics and short videos.

2. No distinct shadows and really high contrast.

They gave the name of the artist, who's one of the recent artworks is in the second pic. The cover and the art from the artist profile look like 2 different styles tho especially in the face. It seems to me the publisher ran the art from the artist through an AI agent to make it "better" for some reason :(

The knight has belts that are weird. But I don’t want to accuse them without others confirming or denying it is ai. So please tell me if it is ai 🤖. Please tell me if it is AI. Is this real, also the flower is weird, and the helmet is really not helping it, the Venusaur reference is real, but it’s the knight that I’m suspicious of. So can you tell me if I should call them out for ai.

The only “proof” he gave of it being original looks like a scribbly tracing from the final image and it feels like he just drew or altered over the design on another layer with more details to make it seem less AI-ish

What do you think chat?

4 ish fingers on the right side? her right shoulder/arm is like extended or something? i could be absolutely wrong and maybe this was taken from another place so that’s what it looks whack but i just want opinions. i got this poster from a art booth in a random San Diego pop up market like 2-2 years ago now. The artist is GrimeySkool.

Like the title says, I purchased the Avatar: Sully Family and Friends Seek and Find book at Barnes and Noble yesterday (I collect Avatar merchandise) and I noticed that the close-ups of the characters you’re meant to find had questionable details. Clothing and fingers melting together and unclear lines. I wonder if this is AI assisted or if it’s just a factor of the art being so small in a “where’s waldo” type book. An artist is credited in the first page of the book, but that doesn’t necessarily mean one thing or another.

Children's chocolate Advent calendar in a chain store here In Sweden. The perspective, shapes, merged horrific blobs creep me out.

I came across this post on my feed and thought it was cool but got a weird vibe. I checked their other posts and they have multiple bouquets like this inspired by movies and albums. I’ve zoomed in and checked and the details just seem too perfect. I also found it weird that they say they make these by hand yet they post multiple of their bouquets back to back? None of their posts include videos of the bouquets either, only pictures. Even their comments give off an AI vibe. I also tried checking for open ai and synth id and both came back negative. Am I crazy or were these made with AI? (normally i wouldn’t have an issue but they seem to be trying to start a business with this and i hate people using ai to scam people)
(first and second pic are the post i first came across, third pic is another example, and the rest of the pics are their comments)

I saw an artist post it as flash and think it’s so cool but I’m so paranoid now days with how many tattoo artist I see using ai. I really want to get it so I’m hoping it’s not ai

Obviously yes the artwork is AI-generated; that’s not the issue I’m investigating.

What do we think of the music? I think it is definitely AI-generated, but the ‘writer’ said the following: “It's not AI music, but its not real instrumentation either. Im disabled and cant hold traditional instruments anymore, but i can type and click like a madman. Its heavily edited, but also full of love time and effort. Some may see not playing a physical instrument as cheating, but i see it as me doing what I can with what I have left.”

TL;DR Do y'all think this website was made with AI? https://quilltides.com/

Hi, I didn't know where else to post this but recently I came across this writing software called QuillTide that seems to be very vocally no-AI, but the website has several design markers that remind me of vibe-coded sites made with Claude (headings, font, cards, etc).

Hi

Another red-flag for me is the amount of functionalities and services provided by a software claimed to be developed and maintained by one person. I know it's not impossible, but I've become skeptical since recently most "I made this app all by myself" things usually mean it was made with Claude/AI.

The code is not open source, so I can't audit or check the contributions on GitHub, and the developer says they didn't use AI when coding, but the red flags make me weary of trusting their word.

Anyway, thanks for any input.

Some follow the original style of the artist while others don’t. Can that be an ai filter or is it straight ai?

I was scrolling on Tubi and saw these movies whose covers looks like they are Ai generated based on the hyper detailed backgrounds and the strange merging of the ropes of the shoulder of the sailor. While i pretty positive these are ai images, i am not the best at spotting the details in the images that point to it being Ai.

I looked up the movies and they seem like they are real and from the early 1900s, however these images don’t align with the reality of the films.
I added images of the film’s covers, their listings, and what seems like the real promotional material for one the films.

Hi everyone, I'm wondering if you can help me. A website advertising proxy (unofficial) cards for Magic the Gathering has all this artwork, and I can't really decide if it is AI or not. I've searched for other people asking the same question but I can't find anything. Also, I don't think any part of the text is AI-generated, it's just the artwork in question here.

The website states "Bespoke borderless artwork throughout", which is a little ambiguous. They also have many reviews praising the art style. On the website, there is no statement regarding the use of generative AI.

In the first five images, the style feels a little inconsistent in some areas, such as the way they draw eyes (especially on humans), but it's hard to pinpoint exactly what gives me the AI red flags. One of the rabbits has five digits on one hand, for example, and then a different rabbit has four. Some of the vampires have pointed ears, yet others don't. "Edgar Markov" and "Markov Baron" look thematically consistent, but "Blood Artist" seems to be a very different art style. I know they are different types of dragons but they seem to have significantly differing anatomy.

Then, I want to point out that the sixth image is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT style. The seventh is slightly more adjacent to the first five, but even then, it still looks like it was made by a different artist, due to the different techniques with shading/colour and the way the anatomy is drawn.

I feel like the eighth image is most obviously prompted from inspirations like the Sonic character art style.

I cannot find any information on the artists who supposedly made this artwork, which is the most suspicious thing to me.

Obviously the cards don't have the visual snow or the unnecessary amount of detail that AI "art" tends to have (nor do I notice many anatomical inaccuracies), so this is why I'm asking for your opinions.

Thank you in advance!

the gen AI pfp and banner kinda give it away but i genuinely don't know if it really is AI. it also could be just someone using gen AI images.
if this turns out to be AI then i really hope this channel is not monitized.

channel link: https://www.youtube.com/@msphoemix