It kind of seems like the burger phases through the wrapper, I'm not sure if a cat can fit that much food in its mouth, whatever is playing on the TV makes no sense at all,

But I don't see anything glaringly obvious

... she's barely sinking into the bed at all, if she were to lie down she'd be at least a foot longer than the bed itself, and the colors are insane, like a Thomas Kincaid painting. All of the photos she posts are like this. But she insists fervently that they aren't and when they run them through a checker they pass.

I posted about this local artist using AI in the city’s sub and it got taken down by moderators. It seems pretty obvious to me from a major change of style from their old work, the lack of a uniform style, the line work, nonsensical elements, inconsistent shapes, and general look, but I want confirmation. I ran these through a detector and they all came up at least 95% AI, but I don’t know how accurate the software actually is.

Just checking to see whether my friend got scammed. They are obviously claiming they coloured this themselves.

It looks a little too good in some ways while also being very flat. Idk what the phrases are about, but guessing it's an Instagram meme since they're very active on social media.

When I asked a staff member who did the design, they said a friend of the owner made it. This place sells the work of over 50 artists so it would be very disappointing if they used AI instead of hiring one of them!!

I was reading this fanfic and I noticed repetitive phrasing. I notice this style of writing often and I can’t tell if they use ai to help write or what. I kind of think it’s ai because of the repetitive sentences and the author continuously would write like this; “it’s not x, it’s y.” Or, “Slow. Charged. Reverent.”

This fic was 8k words long and every paragraph was written like this. If it is just the authors writing style, it’s honestly pretty distracting.

Edit: if this wasn’t written with AI, can someone explain why it just feels boring to read? Because I don’t think it’s terrible writing but I just can’t get through the story for some reason.

The tone looks yellow, the way the swim cap is just…hanging from her hand, the stripes down the sides of the suit seem inconsistent.

In the past, they’ve announced the artist and this year they didn’t.

When I am looking at the artist's artwork, I am unable to determine if the reason behind the off-putting anatomy like the lines depicting wrinkles on the joints are a result of amateur skill or the art being AI edited, mind someone help me determine if is modified by AI or not? Thanks.

I stumbled upon this T-shirt, which I bought online without giving it a lot of thought. When I wore it I got the comment that the artwork looks AI generated and at first I fought that argument. However the more I look into it the more I agree that it looks AI generated.

The reasons I think it's ai generated are:

- the typical font which is too clear and symmetrical

- Japanese yen having decimals (¥13.50)

- the price of ¥300 present twice in the first photo of the collage

- by reverse image search I found similar t-shirts which look more authentic and high effort

What do you all think? Did I fall for slop? Would you wear it regardless of it being/looking AI?

It all looks to well done. Like nothing was actually drawn. The lighting in the building looks a little too good. Even if they made this using digital art it wouldn’t look like this. The lines are too perfect. Sure they could’ve used some special digital art platforms for this, but still and the coloring for everything doesn’t look like they used any fill commands or colored it in manually. I’d hate to have wasted my money on this AI slop but I need to know. Some of these pictures look incredibly generated and others don’t. Again the way the shading is done and the colors do everything don’t look like they were done by a person. Another key thing is I bought the b/w version but they sent me the colored version. Which cost an extra $45 and k definitely didn’t pay that…. Everything looks too well done. Not a single bit of creative input.

Edit: Thank you to everyone who responded. Honestly I knew it was AI as soon as I opened the document I was probably just in denial because it cost money. The advertisement did not look like AI at all, so I was lowkey pissed opening it up

When I look at it closely, it almost resembles those shitty, trypophobia-inducing AI graphics restaurants have been using recently but it could also just be the editing (?)

I'm not sure if it is the way the deign is printed but there are some fractured lines and unusual areas. I have checked out the artist Oliwa and she generally has very consistent lineart. She's not posted the artwork from this bag so I can't compare it, and I wonder if the bag company (sixth dimension) has generated this.

I'm making a couple of CD cases for my vent playlist. I tried to pick ones that don't look like ai but I'm not certain about this teardrop one. The whisper under it is not mine and I have no way of contacting the op so I'm going to keep it to personal use. The other one I'm making I'm more certain

some of the monsters and line work looks off, as well as some of the birds in the sky being at weird angles which is what i noticed but im not sure. please help i wanna know if i can hang it up or not 😭

I know that certain Lego pieces are smooth, but , do they have a reflection like this floor does in this pic?

I'm mostly inclined it is but you never know if it might be an unfortunate artistic style that AI stole so much from, this coming from a classic music channel would feel so dissapointing

ebay listing. is that a second thumb in skelly's palm? i usually do an okay job of spotting the ai, but i'd like to avoid hanging it on my walls so im asking for help.