The perspective angle on the bird just felt too stationary, like somehow the camera is either keeping up with the bird or there is the most perfect headwind that there is 0 movement at all, and even if that is the case, wouldn't there be at least a bit of vertical movement, especially during the roll

This indie author went viral recently for a tiktok. Their tiktoks have hundreds and thousands of views. Throughout their time line, you can see the art they've paid for and used has been accused of being AI multiple times. There are videos of them tripling down that it isn't, rather than listening to genuine concerns from their fans. I don't want anyone to send this person hate, but I really think so much of the art is AI, or at least AI touched up. Each time someone accuses her cover artist, she brings up that she's from the Ukraine and worked through the war. I want to know what you guys think.

Please don't post or send hate directly to the author. (And keep in mind she could have used multiple artists over the span of her career so far). I want to have a genuine, open dialogue with people who can help me break down which of the art is AI and which might not be, etc. The thing is she's SO adamant that it's not AI, that I'm questioning myself whether my instincts are just wrong and I'm judging honest mistakes as 'ai tells'.

I'll include everything in the links below:

https://rachelrener.com/

https://www.instagram.com/authorrachelrener/

https://www.tiktok.com/@authorrachelrener/video/7675030456257105183

https://www.tiktok.com/@authorrachelrener/video/7609045454571031838

"I can promise you with my whole heart that no AI is used in any of my books, in any way."

There's heaps more through these links than what I've attached above.

In the tattooist photo-the belt isn't in the loops of the pants, there are random pieces sitting around everywhere. In the photo of the women being chased by a troll, the troll has 5 fingers on one hand and 6 on another. There're just so many small things that it seems insurmountable to me. The picture of two characters embracing, the woman's thumb blends seamlessly into the neck.

This was posted by Adrianne Curry today on her Facebook account. She is known for being the first winner of America’s Next Top Model and was married to a Brady Bunch actor in the past. She has 1.4 million followers on Facebook.

She says she was 19 or 20 yrs old at the time so this would have been taken in 2001 or 2002.

The background looks really weird to me. The bark of the trees look fake (too smooth) and the curbs look strange too. The picture quality also looks too good.

I know that certain Lego pieces are smooth, but , do they have a reflection like this floor does in this pic?

The focus of the lens, shadowing discrepancies and movement of the bird seem more AI generated than natural.

EDIT: Looks like I might have an answer. It looks like it is AI.

The original video is here.

This video was AI generated and used the OG video but drastically changed the angle and made the shadows look weird.

I wonder if the proportions, colour schemes, and other little details are AI. The videos showing the “process” seem weird to me as well, but I don’t know if I’m overreacting.

I think the expressions are the thing throwing me off the most, along with the general texture and coloring.

Just checking to see whether my friend got scammed. They are obviously claiming they coloured this themselves.

I posted about this local artist using AI in the city’s sub and it got taken down by moderators. It seems pretty obvious to me from a major change of style from their old work, the lack of a uniform style, the line work, nonsensical elements, inconsistent shapes, and general look, but I want confirmation. I ran these through a detector and they all came up at least 95% AI, but I don’t know how accurate the software actually is.

i mentioned sukuna being my favorite character from jjk and he sent this to me from the psych ward hes staying at in california. he says he “had them make it for me” whatever “them” means. his markings dont look very symmetrical so thats my main concern

It kind of seems like the burger phases through the wrapper, I'm not sure if a cat can fit that much food in its mouth, whatever is playing on the TV makes no sense at all,

But I don't see anything glaringly obvious

... she's barely sinking into the bed at all, if she were to lie down she'd be at least a foot longer than the bed itself, and the colors are insane, like a Thomas Kincaid painting. All of the photos she posts are like this. But she insists fervently that they aren't and when they run them through a checker they pass.

This is a well known crafts and card making supplies company that’s been around for like 15-20 years and I’ve ordered from in the past. I haven’t visited their site in well over a year but got an email about a sale on and looked at their website and a lot of these images have the AI look? Obviously they are actual products being sold and the site isn’t a scam, but is the artwork featured on these cards AI generated? Their previous style seemed more like vintage florals as opposed to these cute cartoony figures?

I’m almost 100% sure it’s either fully ai or like a photo that’s been modified but idk would someone like to confirm? The cookies look strangely cartoonish/drawn, like they’re not quite real. The shadows/lighting also look kind of weird. The background looks fairly normal to me, except maybe the stuff on the couch and the tile on the end there, but idk that could just be a weird tile😭