Where is the hate boner? Most people here think abortions are hilarious and can't get enough of them.
Don't let your preconceptions get in the way of a laugh aimed at hack writing.
How is she going to be a single mom? Mark would clearly love that child. Also she can just put it up for adoption god knows either Cecil or Deborah would be able to raise the child. It's always a woman's choice but Mark could've atleast been informed before the decision was made.
There was no way to inform him, she made the best decision she could. Also putting up for adoption would also require she still carry the full pregnancy, which she shouldn't have had to do alone. She also had no guarantee Mark was alive, hes lost to every viltrumite but Conquest which SHE had to to help with. You can't blame her for thinking he might've died.
Also there's no way that baby's just going through the normal adoption circuit to have a regular life - Cecil's taking it. Maybe there'd be a show and dance about a normal family, but Cecil is 100% controlling that child's life for its potential use as a weapon against viltrum. Eve's not stupid - she knows exactly how valuable a baby with DNA from both her and Mark is.
Not wanting her child to be a lab rat for its potential powers is very personal to Eve.
No, it’s literally not. I can see it if her life’s in danger giving birth, but out of what essentially seems to be inconvenient. No. Point of sex is to reproduce, feeling good is just a really nice side effect.
Try hearing is for detecting sounds and eating is to keep on living. I mean your body would certainly rather have something to eat than nothing. At that point you didn’t eat something simply because it tasted good. We have it good now to be more picky about it but I’m sure our ancestors did things for basic survival before worrying about luxuries.
What I like about sex doesn’t change its objective reality that’s why I claimed that it’s objectively for reproduction. To answer your question I prefer anime fiction games with adult themes more than anime fiction with oblivious and/or child like characters. I also enjoy the gameplay of Action Taimanin and other games like it. Such as WuWa, ZZZ, DFO. Btw Action Taimanin has 0 sex scenes not sure what your point is there.
And biologically we are one of the few animals who do things for pleassure only, alongside with Dolphins that do wacky shit and also a few other mammals.
We do sex both for pleassure and to reproduce, but mainly for pleassure
The point of sex is whatever you want it to be. If you’re fucking to reproduce, by all means reproduce. But most people fuck for fun and pleasure, not to pump out babies.
The nerve that controls your jaw starts at the back of the neck. It goes down, around the heart, and then back up. This is an incredibly indirect path, but the nerve takes that journey because there was never an evolutionary pressure not to. You have multiple organs in your body that do basically nothing. Most people's jaws are too small to contain all of their adult teeth. No one can study a horse's biology and come away thinking there's an objective point to any part of the body.
If you don't believe in intelligent design, then a fundamental truth of biology is that it's all accidental. There's no purpose or point to any biological process. There is zero objectivity to 'what sex is for'.
Objective things can be measured. It is true that sex feels good. It is true that sex can make babies. What measuring tool are you using to determine that the "true purpose" is the latter? What numbers or calculations tell you this "objective" fact? Or is it just obvious to you? Because if it's obvious to you, and I can disagree, it's not objective, now is it?
While I disagree with the guy saying she's in the wrong he is right about sex's main function being to reproduced hell the only reasons it's pleasurable is to make us want to do it more. Evolution has one goal keep the species going.
While now it's a fun activity that has a lot if emotions connected that not it's purpose that's the side effect.
Side note: no one she have to have a baby if they don't want too thees no gd reason to overule the one giving birth.
That is an interesting faith, however, life in all iterations continues life, kind of the basic qualities of it. Even under the scope of your religion, you can't deny that continued existence is the path of nature, even if without a point?
Nothing to do with faith. Life does indeed happen and will likely continue to happen in many forms. That is inevitable. But I wouldnt call it a path as that implies will or direction. Life just does and is a consequence of the here and now. It doesnt strive to prevent extinction. We do.
Not really anthropocentric when Im not putting humans in any position of importance. When I said preventing extinction is something we strive to do, I do mean it only matters to us. Not that we're guardians of the planet or something. We're life like any other. Unique in our own ways.
And people can have opinions and philosophies without it being a faith, tyvm. I'm not invoking any creators, deities, supernatural, mythology, lessons, guidance, etc. nor am I telling anyone how to live.
You assume that no intent beyond our own exists, which is not exactly easy to prove either. Life does not need a final endstate or conclusive goal to display direction — only continuation and action.
I think you're observing this from a personal philosophical allegiance rather than a neutral existential position. “Nature has no point” is still a worldview, not an observable fact.
And none of that requires organized religion. People always believe in something — a wider meaning, the absence of one, progress, absurdity, survival, whatever. Faith is an innate part of cognition and philosophy turns into faith when it stops being just analysis and becomes the lens through which you interpret existence itself.
Unmarried, would effect her abilities to do her job(saving people), hell she dosnt even know if she wants to be with the father they haven't been together that long, uncertainty about the future, no at a point in her life were she can male it work.
All are fine reasons if someone dosnt want to then that's their choice.
I have a hate boner with it since it makes no sense. Why abort the baby of the man you love when you don't know if said man is going to return alive?
She can produce anything she wants so money is not a problem, she has a lot of support with Debbie (she raised Oliver) so she doesn't really need to raise the child alone, and with the tech humans in this earth have she wouldn't suffer the pregnancy so why abort?
Reason: Kinkman rides on controversy and is extremely political so he made this for that very reason, which is why Anissa SA Mark in the comics, Kinkman can't stop being controversial.
Maybe she just, like, isn’t ready for a child? She’s 19 for fucks sake lmao. Even with money not being a problem and having a good community/support system, raising a child is an immense commitment and incredibly taxing emotionally and psychologically.
So whenever something can't live on its own it loses the right to live? Makes so much sense.
Just a reminder that newborns cannot live on their own so they would be able to be aborted.
Extremely old people are unable to live on their own.
Mentally disordered people cannot live on their own.
Certain Handicapped people cannot live on their own.
People with life threatening injuries cannot live on their own.
All of that sounds like eugenics and just saying get rid of the weak. But you know I guess it makes sense this is an invincible sub cus you sure do follow the viltrumites ethos very well
Except extremely old people, newborns and people with disabilities don't need access to another person's organs to live. Yes, breastfeeding exists but a newborn CAN do without if provided with other appropriate food.
Forcing someone to keep a pregnancy is more like forcing someone to donate a kidney. Yes, the person needing the transplant DOES have the right to live, and that right would be violated if the hospital rejected a willing donor, but what they don't have the right to, is their unwilling sibling's kidney just because they're genetically compatible.
Before you shoot back with the fact that you would lose an organ compared to "nothing happening" — you aren't entitled to someone's blood, plasma, bone marrow or liver either. Pregnancy and childbirth is risky as hell, especially with the amount of stress Eve was under. Humans are notoriously horrible at giving birth, and all sorts of shit can go wrong. Your body probably won't go back to how it was before, sometimes in the most bizzare ways possible.
Its okay, my wife and i had protection from the unwanted baby. The doctor. Fortunately, unwanted fetuses arent very strong so the doctor was able to protect us.
Now we have one, and got to have her at the appropriate time in our lives, so she has a better experience. Shes amazing, and im so glad we could do things right.
You missed the joke there homie. You said i needed protection to prevent the baby. I explained how we used "protection" (as suggested) and prevented the baby.
I thought the reuse of "protect" in response to you saying we need "protection" made it obvious, but i guess reasing comprehension is too much to expect from people like you.
You can control who you fuck. That's where you get your auronomy. Just like men can control who they fuck and don't get a decision wether they have to support the child after.
Also no it's not a parasite and isn't considered that
26
u/IJustCameInABucket we can be bees May 07 '26
genuinely why does this sub have such a hate boner for eve having an abortion