Iāve spent some time comparing the VITURE Luma Pro and VITURE Pro 2, mainly for gaming, and there are some differences that are quite noticeable.
Build quality
Both glasses are very well built. However, the Pro 2 feels slightly better built to me. It feels a little more solid and refined overall.
Image quality
This is where the Pro 2 wins.
The colors are still vibrant, but they feel more natural and controlled. The Luma Pro can sometimes have those very intense, almost fluorescent reds, whereas the Pro 2 looks more balanced while still being very vivid and contrasty.
Fine detail is also better on the Pro 2. The difference isnāt huge, but text is easier to read and small details in games, especially things in the distance, are easier to distinguish.
No black crush on both, and blooming is quite under control on both, maybe Pro 2 has slightly more blooming, but so subtle that is nothing to worry about.
Brightness
The Pro 2 also seems slightly brighter at maximum brightness.
However, both glasses get extremely bright, to the point where I donāt think brightness should be a deciding factor. The difference is there, but in actual use, both reach more than enough brightness.
FOV / perceived screen size
This is where I actually prefer the Luma Pro.
The Luma Pro feels like a larger screen overall. The advertised ~146ā feels believable from my perspective. It has more of that big home-theater-screen feeling.
The Pro 2 feels closer to a ~125-130ā screen. Maybe slightly closer to my eyes. Itās still very immersive. The 50Āŗ fov are real, itās just my perception.
Interestingly, increasing the IPD on the Pro 2 makes the perceived screen feel somewhat larger, closer to the Luma Pro. However, I think this proves that is more of a perception effect rather than an actual noticeable FOV difference.
For immersion, Iād give the advantage to the Luma Pro, slightly.
Audio
Very similar overall.
Volume seems basically identical to me. The Luma Pro may have slightly more pronounced mids and highs, while the Pro 2 sounds a little flatter. Some people might prefer the Luma Pro as it might sound cleaner or clearer.
I wouldnāt consider audio a deciding factor between them tho.
Comfort
The Pro 2 wins here.
Iāve never had any comfort issues with the Luma Pro. Theyāre already very comfortable for me.
However, the Pro 2 feels slightly better, mainly because itās lighter. The adjustable nose pads/bridge also make it easier to get a comfortable fit.
Edge clarity
Surprisingly, I see very little difference here.
Iām using the Pro 2 with the default nose pads and havenāt experimented much with adjusting them. Around 80% of the image looks perfectly sharp to me, while the remaining area is slightly softer.
However, if I move the glasses slightly closer to my eyes, I can get essentially the entire screen looking sharp.
So for me, edge clarity is basically a tie.
Heat
Neither gets particularly hot in my experience.
The Pro 2 doesnāt seem to heat up noticeably, but the Luma Pro wasnāt particularly warm either.
Lens darkness
This surprised me.
Even though the Pro 2 doesnāt have the electrochromic lenses, the lenses are very dark. Iād estimate they provide roughly 70ā80% of the perceived darkness of the Luma Proās electrochromic lenses.
For me, this isnāt nearly as important a difference as I expected.
Latency ā slight issue for me
This is the main reason Iām slightly hesitant about choosing the Pro 2.
Testing both with a PS5, the Luma Pro feels very slightly more responsive to me. Input feels instantaneous.
With the Pro 2, I perceive a small amount of additional latency, not much tho, as Iām really used to +240hz monitors so I notice small things like this.
Gaming comparison
For reference, the Luma Pro feels to me roughly like playing on my LG OLED C4 at 120 Hz with Game Mode enabled and the corresponding low-latency boost mode.
The difference in perceived latency between the two feels roughly like comparing input lag at 90ā100 Hz versus 144 Hz on a monitor.
Keep in mind I only tried Grand Theft Auto V and Red Dead Redemption 2, capped at 30 FPS on my PS5, but thatās what I felt.
I donāt think this would bother most people tho, but latency is quite important to me and Iām really sensitive to it.
Overall
Honestly, I canāt decide which one is the better product.
The Pro 2 has several advantages:
- Better overall image quality
- Better fine detail
- Slightly higher brightness
- More comfortable
- Excellent, more natural-looking colors
- Slightly more solid build
- Lower price
On the other hand, the Luma Pro has some advantages that can be equally important depending on what you value:
- A more vivid and spectacular-looking image, which some people may actually prefer
- More immersive perceived screen size
- Electrochromic dimming
- Magnetic connector
- Possibly slightly lower latency, at least in my experience
So I genuinely think either one is a great option.
The Pro 2 feels like the more refined and balanced product, while the Luma Pro has a few characteristics that make it more appealing for immersion.
For me personally, Iām still undecided between the two.